Analysis of the bending behaviour of porcine xenograft leaflets and of natural aortic valve material: bending stiffness, neutral axis and shear measurements.

Flexibility of the materials used in the construction of bioprosthetic heart valves is essential for proper valve operation. We therefore examined the bending behaviour of glutaraldehyde treated porcine aortic valve cusps in comparison with fresh aortic valve tissue. We repeatedly bent a total of 35 strips of fresh and treated tissue to curvatures ranging from 0.2 to 2.2 mm-1. We compared the stiffness of the two materials between circumferential and radial bending, natural and reverse curvatures and constant or variable tensile stress (0.8-40 kPa). Our results showed a weak positive relationship between bending stiffness and applied tensile stress and a strong positive dependance of stiffness on tissue thickness (t). For the fresh tissue, the bending stiffness increased in proportion to t1.14 while for the glutaraldehyde treated tissue it increased with t2.18. Fourteen strips of fresh and treated tissue were also histologically processed, sectioned and examined with polarized light microscopy. Collagen fiber wavelengths and shear deformations were measured utilizing the tissue banding patterns produced by polarized light microscopy. The neutral axis of bending was found to lie very close to the outer surface of the tissue, suggesting that aortic leaflets have a very low compressive elastic modulus. The shear strains measured in fresh tissue were 10 +/- 2.7% vs 3 +/- 4.4% for the treated, indicating a stiffening of the tissue following glutaraldehyde fixation. We conclude that both natural and bioprosthetic valve cusps have a complex flexural behaviour that cannot be modeled using simple bending principles, although the bioprosthetic material more closely approximates the simple beam than does the fresh. The non-linear elastic modulus, high compressibility and shearing between fiber layers are likely responsible for the observed behaviour of the fresh tissue, while the cross-linking and dehydrating effects of glutaraldehyde are believed to be responsible for the alteration in bending properties observed in the treated tissue. Our study suggests that bioprosthetic valve material does not adequately mimic the mechanics of the natural valve tissue, and that the current glutaraldehyde fixation process eliminates many of the beneficial, stress-reducing properties of the aortic leaflet.

[1]  F. Nistal,et al.  Six- to ten-year follow-up of patients with the Hancock cardiac bioprosthesis. Incidence of primary tissue valve failure. , 1986, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves. , 1983, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  R I Jennrich,et al.  Fitting nonlinear models to data. , 1979, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[4]  D R Boughner,et al.  The glutaraldehyde-stabilized porcine aortic valve xenograft. II. Effect of fixation with or without pressure on the tensile viscoelastic properties of the leaflet material. , 1984, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  M Jones,et al.  Calcific deposits in porcine bioprostheses: structure and pathogenesis. , 1980, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  B. Chaitman,et al.  Late tears in leaflets of porcine bioprostheses in adults. , 1984, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  B. M. Chapman An Apparatus for Measuring Bending and Torsional Stress-Strain-Time Relations of Single Fibers , 1971 .

[8]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  The Elastic Modulus of Canine Aortic Valve Leaflets in Vivo and in Vitro , 1980, Circulation research.

[9]  M Jones,et al.  Structure and classification of cuspal tears and perforations in porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves implanted in patients. , 1981, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  E. Baer,et al.  Collagen; ultrastructure and its relation to mechanical properties as a function of ageing , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[11]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  Stresses of natural versus prosthetic aortic valve leaflets in vivo. , 1980, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  M. S. Hamid,et al.  Influence of stent height upon stresses on the cusps of closed bioprosthetic valves. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Paul D. Stein,et al.  Finite element evaluation of stresses on closed leaflets of bioprosthetic heart valves with flexible stents , 1985 .

[14]  N. Broom,et al.  Fatigue-induced damage in glutaraldehyde-preserved heart valve tissue. , 1978, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  D R Boughner,et al.  Quantitative structural analysis of collagen in chordae tendineae and its relation to floppy mitral valves and proteoglycan infiltration. , 1987, British heart journal.

[16]  D G Ellis,et al.  Cross-sectional area measurements for tendon specimens: a comparison of several methods. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  F. J. Thomson,et al.  Influence of fixation conditions on the performance of glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic valves: towards a more scientific basis. , 1979, Thorax.

[18]  M. S. Hamid,et al.  Mechanical stresses on closed cusps of porcine bioprosthetic valves: correlation with sites of calcification. , 1986, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  A. Barker,et al.  A study of the effects of glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde on the mechanical behaviour of bovine pericardium. , 1982, Biomaterials.

[20]  E. Trowbridge,et al.  The standardisation of gauge length: its influence on the relative extensibility of natural and chemically modified pericardium. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  A method for analysis of bending and shearing deformations in biological tissue. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  I Vesely,et al.  A multipurpose tissue bending machine. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  R. E. Clark,et al.  Scanning and light microscopy of human aortic leaflets in stressed and relaxed states. , 1974, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  N. Broom,et al.  The stress/strain and fatigue behaviour of glutaraldehyde preserved heart-valve tissue. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  B. M. Chapman 24—THE BENDING STRESS-STRAIN PROPERTIES OF SINGLE FIBRES AND THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY , 1973 .

[26]  N. Broom,et al.  An 'in vitro' study of mechanical fatigue in glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic valve tissue. , 1980, Biomaterials.

[27]  R. T. Eppink,et al.  Stress analysis of porcine bioprosthetic heart valves in vivo. , 1982, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[28]  I Vesely,et al.  Tissue buckling as a mechanism of bioprosthetic valve failure. , 1988, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[29]  V. Ferrans,et al.  Optical methods for the nondestructive evaluation of collagen morphology in bioprosthetic heart valves. , 1986, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[30]  G Thiene,et al.  Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[31]  D R Boughner,et al.  The glutaraldehyde-stabilized porcine aortic valve xenograft. I. Tensile viscoelastic properties of the fresh leaflet material. , 1984, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[32]  C. Duran,et al.  Degeneration in porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves: incidence of primary tissue failures among 938 bioprostheses at risk. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  Patterns of calcific deposits in operatively excised stenotic or purely regurgitant aortic valves and their relation to mechanical stress. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[34]  S. Gabbay,et al.  Do heart valve bioprostheses degenerate for metabolic or mechanical reasons? , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[35]  F. Nistal,et al.  Incidence of primary tissue valve failure with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve. Preliminary results. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[36]  E A Trowbridge,et al.  Pericardial heterograft valves: an assessment of leaflet stresses and their implications for heart valve design. , 1987, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[37]  A A Sauren,et al.  Elastic and viscoelastic material behaviour of fresh and glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic valve tissue. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  A A Sauren,et al.  The mechanical properties of porcine aortic valve tissues. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  M. S. Hamid,et al.  Estimation of mechanical stresses on closed cusps of porcine bioprosthetic valves: effects of stiffening, focal calcium and focal thinning. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[40]  Y C Fung,et al.  Biaxial mechanical properties of the pericardium in normal and volume overload dogs. , 1985, The American journal of physiology.

[41]  W. Roberts,et al.  Structural changes in glutaraldehyde-treated porcine heterografts used as substitute cardiac valves. Transmission and scanning electron microscopic observations in 12 patients. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.