Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image‐guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation

In the present paper, we describe the results of a prospective trial that compared isocenter shifts produced by BAT Ultrasound (Nomos, Sewicky, PA) to those produced by a computed tomography (CT) unit in the treatment room to aid in positioning during image‐guided radiation therapy. The trial included 15 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent CT and MR simulation immobilized supine in an Alpha Cradle and were treated with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy. BAT Ultrasound was used daily to correct for interfraction motion by obtaining shift in the x, y, and z directions. Two days per week during therapy, CT scans blinded to the ultrasound shifts were obtained and recorded. We analyzed 218 alignments from the 15 patients and observed a high level of correlation between the CT and ultrasound isocenter shifts (correlation coefficients: 0.877 anterior–posterior, 0.842 lateral, and 0.831 superior–inferior). The systematic differences were less than 1 mm, and the random differences were approximately 2 mm. The average absolute differences, including both systemic and random differences, were less than 2 mm in all directions. The isocenter shifts generated by using a CT unit in the treatment room correlate highly with shifts produced by the BAT Ultrasound system. PACS numbers: 87.53, 87.59.fm, 87.63.Df

[1]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Ultrasound-based stereotactic guidance of precision conformal external beam radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2000, Urology.

[2]  A. Hanlon,et al.  A comparison of the single and double factor high-risk models for risk assignment of prostate cancer treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Online ultrasound image guidance for radiotherapy of prostate cancer: impact of image acquisition on prostate displacement. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  A comparison of daily CT localization to a daily ultrasound-based system in prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Daily CT localization for correcting portal errors in the treatment of prostate cancer. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  S L Schoeppel,et al.  Treatment planning issues related to prostate movement in response to differential filling of the rectum and bladder. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Gary A Ezzell,et al.  Initial experience with ultrasound localization for positioning prostate cancer patients for external beam radiotherapy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Shinichi Shimizu,et al.  Three-dimensional intrafractional movement of prostate measured during real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy in supine and prone treatment positions. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  K. Langen,et al.  Organ motion and its management. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Ultrasound-based stereotactic guidance in prostate cancer--quantification of organ motion and set-up errors in external beam radiation therapy. , 2000, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[11]  Benjamin Movsas,et al.  MRI simulation: effect of gradient distortions on three-dimensional prostate cancer plans. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  E. Horwitz,et al.  To move or not to move: measurements of prostate motion by urethrography using MRI. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  J. Tsai,et al.  Implementation and utility of a daily ultrasound-based localization system with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  G Starkschall,et al.  Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Lei Dong,et al.  Experience of ultrasound-based daily prostate localization. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.