APPROXIMATE LEVEL-CROSSING PROBABILITIES FOR INTERACTIVE VISUALIZATION OF UNCERTAIN ISOCONTOURS

A major method for quantitative visualization of a scalar field is depiction of its isocontours. If the scalar field is afflicted with uncertainties, uncertain counterparts to isocontours have to be extracted and depicted. We consider the case where the input data is modeled as a discretized Gaussian field with spatial correlations. For this situation we want to compute level-crossing probabilities that are associated to grid cells. To avoid the high computational cost of Monte Carlo integrations and direction dependencies of raycasting methods, we formulate two approximations for these probabilities that can be utilized during rendering by looking up precomputed univariate and bivariate distribution functions. The first method, called maximum edge crossing probability, considers only pairwise correlations at a time. The second method, called linked-pairs method, considers joint and conditional probabilities between vertices along paths of a spanning tree over the n vertices of the grid cell; with each possible tree an n-dimensional approximate distribution is associated; the choice of the distribution is guided by minimizing its Bhattacharyya distance to the original distribution. We perform a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the approximation errors on synthetic data and show the utility of both approximations on the example of climate simulation data.

[1]  Alex T. Pang,et al.  Approaches to uncertainty visualization , 1996, The Visual Computer.

[2]  Alex T. Pang,et al.  Visualizing scalar volumetric data with uncertainty , 2002, Comput. Graph..

[3]  Chris R. Johnson,et al.  A Next Step: Visualizing Errors and Uncertainty , 2003, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[4]  Jennifer L. Dungan,et al.  Visualizing Spatial Distribution Data Sets , 2003, VisSym.

[5]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Uncertainty and Variability in Point Cloud Surface Data , 2004, PBG.

[6]  Lisa Gralewski,et al.  Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics , 2004 .

[7]  Penny Rheingans,et al.  Point-based probabilistic surfaces to show surface uncertainty , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Andrew P. Morse,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A EUROPEAN MULTIMODEL ENSEMBLE SYSTEM FOR SEASONAL-TO-INTERANNUAL PREDICTION (DEMETER) , 2004 .

[9]  T. Palmer,et al.  Development of a European Multi-Model Ensemble System for Seasonal to Inter-Annual Prediction (DEMETER) , 2004 .

[10]  Joe Michael Kniss,et al.  Statistically quantitative volume visualization , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[11]  Daniel Weiskopf,et al.  Texture-based visualization of uncertainty in flow fields , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[12]  Anders Ynnerman,et al.  Uncertainty Visualization in Medical Volume Rendering Using Probabilistic Animation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[13]  Ken Brodlie,et al.  Contouring with Uncertainty , 2008, TPCG.

[14]  Valerio Pascucci,et al.  Ensemble-Vis: A Framework for the Statistical Visualization of Ensemble Data , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops.

[15]  Björn Zehner,et al.  Visualization of gridded scalar data with uncertainty in geosciences , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[16]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Uncertain 2D Vector Field Topology , 2010, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[17]  Andrew Mercer,et al.  Noodles: A Tool for Visualization of Numerical Weather Model Ensemble Uncertainty , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[18]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Probabilistic Marching Cubes , 2011, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[19]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Positional Uncertainty of Isocontours: Condition Analysis and Probabilistic Measures , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  Rüdiger Westermann,et al.  Visualizing the Positional and Geometrical Variability of Isosurfaces in Uncertain Scalar Fields , 2011, Comput. Graph. Forum.