Toward a component-based design framework of the international information technology standardization process

This article is about a proposal to develop a component-based design (CBD) framework of the international information technology standardization (IITS) process. This process is criticized widely in information systems (IS) literatures for its complexity as a barrier to successful project development. These criticisms have not challenged this process itself or accede to proactive action toward positive changes. We stress the importance of reconstructing this process within a CBD framework, not only to reduce sources of complexity but also to give special prominence of project development. Primarily, our qualitative empirical case study of five projects is grounded in the organization information processing theory (OIPT) as a lens. Theorizing from the qualitative empirical evidence we define the IITS process, followed by its inductive analysis guided by OIPT as a lens through three levels: its environment, content and performance. Through this lens we articulate assumptions about IITS process complexity. From rich descriptions of this process, we combine selected dimensions of CBD and OIPT as a lens to develop the theoretical depth of concepts that add detail to our CBD framework. One implication for practice of this framework is for provisioning incisive IITS process change strategies drawing upon its dominating qualities. This article makes three contributions to the IS field: this CBD framework is a key contribution. We bridge the gap in knowledge by defining the IITS process, explicating its complexity toward proactive action. By using OIPT as a lens we extend its application.

[1]  Michal J. Bonino,et al.  Standards as change agents in the information technology market , 1991 .

[2]  P. Corning Complexity Is Just a Word , 1998 .

[3]  Richard M. Adler,et al.  Emerging Standards for Component Software , 1995, Computer.

[4]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Information Privacy and Marketing: What the U.S. Should (and Shouldn't) Learn from Europe , 2001 .

[5]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Methods for Studying Innovation Development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program , 1990 .

[7]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[8]  Peter J. Kammer Supporting dynamic distributed work processes with a component and event based approach , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2000 the New Millennium.

[9]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites , 1990 .

[10]  H. Landis Gabel,et al.  Competitive strategies for product standards : the strategic use of compatibility standards for competitive advantage , 1991 .

[11]  R. Werle Institutional aspects of standardization – jurisdictional conflicts and the choice of standardization organizations , 2001 .

[12]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Models in information behaviour research , 1999, J. Documentation.

[13]  Kai Jakobs,et al.  A proposal for an alternative standards setting process , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[14]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[15]  David E. Cook The Component-based Business: Plug and Play , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[17]  Renata Tesch,et al.  Qualitative research : analysis types and software tools , 1990 .

[18]  Jane P. Laudon,et al.  Management Information Systems: Organization and Technology in the Networked Enterprise , 1999 .

[19]  Leonard J. Bass,et al.  Scenario-Based Analysis of Software Architecture , 1996, IEEE Softw..

[20]  C. V. Starkey Engineering Design Decisions , 1993 .

[21]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Technochange management: using IT to drive organizational change , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite,et al.  A Scenario Construction Process , 2000, Requirements Engineering.

[23]  Kristina Tamm Hallström,et al.  Organizing the Process of Standardization , 2002 .

[24]  Watts S. Humphrey,et al.  Managing the software process , 1989, The SEI series in software engineering.

[25]  Ute Hoffmann,et al.  New technology at the outset : social forces in the shaping of technological innovations , 1992 .

[26]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Role of Intermediating Institutions in the Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI): How Industry Associations Intervened in Denmark, Finland, and Hong Kong , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[27]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[29]  Rob Procter,et al.  The making of standards: looking inside the work groups , 2001, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[30]  Laurence Brooks,et al.  Assessing organisational obstacles to component-based development: a case study approach , 2000, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[31]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Information behaviour: an interdisciplinary perspective , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[32]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[33]  Theodora Ngosi,et al.  Software standards: an information requirements framework , 1993, J. Inf. Technol..

[34]  R. Boland Phenomenology: a preferred approach to research on information systems , 1986, Trends in Information Systems.

[35]  C. Cargill Information technology standardization: Theory, process, and organizations , 1989 .

[36]  Jonathan Liebenau,et al.  An Analysis of the Information Technology Standardization Process , 1993 .

[37]  Minder Chen,et al.  Factors affecting the adoption and diffusion of XML and Web services standards for E-business systems , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[38]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[39]  L. L. Tripp,et al.  An international safety-critical software standard for the 1990s , 1993, Proceedings 1993 Software Engineering Standards Symposium.

[40]  David G. Ullman,et al.  Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use , 1997 .

[41]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Industry-Wide Information Systems Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the U.S. Residential Mortgage Industry , 2006, MIS Q..

[42]  Thomas Sikora,et al.  Digital video coding standards and their role in video communications , 1995, Proc. IEEE.

[43]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[44]  J. Matheson,et al.  The Smart Organization: Creating Value Through Strategic R&D , 1997 .

[45]  A. Davies The Human Face of Corporate Governance , 2001 .

[46]  George P. Huber,et al.  Organizational Information Systems: Determinants of Their Performance and Behavior , 1982 .

[47]  S. Newell Intranets and Knowledge Management : De-centred Technologies and the Limits of Technological Discourse , 1999 .

[48]  Milton Harris,et al.  Organization Design , 2000, Manag. Sci..

[49]  Ken Krechmer,et al.  Open Standards Requirements , 2006, Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res..

[50]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[51]  Jeff White,et al.  Coordinating technology: Studies in the international standardization of telecommunications , 1998 .

[52]  R. Brandis The Limits of Organization , 1975 .

[53]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[54]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Rules of Standard Setting Organizations: An Empirical Analysis , 2005 .

[55]  J.D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics Modeling: Tools for Learning in a Complex World , 2001, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[56]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[57]  Michal J. Bonino,et al.  Standards as change agents in the information technology market 1 Originally published in Computer S , 1999 .

[58]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work , 1995 .

[59]  A. Pettigrew WHAT IS A PROCESSUAL ANALYSIS. , 1997 .

[60]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Configurations of inter-organizational relationships : a comparison between US and Japanese automakers , 1995 .

[61]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[62]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  Issues of Time and Site Selection in Longitudinal Research on Change , 1990 .

[63]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[64]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Business process change , 1997 .

[65]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[66]  Pablo Pavón-Mariño,et al.  Third-generation mobile communications in europe: light and shadows , 2001, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[67]  Richard M. Adler,et al.  The Emergence of Distributed Component Platforms , 1998, Computer.

[68]  Chiara Criscuolo,et al.  Enterprise E-commerce , 2004 .

[69]  Langdon Morris,et al.  Fourth Generation R&D: Managing Knowledge, Technology, and Innovation , 1999 .

[70]  Joyce Kirk,et al.  Information in Organisations: Directions for Information Management , 1999, Inf. Res..

[71]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[72]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Establishing the Business of the Future:: the Role of Organizational Architecture and Information Technologies , 2003 .

[73]  Jintae Lee,et al.  Design Rationale Systems: Understanding the Issues , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[74]  L. Chiariglione Impact of MPEG standards on multimedia industry , 1998 .

[75]  Elsevier Sdol International Journal of Human-Computer Studies , 2009 .

[76]  M. Patton Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[77]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[78]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Power and interdependence , 1977 .

[79]  K. Mackenzie THE ORGANIZATION OF ORGANIZATIONS , 2001 .

[80]  S. Read Applications of Case Study Research , 2003 .

[81]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[82]  S. N. Baron,et al.  Point of View: The Standards Development Process and the NII: A View from the Trenches , 1994 .

[83]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[84]  Angela Lin,et al.  Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems , 2001 .

[85]  Jacqueline Holdsworth Software Process Design: Out of the Tar Pit , 1994 .

[86]  Petri Mähönen The standardization process in IT — too slow or too fast? , 2000 .

[87]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  A Theory of Theories in Information Systems , 2002 .

[88]  F. Cecil Brenner,et al.  Standardization Essentials: Principles and Practice , 2001 .

[89]  A.K. Reilly A US perspective on standards development , 1994, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[90]  Egon Berghout,et al.  Information technology standards and standardization: A global perspective , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[91]  Oliver Sims,et al.  Business Component Factory : A Comprehensive Overview of Component-Based Development for the Enterprise , 1999 .

[92]  Ian Alexander,et al.  An introduction to qualitative research , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[93]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[94]  Jay R. Galbraith Competing with flexible lateral organizations , 1993 .

[95]  R. Tesch Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software , 1990 .

[96]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Migration to Open-Standard Interorganizational Systems: Network Effects, Switching Costs, and Path Dependency , 2005, MIS Q..

[97]  Charles R. Severance The Value of the Formal Standards Process , 1995, Computer.

[98]  T. Rickards Sense making in organizations , 1997 .

[99]  John Hurd,et al.  IT Standardization: The Billion Dollar Strategy , 2005, Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res..

[100]  Sanjay Gosain,et al.  Realizing the vision for web services: Strategies for dealing with imperfect standards , 2007, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[101]  Roy Rada Consensus versus speed , 1995, CACM.

[102]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .