Greenhouse gas emissions, dry matter intake and feed efficiency of young Holstein bulls

Abstract Livestock farming is directly responsible for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, mainly due to enteric fermentation. Feed efficiency in livestock species is generally evaluated through feed conversion ratio (FCR) and residual feed intake (RFI), which are associated to GHG emissions. The aim of this study was to characterise FCR and RFI in relation to body traits, feed intake, feeding behaviour and GHG emissions of Holstein bulls. Data were collected between May 2018 and July 2020 on 111 animals. Pearson correlations between studied traits were estimated on the residuals obtained from a linear mixed model which included the fixed effect of the linear covariate of age of bull on the dependent variable and the random effect of the bull. To assess the effect of RFI and FCR the same linear mixed model was implemented firstly by including the fixed effect of RFI (2 classes) and secondly the fixed effect of FCR (2 classes). Correlations between dry matter intake (DMI) and GHG ranged from 0.25 (CH4) to 0.36 (CO2). The strongest relationship was estimated between feed efficiency traits and DMI (0.86). RFI and FCR showed weak to moderate correlations with GHG (0.12–0.31). Animals belonging to the low classes of RFI and FCR had lower DMI and showed significant reduction of GHG emissions. Results of the present study highlighted significant differences in terms of feed efficiency and GHG emissions among tested animals; further research is needed on their progeny to investigate the genetic background of the same efficiency and emission-related traits. Highlights Feed efficiency and emission of greenhouse gases vary among Holstein bulls. Dry matter intake and feed efficiency traits were strongly positively associated. Animals endowed with greater feed efficiency had lower emissions and feed intake. Results of the present study will be useful to select animals for feed efficiency.

[1]  M. De Marchi,et al.  Repeatability and Reproducibility of Measures of Bovine Methane Emissions Recorded using a Laser Detector , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[2]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Review: Fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation. , 2020, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[3]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Accuracy of methane emissions predicted from milk mid-infrared spectra and measured by laser methane detectors in Brown Swiss dairy cows. , 2019, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  P. VanRaden,et al.  High-density genome-wide association study for residual feed intake in Holstein dairy cattle. , 2019, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Impact of longevity on greenhouse gas emissions and profitability of individual dairy cows analysed with different system boundaries. , 2019, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[6]  J. Mckinnon,et al.  Effect of fibrolytic enzymes on lactational performance, feeding behavior, and digestibility in high-producing dairy cows fed a barley silage-based diet. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  P. Lonergan,et al.  Plane of nutrition before and after 6 months of age in Holstein-Friesian bulls: II. Effects on metabolic and reproductive endocrinology and identification of physiological markers of puberty and sexual maturation. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  C. Staub,et al.  Plane of nutrition before and after 6 months of age in Holstein-Friesian bulls: I. Effects on performance, body composition, age at puberty, and postpubertal semen production. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  Alejandra M. González-Mejía,et al.  Climate mitigation by dairy intensification depends on intensive use of spared grassland , 2018, Global change biology.

[10]  Fadi Li,et al.  Association of residual feed intake with growth and slaughtering performance, blood metabolism, and body composition in growing lambs , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[11]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Enteric methane emissions from low- and high-residual feed intake beef heifers measured using GreenFeed and respiration chamber techniques. , 2017, Journal of animal science.

[12]  R. Maghirang,et al.  ENTERIC METHANE CONVERSION FACTOR FOR DAIRY AND BEEF CATTLE: EFFECTS OF FEED DIGESTIBILITY AND INTAKE LEVEL , 2017 .

[13]  T. Felix,et al.  Effects of timing and duration of test period and diet type on intake and feed efficiency of Charolais-sired cattle. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[14]  R. S. Zimmerman,et al.  The Use of an Automated System (GreenFeed) to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals , 2015, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[15]  E. Connor.  Invited review: improving feed efficiency in dairy production: challenges and possibilities. , 2015, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[16]  Shaoxun Tang,et al.  Responses of methane production and fermentation pathways to the increased dissolved hydrogen concentration generated by eight substrates in in vitro ruminal cultures , 2014 .

[17]  W P Weiss,et al.  Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  M. McGee,et al.  Methane emissions, body composition, and rumen fermentation traits of beef heifers differing in residual feed intake. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[19]  M. Mele,et al.  Genetic aspects of enteric methane emission in ruminants livestock , 2013 .

[20]  V. Baron,et al.  Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production , 2013, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[21]  B. Awda,et al.  The relationship between feed efficiency traits and fertility in young beef bulls , 2013, Canadian Journal of Animal Science.

[22]  D. Berry,et al.  Cell Biology Symposium: genetics of feed efficiency in dairy and beef cattle. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[23]  M. Mele,et al.  Genetic aspects of enteric methane emission in livestock ruminants , 2013 .

[24]  D. Shike.  Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency , 2013 .

[25]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Tackling climate change through livestock : a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities , 2013 .

[26]  W. M. Rauw.  Feed efficiency and animal robustness. , 2012 .

[27]  Rodney A. Hill,et al.  Feed efficiency in the beef industry. , 2012 .

[28]  M P L Calus,et al.  Genetic parameters for predicted methane production and potential for reducing enteric emissions through genomic selection. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[29]  M. McGee,et al.  Phenotypic and genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency in different breeds of Irish performance-tested beef bulls. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[30]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Dietary mitigation of enteric methane from cattle. , 2009 .

[31]  E. Bedel.  Relationship between , 2009 .

[32]  S. Moore,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic relationships of serum leptin concentration with performance, efficiency of gain, and carcass merit of feedlot cattle. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[33]  J. Goopy,et al.  Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[34]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Enteric methane emissions from growing beef cattle as affected by diet and level of intake , 2006 .

[35]  D. Berry,et al.  Holstein-Friesian strain and feed effects on milk production, body weight, and body condition score profiles in grazing dairy cows. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[36]  G. Griffith,et al.  The impact of breeding to reduce residual feed intake on enteric methane emissions from the Australian beef industry , 2006 .

[37]  P. Garnsworthy.  The environmental impact of fertility in dairy cows: a modelling approach to predict methane and ammonia emissions , 2004 .

[38]  Food Security.  Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) , 2004 .

[39]  J. Mee,et al.  Relationships among milk yield, body condition, cow weight, and reproduction in spring-calved Holstein-Friesians. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[40]  John A. Basarab,et al.  Residual feed intake and body composition in young growing cattle , 2003 .

[41]  J. Archer,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[42]  J. Archer,et al.  Duration of performance tests for growth rate, feed intake and feed efficiency in four biological types of beef cattle , 2000 .

[43]  D. Johnson,et al.  Methane emissions from cattle. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[44]  J. Arendonk,et al.  Genetic relationships between feed intake, efficiency and production traits in growing bulls, growing heifers and lactating heifers. , 1992 .

[45]  J.A.M. van Arendonk,et al.  Genetic aspects of feed intake and efficiency in lactating dairy heifers , 1991 .

[46]  L. D. Vanvleck,et al.  Parameters of Growth of Holstein-Friesian Bulls , 1973 .