Performance Improvement of Perturb and Observe Maximum Power Point Tracking Technique for Solar PV Applications

The renewable energy market has increased significantly over the last decade, and the solar photovoltaic (PV) power generation is becoming important in many countries globally with a particular interest in the field of distributed electric power generation. A regular and accurate examination and evaluation of the photovoltaic system performance and efficiency are very essential in the sense that they provide vital information of the system’s quality evaluation for the users, installers, as well as the manufacturers. The maximum power point of a solar panel varies with the irradiation and temperature and the control algorithms are commonly used for the maximization of the power extraction from PV arrays known as maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms. Perturb and Observe (P&O) algorithm is one of the popular techniques frequently used due to its easy implementation and low cost. The MPPT technique is mainly used for obtaining the maximum power from the solar PV module and conversion circuit to the load and improving the power quality of PV power generation for grid connection. Perturb and Observe maximum power point tracking (MPPT) is extensively used in charge controllers for extracting maximum power from photovoltaic (PV) module irrespective of irradiance, temperature and load variation. The standard P&O MPPT technique has drawbacks bordering on fast convergence time to a maximum power point, poor system response to fast-changing irradiance and steady-state oscillation with a fixed step size. This chapter discusses the detailed operation and implementation of an improved P&O algorithm technique to resolve the various challenges of the standard P&O algorithm. This technique segments the operational region of the PV array into four operating sectors based on the sector location from the maximum power point (MPP), step size modifications are implemented. Furthermore, the critical comparison is made between the new P&O method and the standard P&O method. Finally, the hardware implementation of both MPPT algorithms is discussed in order to evaluate their performance and efficiency. The measured results show that the average efficiency of the proposed system is 96.89% which is more than 4% higher than the standard system.

[1]  M. Vitelli,et al.  Power Electronics and Control Techniques for Maximum Energy Harvesting in Photovoltaic Systems , 2012 .

[2]  David J. Atkinson,et al.  Experimental investigation of the incremental conductance maximum power point tracking algorithm at high perturbation rates , 2016 .

[3]  Y. Al-Turki,et al.  A review on maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems with and without shading conditions , 2017 .

[4]  Z. Salam,et al.  An improved perturb and observe (P&O) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm for higher efficiency , 2015 .

[5]  Chee Wei Tan,et al.  Analysis of perturb and observe maximum power point tracking algorithm for photovoltaic applications , 2008, 2008 IEEE 2nd International Power and Energy Conference.

[6]  Luigi Piegari,et al.  Optimized Adaptive Perturb and Observe Maximum Power Point Tracking Control for Photovoltaic Generation , 2015 .

[7]  Hocine Belmili,et al.  A survey of the most used MPPT methods: Conventional and advanced algorithms applied for photovoltaic systems , 2015 .

[8]  Kok Soon Tey,et al.  Modified incremental conductance MPPT algorithm to mitigate inaccurate responses under fast-changing solar irradiation level , 2014 .

[9]  Chitta Saha,et al.  Modelling and performance analysis of a silicon PV module , 2017 .

[10]  Li Zhijun,et al.  Energy Performance and Cost Comparison of MPPT Techniques for Photovoltaics and other Applications , 2017 .

[11]  Kashif Ishaque,et al.  The performance of perturb and observe and incremental conductance maximum power point tracking method under dynamic weather conditions , 2014 .

[12]  José Manuel Andújar,et al.  A reliable, fast and low cost maximum power point tracker for photovoltaic applications , 2010 .

[13]  Muhammad Kamran,et al.  Implementation of improved Perturb & Observe MPPT technique with confined search space for standalone photovoltaic system , 2020 .

[14]  N. Rajasekar,et al.  A comprehensive review on solar PV maximum power point tracking techniques , 2017 .

[15]  Rachid Outbib,et al.  General review and classification of different MPPT Techniques , 2017 .

[16]  Ali M. Eltamaly,et al.  A novel evaluation index for the photovoltaic maximum power point tracker techniques , 2018, Solar Energy.

[17]  Awang Jusoh,et al.  Modified Perturb and Observe (P&O) with checking algorithm under various solar irradiation , 2017 .

[18]  Saad Mekhilef,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Maximum Power Point Tracking Approaches and Photovoltaic Systems , 2018 .

[19]  K Kumar,et al.  Design and Analysis of Modified Single P&O MPPT Control Algorithm for a Standalone Hybrid Solar and Wind Energy Conversion System , 2017 .

[20]  C. Larbes,et al.  A review of global maximum power point tracking techniques of photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[21]  Seyed Mohammad Sadeghzadeh,et al.  A high performance maximum power point tracker for PV systems , 2013 .

[22]  Syed A.M. Said,et al.  The effect of environmental factors and dust accumulation on photovoltaic modules and dust-accumulation mitigation strategies , 2018 .

[23]  Ersan Kabalci,et al.  Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) Algorithms for Photovoltaic Systems , 2017 .

[24]  Moshe Sitbon,et al.  Revisited Perturbation Frequency Design Guideline for Direct Fixed-Step Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[25]  M. A. Abdourraziq,et al.  Modified P&O MPPT technique for photovoltaic systems , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA).

[26]  Ali M. Eltamaly,et al.  Hybrid PSO-FLC for dynamic global peak extraction of the partially shaded photovoltaic system , 2018, PloS one.

[27]  Sabir Messalti,et al.  Simulation and experimental design of a new advanced variable step size Incremental Conductance MPPT algorithm for PV systems. , 2016, ISA transactions.

[28]  Soubhagya Kumar Dash,et al.  Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques: Recapitulation in solar photovoltaic systems , 2016 .

[29]  M. Tech Scholar,et al.  MODELING & ANALYSIS OF STANDALONE PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM , 2013 .

[30]  Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman,et al.  Influence of Dirt Accumulation on Performance of PV Panels , 2014 .

[31]  Ilhami Colak,et al.  Photovoltaic maximum power point tracking under fast varying of solar radiation , 2016 .

[32]  Xiaoli Meng,et al.  A review of maximum power point tracking methods of PV power system at uniform and partial shading , 2016 .

[33]  Z. Salam,et al.  A Modified P&O Maximum Power Point Tracking Method With Reduced Steady-State Oscillation and Improved Tracking Efficiency , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[34]  Richu Zachariah,et al.  Variable step size Perturb and observe MPPT algorithm for standalone solar photovoltaic system , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Techniques in Control, Optimization and Signal Processing (INCOS).