Presence and Usability in Shared Space Virtual Conferencing: A Participatory Design Study

The use of teleconferencing as an alternative to taking part in expensive or impractical traditional meetings is becoming more and more popular. However, there are limitations to both audio and video conferencing, such as lack of presence and involvement. These can potentially be avoided by the use of virtual shared space conferencing. This paper describes a three-phase study intended to investigate the issues of presence and usability with respect to this alternative form of conferencing. The first phase involved informal tests to establish a suitable starting point for the second phase, which employed a participatory design methodology whereby users of a prototype system contributed to its development toward an optimally usable and well-featured design, both for the meeting environment and for the user interface to it. The third phase involved further user trials to assess and refine the conclusions indicated by the second phase. The results of the study indicate a number of requirements for optimal design of shared space conferencing systems. These requirements include (1) the need to be selective about the degree of realism in different aspects of the system, (2) the importance of view control and avatar animation in support of talker identification, (3) the desire of users for flexibility and freedom with regard to turn-taking and gesture control, and (4) the benefits of symbolic acting when certain important considerations for its implementation are respected. Finally, the results also show that, following a short period of user habituation, shared space conferencing can induce a strong sense of involvement and presence for users.

[1]  J. Tromp,et al.  Presence, Telepresence and immersion: The cognitive factors of embodiment and interaction in virtual environments , 1995 .

[2]  Steven M. Drucker,et al.  Intelligent Camera Control in a Virtual Environment , 1994 .

[3]  Gregory B. Newby,et al.  Virtual reality: Scientific and technological challenges , 1996 .

[4]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: fluency and awareness of attentional focus , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  The Sense of Presence within Auditory Virtual Environments , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  A. Damasio.  Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York (Grosset/Putnam) 1994. , 1994 .

[7]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  The Effects of Pictorial Realism, Delay of Visual Feedback, and Observer Interactivity on the Subjective Sense of Presence , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[8]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1981 .

[9]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[10]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Out and About — Real World Teleconferencing , 2000 .

[11]  S. McConnell,et al.  Virtual conferencing , 1997 .

[12]  Toby Howard,et al.  Design Issues for Virtual Reality Systems , 1995, Virtual Environments.

[13]  Thomas B. Sheridan.  Further Musings on the Psychophysics of Presence , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  T. Abel,et al.  Mind, Self, and Society , 1934 .

[15]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[16]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Presence within Virtual Environments as a Function of Visual Display Parameters , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[17]  S. Ellis.  Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments , 1991 .

[18]  Mark L. Johnson.  The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[19]  F. Biocca.  Chapter 3 Intelligence augmentation: The vision inside virtual reality , 1996 .

[20]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  Telepresence, time delay and adaptation , 1991 .

[21]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[22]  Richard P. Honeck,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things (Book) , 1989 .

[23]  John Bowers,et al.  Talk and embodiment in collaborative virtual environments , 1996, CHI.