A Web-Based, Population-Based Cirrhosis Identification and Management System for Improving Cirrhosis Care: Qualitative Formative Evaluation

Background Cirrhosis, or scarring of the liver, is a debilitating condition that affects millions of US adults. Early identification, linkage to care, and retention of care are critical for preventing severe complications and death from cirrhosis. Objective The purpose of this study is to conduct a preimplementation formative evaluation to identify factors that could impact implementation of the Population-Based Cirrhosis Identification and Management System (P-CIMS) in clinics serving patients with cirrhosis. P-CIMS is a web-based informatics tool designed to facilitate patient outreach and cirrhosis care management. Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted between January and May 2016 with frontline providers in liver disease and primary care clinics at 3 Veterans Health Administration medical centers. A total of 10 providers were interviewed, including 8 physicians and midlevel providers from liver-related specialty clinics and 2 primary care providers who managed patients with cirrhosis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided the development of the interview guides. Inductive consensus coding and content analysis were used to analyze transcribed interviews and abstracted coded passages, elucidated themes, and insights. Results The following themes and subthemes emerged from the analyses: outer setting: needs and resources for patients with cirrhosis; inner setting: readiness for implementation (subthemes: lack of resources, lack of leadership support), and implementation climate (subtheme: competing priorities); characteristics of individuals: role within clinic; knowledge and beliefs about P-CIMS (subtheme: perceived and realized benefits; useful features; suggestions for improvement); and perceptions of current practices in managing cirrhosis cases (subthemes: preimplementation process for identifying and linking patients to cirrhosis care; structural and social barriers to follow-up). Overall, P-CIMS was viewed as a powerful tool for improving linkage and retention, but its integration in the clinical workflow required leadership support, time, and staffing. Providers also cited the need for more intuitive interface elements to enhance usability. Conclusions P-CIMS shows promise as a powerful tool for identifying, linking, and retaining care in patients living with cirrhosis. The current evaluation identified several improvements and advantages of P-CIMS over current care processes and provides lessons for others implementing similar population-based identification and management tools in populations with chronic disease.

[1]  Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi,et al.  Key methodological considerations for usability testing of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems , 2019, Quality of Life Research.

[2]  Michael Volk,et al.  Development of Quality Measures in Cirrhosis by the Practice Metrics Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases , 2019, Hepatology.

[3]  S. Asch,et al.  Implementation of a Population‐Based Cirrhosis Identification and Management System , 2018, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[4]  C. Kruse,et al.  Health Information Technology Continues to Show Positive Effect on Medical Outcomes: Systematic Review , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Brian G. Arndt,et al.  Tethered to the EHR: Primary Care Physician Workload Assessment Using EHR Event Log Data and Time-Motion Observations , 2017, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[6]  Joseph C. Kvedar,et al.  Why Real-World Results Are So Challenging for Digital Health , 2017 .

[7]  D. Fitzmaurice,et al.  Predicting risk of undiagnosed COPD: development and validation of the TargetCOPD score , 2017, European Respiratory Journal.

[8]  C. del Rio,et al.  Patient Tracking as a Tool to Improve Retention in Care: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? , 2017, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[9]  Naihua Duan,et al.  Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research , 2015, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[10]  J. Talwalkar,et al.  Improving quality of health care for patients with cirrhosis. , 2014, Gastroenterology.

[11]  Marc Fleurbaey,et al.  Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis , 2014, Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation.

[12]  Lucy Savitz,et al.  Challenges in Using Electronic Health Record Data for CER: Experience of 4 Learning Organizations and Solutions Applied , 2013, Medical care.

[13]  M. Volk,et al.  Multidisciplinary management of patients with cirrhosis: a need for care coordination. , 2013, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[14]  Vijay Garla,et al.  EMR-linked cancer tracker facilitates lung and liver cancer care. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  M. V. van Stralen,et al.  The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[16]  J. Lowery,et al.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[17]  Marsha E Fonteyn,et al.  Developing a codebook to guide content analysis of expressive writing transcripts. , 2008, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[18]  H. El‐Serag,et al.  The validity of viral hepatitis and chronic liver disease diagnoses in Veterans Affairs administrative databases , 2007, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[19]  L. Faulkner Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[20]  Ronald J. Chenail,et al.  Interviewing the Investigator: Strategies for Addressing Instrumentation and Researcher Bias Concerns in Qualitative Research. , 2011 .

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  Excerpts from : The Discovery of Grounded Theory : Strategies for Qualitative Research , 2008 .

[22]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .