Information Technology Capabilities and SMEs Performance: An Understanding of a Multi-Mediation Model for the Manufacturing Sector

Aim/Purpose: Despite the fact that the plethora of studies demonstrate the positive impact of information technology (IT) capabilities on SMEs performance, the understanding of underlying mechanisms through which IT capabilities affect the firm performance is not yet clear. This study fills these gaps by explaining the roles of absorptive capacity and corporate entrepreneurship. The study also elaborates the effect of IT capability dimensions (IT integration and IT alignment) upon the SMEs performance outcomes through the mediating sequential process of absorptive capacity and corporate entrepreneurship. Methodology: This study empirically tests a theoretical model based on the Dynamic Capability View (DCV), by using the partial least square (PLS) technique with a sample of 489 manufacturing SMEs in Pakistan. A survey is employed for the data collection by following the cluster sampling approach. Contribution: This research contributes to the literature of IT by bifurcating the IT capability into two dimensions, IT integration and IT alignment, which allows us to distinguish between different sources of IT capabilities. Additionally, our findings shed the light on the dynamic capability view by theoretically and empirically demonstrating how absorptive capacity and corporate entrepreneurship sequentially affect the firms' performance outcomes. At last, this study contributes to the literature of SMEs by measuring the two levels of performance: innovation performance and firm performance. Findings: The results of the analysis show that the absorptive capacity and the corporate entrepreneurship significantly mediate the relationship between both dimensions of IT capability and performance outcomes.

[1]  Selim Zaim,et al.  Information system capabilities and firm performance: Opening the black box through decision-making performance and business-process performance , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[2]  M. Stoffels,et al.  THE IMPACT OF IT ASSETS ON INNOVATION PERFORMANCE – THE MEDIATING ROLE OF DEVELOPMENTAL CULTURE AND ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY , 2018, International Journal of Innovation Management.

[3]  Radu V. Craiu,et al.  Vine Copulas for Imputation of Monotone Non‐response , 2018 .

[4]  V. García-Morales,et al.  Analysis of the influence of the environment, stakeholder integration capability, absorptive capacity, and technological skills on organizational performance through corporate entrepreneurship , 2018 .

[5]  V. García-Morales,et al.  Influence of Technological Assets on Organizational Performance through Absorptive Capacity, Organizational Innovation and Internal Labour Flexibility , 2018 .

[6]  T. Lu,et al.  Sustaining Innovation Performance in SMEs: Exploring the Roles of Strategic Entrepreneurship and IT Capabilities , 2018 .

[7]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  Social web knowledge sharing and innovation performance in knowledge-intensive manufacturing SMEs , 2017 .

[8]  Paolo Neirotti,et al.  On the contingent value of IT-based capabilities for the competitive advantage of SMEs: Mechanisms and empirical evidence , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Janice Jones,et al.  KNOWLEDGE INFLOWS FROM MARKET- AND SCIENCE-BASED ACTORS, ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY, INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE — A STUDY OF SMEs , 2016 .

[10]  U. Lichtenthaler.  Determinants of absorptive capacity: the value of technology and market orientation for external knowledge acquisition , 2016 .

[11]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Big Data and supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis , 2016, Annals of Operations Research.

[12]  L. Raymond,et al.  IT-enabled Knowledge Management for the Competitive Performance of Manufacturing SMEs: An Absorptive Capacity-based View , 2016 .

[13]  Cemal Zehir,et al.  Linking Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Role of Differentiation Strategy and Innovation Performance☆ , 2015 .

[14]  Nicholas H. Roberts.  Absorptive capacity, organizational antecedents, and environmental dynamism , 2015 .

[15]  V. Parida,et al.  Interactive Effects of Network Capability, ICT Capability, and Financial Slack on Technology‐Based Small Firm Innovation Performance , 2015 .

[16]  Gang Kou,et al.  IT capabilities and product innovation performance: The roles of corporate entrepreneurship and competitive intensity , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Ramiro Montealegre,et al.  Information Technology Use as a Learning Mechanism: The Impact of IT Use on Knowledge Transfer Effectiveness, Absorptive Capacity, and Franchisee Performance , 2015, MIS Q..

[18]  Hammad Akbar,et al.  Absorptive capacity and performance: The role of customer relationship and technological capabilities in high-tech SMEs , 2015 .

[19]  Rüdiger Kabst,et al.  Corporate entrepreneurship and performance: A meta-analysis , 2015 .

[20]  V. García-Morales,et al.  Technological variables and absorptive capacity's influence on performance through corporate entrepreneurship , 2014 .

[21]  H. Beheshti,et al.  Supply chain integration and firm performance: an empirical study of Swedish manufacturing firms , 2014 .

[22]  Carol Kline,et al.  Science and industry: Sharing knowledge for innovation , 2014 .

[23]  S. Mann.  Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach , 2013 .

[24]  Ciaran Heavey,et al.  Top Management Compositional Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderating Role of Perceived Technological Uncertainty , 2013 .

[25]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  Industry technical committees, technological distance, and innovation performance , 2013 .

[26]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing , 2012 .

[27]  Víctor J. García-Morales,et al.  Technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning: Effects on organizational innovation to improve firm performance , 2012 .

[28]  Susana Pérez López,et al.  Information Technology Competency, Knowledge Processes and Firm Performance , 2012, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[29]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  IT and Entrepreneurism: An On-Again, Off-Again Love Affair or a Marriage? , 2011 .

[30]  Ramesh Sharda,et al.  Knowledge work and communication challenges in networked enterprises , 2011, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[31]  Andy Neely,et al.  Inventors and Entrepreneurs in Academia: What Types of Skills and Experience Matter? , 2011 .

[32]  Surajit Chaudhuri,et al.  An overview of business intelligence technology , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[33]  Gi Mun Kim,et al.  IT Capabilities, Process-Oriented Dynamic Capabilities, and Firm Financial Performance , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[34]  S. Lin,et al.  Configuring a corporate venturing portfolio to create growth value: Within-portfolio diversity and strategic linkage , 2011 .

[35]  Luis M. Molina,et al.  Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity , 2011 .

[36]  D. Jiménez-Jiménez,et al.  Innovation, organizational learning, and performance , 2011 .

[37]  Masaaki Kotabe,et al.  Managerial ties, knowledge acquisition, realized absorptive capacity and new product market performance of emerging multinational companies: A case of China , 2011 .

[38]  Ciaran Heavey,et al.  The mediating role of knowledge‐based capital for corporate entrepreneurship effects on performance: A study of small‐ to medium‐sized firms , 2011 .

[39]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Examining the Strategic Alignment and Implementation Success of a KMS: A Subculture-Based Multilevel Analysis , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship , 2010 .

[41]  Varun Grover,et al.  Building and leveraging information in dynamic environments: The role of IT infrastructure flexibility as enabler of organizational responsiveness and competitive advantage , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[42]  Arun Rai,et al.  Leveraging IT Capabilities and Competitive Process Capabilities for the Management of Interorganizational Relationship Portfolios , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  The 'Third Hand': IT-Enabled Competitive Advantage in Turbulence Through Improvisational Capabilities , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  Marina Apaydin,et al.  A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2010 .

[45]  Dinesh A. Mirchandani,et al.  Dynamics of the Importance of IS/IT Skills , 2010, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Eileen Spencer,et al.  Absorptive Capacity in a Non-Market Environment , 2010 .

[47]  John A. Pearce,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Performance of Religious Congregations as Predicted by Rational Choice Theory , 2010 .

[48]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  The role of an entrepreneurially alert information system in promoting corporate entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[49]  Mike Wright,et al.  Corporate entrepreneurship: Current research and future directions , 2009 .

[50]  C.-J. Chen,et al.  Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance: the mediating role of knowledge management capacity , 2009 .

[51]  Kira Fabrizio.  Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation , 2009 .

[52]  R. Ireland,et al.  Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy , 2009 .

[53]  Chiara Francalanci,et al.  IS integration and business performance: The mediation effect of organizational absorptive capacity in SMEs , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[54]  Brooks C. Holtom,et al.  Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research , 2008 .

[55]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Does knowledge reuse make a creative person more creative? , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[56]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[57]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[58]  Boris Durisin,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization , 2007 .

[59]  Francisco Javier Lloréns Montes,et al.  Effects of Technology Absorptive Capacity and Technology Proactivity on Organizational Learning, Innovation and Performance: An Empirical Examination , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[60]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Impact of Product, Market, and Relationship Characteristics on Interorganizational System Integration in Manufacturer-Supplier Dyads , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[61]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Innovating Business Models with Co-Development Partnerships , 2007 .

[62]  P. Ahmed,et al.  Relationships between Innovation Stimulus, Innovation Capacity, and Innovation Performance , 2006 .

[63]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[64]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[65]  S. Thornhill.  Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes , 2006 .

[66]  Dovev Lavie.  The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View , 2006 .

[67]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[68]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-Enabled Market Knowledge Creation , 2005, MIS Q..

[69]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[70]  G. T. Lumpkin,et al.  The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Stimulating Effective Corporate Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[71]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis , 2004 .

[72]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[73]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF THE USE OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 2004 .

[74]  Lynne P. Cooper,et al.  Knowledge Reuse for Innovation , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[75]  Abdelkader Daghfous,et al.  Organizational learning, knowledge and technology transfer: a case study , 2004 .

[76]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  The Effects of Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces on Product Development Speed and Quality: How Does Problem Solving Matter? , 2003 .

[77]  Morgan P. Miles,et al.  Modeling corporate entrepreneurship as rent-seeking competition , 2003 .

[78]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[79]  Grover S. Kearns,et al.  A Resource-Based View of Strategic IT Alignment: How Knowledge Sharing Creates Competitive Advantage , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[80]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[81]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[82]  James R. Lindner,et al.  HANDLING NONRESPONSE IN SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH , 2001 .

[83]  R. Hisrich,et al.  Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation , 2001 .

[84]  George P. Huber,et al.  Transfer of knowledge in knowledge management systems: unexplored issues and suggested studies , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[85]  E. Autio,et al.  SOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS , 2001 .

[86]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[87]  David de Vaus,et al.  Research Design in Social Research , 2001 .

[88]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  Impact of Information Technology Management Practices on Customer Service , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[89]  Andrew C. Inkpen.  Learning Through Joint Ventures: A Framework Of Knowledge Acquisition , 2000 .

[90]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[91]  Shanthi Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Unraveling the links between dimensions of innovation and organizational performance , 2000 .

[92]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[93]  Ada Leiponen.  Competencies, Innovation And Profitability Of Firms , 2000 .

[94]  Jerry N. Luftman,et al.  Achieving and Sustaining Business-IT Alignment , 1999 .

[95]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Sourcing strategies of U.S. service companies : A modified transaction-cost analysis , 1999 .

[96]  P. Roberts.  Product innovation, product–market competition and persistent profitability in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1999 .

[97]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Defining the Family Business by Behavior , 1999 .

[98]  Donald P. Schwab,et al.  Research Methods for Organizational Studies , 1998 .

[99]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[100]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[101]  David Lei,et al.  Dynamic Core Competences through Meta-Learning and Strategic Context , 1996 .

[102]  Alison M. Konrad,et al.  Formalized Hrm Structures: Coordinating Equal Employment Opportunity Or Concealing Organizational Practices? , 1995 .

[103]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[104]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Measurement of Business Economic Performance: An Examination of Method Convergence , 1987 .

[105]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[106]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory , 1982 .

[107]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[108]  A. Taha,et al.  Impact of Information Technology Capabilities On Firm Performance: Understanding the Mediating Role of Corporate Entrepreneurship In SMEs , 2018 .

[109]  Shane Mathews,et al.  SME international performance in Latin America: The role of entrepreneurial and technological capabilities , 2016 .

[110]  Neda Abasi,et al.  Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable , 2015 .

[111]  Hung-Tai Tsou,et al.  Performance effects of IT capability, service process innovation, and the mediating role of customer service , 2012 .

[112]  James H. Love,et al.  Innovation, productivity and growth in US business services: a firm-level analysis , 2008 .

[113]  Ralf W. Seifert,et al.  Building Partnerships: Reinventing Oracle’s Go-to-Market Strategy , 2003 .

[114]  J. Gliem,et al.  Calculating, Interpreting, And Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient For Likert-Type Scales , 2003 .

[115]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[116]  John W. Graham,et al.  Analysis With Missing Data in Prevention Research , 1997 .

[117]  S. Zahra,et al.  Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis , 1995 .