Exonic Splicing Mutations Are More Prevalent than Currently Estimated and Can Be Predicted by Using In Silico Tools

The identification of a causal mutation is essential for molecular diagnosis and clinical management of many genetic disorders. However, even if next-generation exome sequencing has greatly improved the detection of nucleotide changes, the biological interpretation of most exonic variants remains challenging. Moreover, particular attention is typically given to protein-coding changes often neglecting the potential impact of exonic variants on RNA splicing. Here, we used the exon 10 of MLH1, a gene implicated in hereditary cancer, as a model system to assess the prevalence of RNA splicing mutations among all single-nucleotide variants identified in a given exon. We performed comprehensive minigene assays and analyzed patient’s RNA when available. Our study revealed a staggering number of splicing mutations in MLH1 exon 10 (77% of the 22 analyzed variants), including mutations directly affecting splice sites and, particularly, mutations altering potential splicing regulatory elements (ESRs). We then used this thoroughly characterized dataset, together with experimental data derived from previous studies on BRCA1, BRCA2, CFTR and NF1, to evaluate the predictive power of 3 in silico approaches recently described as promising tools for pinpointing ESR-mutations. Our results indicate that ΔtESRseq and ΔHZEI-based approaches not only discriminate which variants affect splicing, but also predict the direction and severity of the induced splicing defects. In contrast, the ΔΨ-based approach did not show a compelling predictive power. Our data indicates that exonic splicing mutations are more prevalent than currently appreciated and that they can now be predicted by using bioinformatics methods. These findings have implications for all genetically-caused diseases.

[1]  T. Frebourg,et al.  Correction: Exonic Splicing Mutations Are More Prevalent than Currently Estimated and Can Be Predicted by Using In Silico Tools , 2016, PLoS genetics.

[2]  A. Spurdle,et al.  A review of mismatch repair gene transcripts: issues for interpretation of mRNA splicing assays , 2015, Clinical genetics.

[3]  B. Frey,et al.  The human splicing code reveals new insights into the genetic determinants of disease , 2015, Science.

[4]  E. Eskin,et al.  Integrating Functional Data to Prioritize Causal Variants in Statistical Fine-Mapping Studies , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[5]  D. Pruss,et al.  A comprehensive laboratory‐based program for classification of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer genes , 2014, Clinical genetics.

[6]  M. Widera,et al.  Genomic HEXploring allows landscaping of novel potential splicing regulatory elements , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Thierry Frebourg,et al.  The Challenge for the Next Generation of Medical Geneticists , 2014, Human mutation.

[8]  Rui Jiang,et al.  Integrating Multiple Genomic Data to Predict Disease-Causing Nonsynonymous Single Nucleotide Variants in Exome Sequencing Studies , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[9]  Rodney J Scott,et al.  Application of a 5-tiered scheme for standardized classification of 2,360 unique mismatch repair gene variants in the InSiGHT locus-specific database , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[10]  Michael R. Speicher,et al.  A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data , 2013, Briefings Bioinform..

[11]  Mustafa Tekin,et al.  The promise of whole-exome sequencing in medical genetics , 2013, Journal of Human Genetics.

[12]  T. Frebourg,et al.  Functional Analysis of a Large set of BRCA2 exon 7 Variants Highlights the Predictive Value of Hexamer Scores in Detecting Alterations of Exonic Splicing Regulatory Elements , 2013, Human mutation.

[13]  Thomas Schlitt,et al.  Predicting the functional consequences of non-synonymous DNA sequence variants--evaluation of bioinformatics tools and development of a consensus strategy. , 2013, Genomics.

[14]  Qing Wang,et al.  UMD-MLH1/MSH2/MSH6 databases: description and analysis of genetic variations in French Lynch syndrome families , 2013, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[15]  Etienne Rouleau,et al.  Multiple sequence variants of BRCA2 exon 7 alter splicing regulation , 2012, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[16]  Jean-Philippe Vert,et al.  Guidelines for splicing analysis in molecular diagnosis derived from a set of 327 combined in silico/in vitro studies on BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants , 2012, Human mutation.

[17]  D. Cooper,et al.  Loss of exon identity is a common mechanism of human inherited disease. , 2011, Genome research.

[18]  Jingyue Ju,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of all hexamers as exonic splicing elements. , 2011, Genome research.

[19]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Using positional distribution to identify splicing elements and predict pre-mRNA processing defects in human genes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Dominique Vaur,et al.  Contribution of bioinformatics predictions and functional splicing assays to the interpretation of unclassified variants of the BRCA genes , 2011, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[21]  A. Gonzalez-Perez,et al.  Improving the assessment of the outcome of nonsynonymous SNVs with a consensus deleteriousness score, Condel. , 2011, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  Peter Johnson,et al.  Prediction of single‐nucleotide substitutions that result in exon skipping: identification of a splicing silencer in BRCA1 exon 6 , 2011, Human mutation.

[23]  Melissa S. Cline,et al.  Using bioinformatics to predict the functional impact of SNVs , 2011, Bioinform..

[24]  R. Touraine,et al.  A rare SMN2 variant in a previously unrecognized composite splicing regulatory element induces exon 7 inclusion and reduces the clinical severity of spinal muscular atrophy , 2010, Human mutation.

[25]  T. Frebourg,et al.  Use of splicing reporter minigene assay to evaluate the effect on splicing of unclassified genetic variants. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.

[26]  Y. Hua,et al.  A positive modifier of spinal muscular atrophy in the SMN2 gene. , 2009, American journal of human genetics.

[27]  D. Baralle,et al.  Missed threads , 2009, EMBO reports.

[28]  C. Béroud,et al.  Human Splicing Finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  J. Tazi,et al.  A large fraction of unclassified variants of the mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 is associated with splicing defects , 2008, Human mutation.

[30]  F. Couch,et al.  Prediction and assessment of splicing alterations: implications for clinical testing , 2008, Human mutation.

[31]  Fei Liu,et al.  Tau exon 10 alternative splicing and tauopathies , 2008, Molecular Neurodegeneration.

[32]  G. Guanti,et al.  In silico and in vivo splicing analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 missense mutations shows exon- and tissue-specific effects , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[33]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  An increased specificity score matrix for the prediction of SF2/ASF-specific exonic splicing enhancers. , 2006, Human molecular genetics.

[34]  D. Baralle,et al.  NF1 mRNA biogenesis: Effect of the genomic milieu in splicing regulation of the NF1 exon 37 region , 2006, FEBS letters.

[35]  Qing Wang,et al.  Systematic mRNA analysis for the effect of MLH1 and MSH2 missense and silent mutations on aberrant splicing , 2006, Human mutation.

[36]  M. Raponi,et al.  Synonymous mutations in CFTR exon 12 affect splicing and are not neutral in evolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Jinhua Wang,et al.  ESEfinder: a web resource to identify exonic splicing enhancers , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[38]  J. Trojan,et al.  N‐terminus of hMLH1 confers interaction of hMutLα and hMutLβ with hMutSα , 2003 .

[39]  Teresa Casals,et al.  New type of disease causing mutations: the example of the composite exonic regulatory elements of splicing in CFTR exon 12. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[40]  J. Trojan,et al.  N-terminus of hMLH1 confers interaction of hMutLalpha and hMutLbeta with hMutSalpha. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  A. Krainer,et al.  Listening to silence and understanding nonsense: exonic mutations that affect splicing , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[42]  A. Viel,et al.  Characterization of MLH1 and MSH2 alternative splicing and its relevance to molecular testing of colorectal cancer susceptibility , 1998, Human Genetics.

[43]  T. Frebourg,et al.  Alternative splicing of MLH1 messenger RNA in human normal cells. , 1995, Cancer research.

[44]  P. Sharp,et al.  Exon amplification: a strategy to isolate mammalian genes based on RNA splicing. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  S. Ho,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. , 1989, Gene.