Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students

Despite efforts to recruit and retain more women, a stark gender disparity persists within academic science. Abundant research has demonstrated gender bias in many demographic groups, but has yet to experimentally investigate whether science faculty exhibit a bias against female students that could contribute to the gender disparity in academic science. In a randomized double-blind study (n = 127), science faculty from research-intensive universities rated the application materials of a student—who was randomly assigned either a male or female name—for a laboratory manager position. Faculty participants rated the male applicant as significantly more competent and hireable than the (identical) female applicant. These participants also selected a higher starting salary and offered more career mentoring to the male applicant. The gender of the faculty participants did not affect responses, such that female and male faculty were equally likely to exhibit bias against the female student. Mediation analyses indicated that the female student was less likely to be hired because she was viewed as less competent. We also assessed faculty participants’ preexisting subtle bias against women using a standard instrument and found that preexisting subtle bias against women played a moderating role, such that subtle bias against women was associated with less support for the female student, but was unrelated to reactions to the male student. These results suggest that interventions addressing faculty gender bias might advance the goal of increasing the participation of women in science.

[1]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and Discriminant Validity by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix,” Psychological Bulletin (2), March, pp. . , 1959 .

[2]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Philip Goldberg,et al.  Are women prejudiced against women? , 1968 .

[4]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  D E Koshland,et al.  Careers in science , 1991, Nature.

[6]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[7]  Lyle V. Jones,et al.  SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES , 1982 .

[8]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[9]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[10]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. , 1986 .

[11]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  P. Devine Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[13]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Leila T. Worth,et al.  Processing of persuasive in-group messages. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Daniel E. Koshland Careers in science. , 1991 .

[16]  J. Kasof,et al.  Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  A. Eagly,et al.  Are People Prejudiced Against Women? Some Answers From Research on Attitudes, Gender Stereotypes, and Judgments of Competence , 1994 .

[18]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. , 1995 .

[19]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[20]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The design and analysis of social-interaction research. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A general procedure for the estimation of interdependence. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Martha Foschi,et al.  Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women , 1996 .

[23]  Cecilia Elena Rouse,et al.  Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of , 1997 .

[24]  C. Goldin,et al.  Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of "Blind" Auditions on Female Musicians , 1997 .

[25]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[26]  C. Wennerås,et al.  Nepotism and sexism in peer-review , 1997, Nature.

[27]  Melenie J. Lankau,et al.  Relationships of gender, family responsibility and flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction , 1997 .

[28]  Patrick E. Shrout,et al.  Should Significance Tests be Banned? Introduction to a Special Section Exploring the Pros and Cons , 1997 .

[29]  Eugene D. Hahn,et al.  The Attitudes Toward Women Scale and Attitude Change in College Students , 1997 .

[30]  R. Mathar,et al.  Classification, Data Analysis, and Data Highways , 1998 .

[31]  Lotte Bailyn,et al.  A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT , 1999 .

[32]  M. Brewer The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? , 1999 .

[33]  R. Steinpreis,et al.  The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study , 1999 .

[34]  Martha Foschi,et al.  Double Standards for Competence: Theory and Research , 2000 .

[35]  Harrison Si,et al.  Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology: Author Index , 2013 .

[36]  N. Cozzarelli PNAS Early Edition. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  "Unlearning" automatic biases: the malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  K. Trzesniewski,et al.  Measuring Global Self-Esteem: Construct Validation of a Single-Item Measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale , 2001 .

[39]  Robert W. Lent,et al.  The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses , 2001 .

[40]  Nyla R. Branscombe,et al.  The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to one's prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members. , 2001 .

[41]  S. Lemon,et al.  The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism , 2001 .

[42]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Math = male, me = female, therefore math not = me. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  Nancy Hopkins,et al.  A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT , 2002 .

[45]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. , 2002 .

[46]  Rosalind C. Barnett,et al.  Learning in a Man's World: Examining the Perceptions of Undergraduate Women in Male-Dominated Academic Areas , 2002 .

[47]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site , 2002 .

[48]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Self and social identity. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[49]  Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination , 2003 .

[50]  Richard F. Martell,et al.  Male-Female Differences : A Computer Simulation , 2003 .

[51]  W. Clinton State of the Union Address , 2003 .

[52]  P. Mcintosh White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. , 2003 .

[53]  C. Stangor,et al.  The role of intent and harm in judgments of prejudice and discrimination. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo , 2004 .

[55]  Lu Hong,et al.  Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  M. Heilman,et al.  Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[57]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Constructed Criteria. Redefining Merit to Justify Discrimination , 2005 .

[58]  E. Spelke Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: a critical review. , 2005, The American psychologist.

[59]  M. Mahoney Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system , 1977, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[60]  Jo Handelsman,et al.  More Women in Science , 2005, Science.

[61]  M. Linn,et al.  Gender Similarities in Mathematics and Science , 2006, Science.

[62]  Mahzarin R. Banaji,et al.  The Development of Implicit Attitudes , 2006, Psychological science.

[63]  Shulamit Kahn,et al.  Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia 1973-2001 , 2006 .

[64]  Eric Luis Uhlmann,et al.  "I think it, therefore it's true": Effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discrimination. , 2007 .

[65]  Cecilia,et al.  Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal ? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination , 2007 .

[66]  Scott E. Page,et al.  Making the Difference: Applying a Logic of Diversity , 2007 .

[67]  Kelsey E. Medeiros,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers : Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[68]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[69]  D. Pager The Use of Field Experiments for Studies of Employment Discrimination: Contributions, Critiques, and Directions for the Future , 2007 .

[70]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Neural correlates of automatic beliefs about gender and race , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[71]  Edith D. de Leeuw,et al.  Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology , 2007 .

[72]  Eric Luis Uhlmann,et al.  Can an Angry Woman Get Ahead? , 2008, Psychological science.

[73]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Competent Yet Out in the Cold: Shifting Criteria for Hiring Reflect Backlash Toward Agentic Women , 2008 .

[74]  Heather M. Claypool,et al.  Identity salience moderates processing of group-relevant information , 2010 .

[75]  S. Ceci,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological Sex Differences in Math-intensive Fields on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[76]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men. , 2010 .

[77]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Disruptions in Women's Self-Promotion: The Backlash Avoidance Model 1 , 2010 .

[78]  S. Ceci,et al.  Do Subtle Cues About Belongingness Constrain Women's Career Choices? , 2011, Psychological inquiry.

[79]  C. O'Reilly,et al.  Reducing the backlash effect: Self‐monitoring and women's promotions , 2011 .

[80]  S. Shields,et al.  The Impact of the Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation in the Academy (WAGES-Academic) in Demonstrating Cumulative Effects of Gender Bias , 2011 .

[81]  F. Betz Handbook of Research Methods , 2011 .

[82]  David F. Feldon,et al.  Graduate Students’ Teaching Experiences Improve Their Methodological Research Skills , 2011, Science.

[83]  Michael I Norton,et al.  Whites See Racism as a Zero-Sum Game That They Are Now Losing , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[84]  Francis S Collins,et al.  Weaving a Richer Tapestry in Biomedical Science , 2011, Science.

[85]  S. Ceci,et al.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[86]  Molly Carnes,et al.  Integrating Theory and Practice to Increase Scientific Workforce Diversity: A Framework for Career Development in Graduate Research Training , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[87]  Science gender gap probed. , 2011, Nature.

[88]  N. Dasgupta,et al.  Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept: The Stereotype Inoculation Model , 2011 .

[89]  Anne E. Lincoln,et al.  Gender Segregation in Elite Academic Science , 2012 .

[90]  F1000Prime recommendation of Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. , 2012 .

[91]  S. Shields,et al.  How to Talk about Gender Inequity in the Workplace: Using WAGES as an Experiential Learning Tool to Reduce Reactance and Promote Self-Efficacy , 2012 .

[92]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. , 2012 .

[93]  I. de Melo-Martín,et al.  Interpreting Evidence: Why Values Can Matter As Much As Science , 2012, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[94]  Steve Olson,et al.  Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. , 2012 .

[95]  M. J. Chang,et al.  From Gatekeeping to Engagement: A Multicontextual, Mixed Method Study of Student Academic Engagement in Introductory STEM Courses , 2011, Research in higher education.

[96]  Eve Fine,et al.  Promoting Institutional Change Through Bias Literacy. , 2012, Journal of diversity in higher education.

[97]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  The Matilda Effect in Science Communication , 2013 .

[98]  H. Reis,et al.  Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology: Author Index , 2013 .

[99]  A. Griffin,et al.  Fewer invited talks by women in evolutionary biology symposia , 2013, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[100]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science , 2013, Nature.

[101]  S. A. Cole National Academy of Sciences (NAS) , 2013 .

[102]  Helen Shen Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap , 2013, Nature.

[103]  Remove social barriers , 2013 .

[104]  Wei Huang,et al.  Collaborating with People Like Me: Ethnic Co-Authorship within the Us , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[105]  Jason M. Sheltzer,et al.  Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[106]  K. W. Phillips,et al.  Rethinking the Baseline in Diversity Research , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[107]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Data from Paper “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant” , 2014 .

[108]  Ernesto Reuben,et al.  How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.