Inventor networks in emerging key technologies: information technology vs. semiconductors

This paper analyzes the development of the German knowledge base measured by co-classifications of patents by German inventors and relate this technological development to changes in the structure of the underlying inventor networks. The central hypothesis states that technologies that become more central to the knowledge base are also characterized by a higher connectedness of the inventor network. The theoretical considerations are exemplified in a comparative study of two patenting fields—information technology and semiconductors. It turns out that information technology shows the highest increases in patents, but only a moderate move towards the center of the knowledge base. By contrast, semiconductors develops towards a key technology, despite a moderate increase in the number of patents. The dynamic analysis of inventor networks in both fields shows an increasing connectedness and the emergence of a large component in semiconductors, but not in information technology, which is in line with the expectations.

[1]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Structural holes, innovation and the distribution of ideas , 2007 .

[2]  R. Cowan,et al.  Merit, approbation and the evolution of social structure , 2005 .

[3]  F. Lissoni.  Academic inventors as brokers , 2010 .

[4]  S. Winter,et al.  Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence , 1994 .

[5]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[6]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[7]  S. Breschi,et al.  Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data , 2004 .

[8]  Guido Buenstorf,et al.  Evolution on the Shoulders of Giants: Entrepreneurship and Firm Survival in the German Laser Industry , 2007 .

[9]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Interindustry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth: A Reexamination , 1984 .

[10]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[11]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[12]  D. Crane.  Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the "Invisible College" Hypothesis , 1969 .

[13]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  Pavitt'S Taxonomy Sixteen Years On: A Review Article , 2001 .

[14]  O. Sorenson.  Social networks and industrial geography , 2003 .

[15]  Knut Blind,et al.  The Influence of Strategic Patenting on Companies' Patent Portfolios , 2009 .

[16]  Daniel K. N. Johnson,et al.  It?s a Small(er) World: The Role of Geography and Networks in Biotechnology Innovation , 2002 .

[17]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[18]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[19]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Social Networks as Drivers of Knowledge Diffusion , 2003 .

[20]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers☆ , 1989 .

[21]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  Cooperation and specialization in German technology regions , 2004 .

[22]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[23]  Orietta Marsili,et al.  The fruit flies of innovations: A taxonomy of innovative small firms , 2006 .

[24]  S. Klepper,et al.  Submarkets and the evolution of market structure , 2006 .

[25]  P. Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment , 2005 .

[26]  F. Malerba,et al.  Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification , 2003 .

[27]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Coherence of the Knowledge Base and the Firm's Innovative Performance: Evidence from the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry , 2005 .

[28]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[29]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists' and inventors' networks , 2010 .

[30]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[31]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[32]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Heritage and Agglomeration: The Akron Tyre Cluster Revisited , 2009 .

[33]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Patents, Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers in Europe , 2009 .

[34]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[35]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[36]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Inter-Industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth , 1982 .

[37]  A. Leiponen,et al.  What exactly are technological regimes?: Intra-industry heterogeneity in the organization of innovation activities , 2007 .

[38]  Olle Persson,et al.  Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialties , 1995, Scientometrics.

[39]  K. Blind,et al.  Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany , 2006 .

[40]  Charlie Karlsson,et al.  Interregional Inventor Networks as Studied by Patent Co-inventorships , 2006 .

[41]  J. Moody.  The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 , 2004 .

[42]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Small Worlds and Regional Innovation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[43]  A. Marshall.  Principles of Economics , .

[44]  Koen Frenken,et al.  The Evolution of Inventor Networks in the silicon Valley and Boston Regions , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..

[45]  S H Strogatz,et al.  Random graph models of social networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[47]  Derek J. de Solla Price,et al.  "Little Science, Big Science", Derek J. de Solla Price, New York-London 1963 : [recenzja] / Janusz Thor. , 1964 .

[48]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities , 1997 .

[49]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  On the dynamics of generation and utilisation of knowledge: The local character of knowledge , 2007 .

[50]  S. Breschi,et al.  Mobility of Skilled Workers and Co-Invention Networks: An Anatomy of Localized Knowledge Flows , 2009 .

[51]  Anne L. J. Ter Wal,et al.  Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy , 2007 .

[52]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[53]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Social Networks, Informational Complexity and Industrial Geography* , 2005 .

[54]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[55]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Firm knowledge and market value in biotechnology , 2006 .

[56]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  The Network of Innovators in Jena: An Application of Social Network Analysis , 2006 .

[57]  Robin Cowan,et al.  The dynamics of collective invention , 2003 .

[58]  M. Beckmann,et al.  Economics of Knowledge: Theory, Models and Measurements , 2009 .

[59]  Benjamin F. Jones.  The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[60]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[61]  S. Klepper.  Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[62]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm , 1998 .

[63]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .