The use of analytic hierarchy process for the prioritization of factors affecting wellbeing in elderly

The definition of well-being is complex and well-being may be affected by a wide variety of factors. Among older people well-being is even more complex, because it may vary depending on different individuals’ backgrounds and experiences. Nonetheless, it is important to understand what the concept of well-being means to older people and which factors affect well-being, because of the growing importance of cost-utility studies in medicine and health services research. Such studies aim to measure the quality of life in participants before and after a medical/surgical intervention. However, the scales used to measure quality of life are based on expert opinion, and could be improved by being more focused on what the concept of well-being means to older people themselves. In this study, based on scientific literature, we defined a hierarchy of 45 factors, organized into 15 subcategories, which were grouped into 5 main categories. A questionnaire was submitted to 23 older people who participated in a focus group on well-being. Based on their responses, we used the Analytic  Corresponding author Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process 2011 2 Hierarchy Process to develop a hierarchy of factors that contribute to well-being in later life. Our experience leaded us to believe that AHP could contribute to qualitative research, assessing the priority of factors influencing the wellbeing in older people.

[1]  Thomas L. Saaty An Essay on How Judgment and Measurement are Different in Science and in Decision Making , 2009 .

[2]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[3]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[4]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  A. Maslow A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[6]  Peter A. Bath,et al.  AHP and risk management : a case study for assessing risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older patients , 2009 .

[7]  James G. Dolant Can decision analysis adequately represent clinical problems , 1990 .

[8]  James G. Dolan,et al.  Involving patients in complex decisions about their care , 1993, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[9]  Jae Kyeong Kim,et al.  A utility range-based interactive group support system for multiattribute decision making , 2001, Comput. Oper. Res..

[10]  M. Jamshidi,et al.  Determining flexor-tendon repair techniques via soft computing , 2001, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[11]  Michael Steinberg,et al.  Decision counseling for men considering prostate cancer screening , 2003, Comput. Oper. Res..

[12]  C. Fargason,et al.  Preferences of pregnant women and physicians for 2 strategies for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis in neonates. , 1997, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[13]  James G. Dolan,et al.  Involving patients in decisions regarding preventive health interventions using the analytic hierarchy process , 2000, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[14]  Mark Leys,et al.  Health care policy: qualitative evidence and health technology assessment. , 2003, Health policy.

[15]  R. Ramanathan,et al.  Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages , 1994 .