Preferences and comfort of maternal fetal medicine fellows in the United States with operative vaginal deliveries

Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to determine the current landscape of vacuum and forceps-assisted vaginal delivery (FAVD) preferences and comfort across maternal fetal medicine (MFM) fellows in the United States (U.S.). Methods A survey was sent to MFM fellowship program directors for distribution to current MFM fellows across U.S. Geographic regions, as determined using Census Bureau-designated regions. The survey looked at comfort and experience with FAVDs and vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries (VAVD) throughout their post-graduate training. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey responses. Respondents were compared by post-graduate year (PGY) and region. Results One hundred six MFM fellows (32%) completed the survey. 22.6% of MFM fellows had performed greater than 30 FAVDs, with 33% having performed ≤10 FAVDs. In comparison, 35.8% of fellows had performed more than 30 VAVDs. While 95.2% of fellows feel prepared to perform a VAVD independently, only 59.4% feel prepared to do FAVDs independently. Never the less, 53% of MFM fellows favor performing a FAVD. While some regional differences were seen, there was no significant difference in the percent of fellows by geographic region who have performed >30 FAVD (p = .87). MFM fellows in the West are most likely to have performed >30 FAVD at 57.8%, compared to 42.3, 35, and 11.4% in the Midwest, South, and Northeast, respectively. Conclusion MFM fellows are more confident with VAVD compared to FAVD. Despite feeling less confident performing FAVD (versus VAVD), the majority of MFM fellows feel comfortable performing FAVDs independently. Region of training fellowship training does not significantly affect one’s confidence in FAVDs. A coordinated nationwide effort to increase exposure to and confidence for FAVDs should be considered.

[1]  L. Kwan,et al.  Forceps-assisted vaginal delivery: the landscape of obstetrics and gynecology resident training , 2019, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[2]  M. Hanf,et al.  Outcomes of operative vaginal delivery managed by residents under supervision and attending obstetricians: a prospective cross-sectional study. , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  R. Pattinson,et al.  Global perspectives on operative vaginal deliveries. , 2019, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[4]  Y. Afshar,et al.  Simulation to Improve Trainee Skill and Comfort with Forceps-Assisted Vaginal Deliveries , 2019, American Journal of Perinatology Reports.

[5]  M. Davies-Tuck,et al.  Perinatal and Maternal Outcomes After Training Residents in Forceps Before Vacuum Instrumental Birth. , 2017, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  J. Blankstein,et al.  The Changing Scenario of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Training. , 2015, Journal of graduate medical education.

[7]  A. Bengtson,et al.  Training needs in operative obstetrics for maternal-fetal medicine fellows , 2015, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[8]  T. Metz,et al.  Does the number of forceps deliveries performed in residency predict use in practice? , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  J. Barsuk,et al.  Does Simulation-Based Medical Education With Deliberate Practice Yield Better Results Than Traditional Clinical Education? A Meta-Analytic Comparative Review of the Evidence , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[10]  T Redarce,et al.  Assessment of forceps blade orientations during their placement using an instrumented childbirth simulator , 2009, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.