Roles in construction projects: analysis and terminology

Standard form contracts are typically developed through a negotiated consensus, unless they are proffered by one specific interest group. Previously published plans of work and other descriptions of the processes in construction projects tend to focus on operational issues, or they tend to be prepared from the point of view of one or other of the dominant interest groups. Legal practice in the UK permits those who draft contracts to define their terms as they choose. There are no definitive rulings from the courts that give an indication as to the detailed responsibilities of project participants. The science of terminology offers useful guidance for discovering and describing terms and their meanings in their practical context, but has never been used for defining terms for responsibilities of participants in the construction project management process. Organizational analysis enables the management task to be deconstructed into its elemental parts in order that effective organizational structures can be developed. Organizational mapping offers a useful technique for reducing text-based descriptions of project management roles and responsibilities to a comparable basis. Research was carried out by means of a desk study, detailed analysis of nine plans of work and focus groups representing all aspects of the construction industry. No published plan of work offers definitive guidance. There is an enormous amount of variety in the way that terms are used for identifying responsibilities of project participants. A catalogue of concepts and terms (a “Terminology”) has been compiled and indexed to enable those who draft contracts to choose the most appropriate titles for project participants. The purpose of this terminology is to enable the selection and justification of appropriate terms in order to help define roles. The terminology brings an unprecedented clarity to the description of roles and responsibilities in construction projects and, as such, will be helpful for anyone seeking to assemble a team and specify roles for project participants.

[1]  Will Hughes.  Organizational analysis of building projects , 1989 .

[2]  James E. Rosenzweig,et al.  Organization and management : a systems and contingency approach , 1979 .

[3]  Clive H. Elphick,et al.  Brain of the Firm , 1981 .

[4]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Developing a subject-derived terminology to describe perceptions of chemicals in foods. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Albert B. Cherns,et al.  Studying the client's role in construction management , 1984 .

[6]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[7]  Ghassan Aouad,et al.  Rethinking construction: the Generic Design and Construction Process Protocol , 2000 .

[8]  S. Bickford-Smith,et al.  Emden's construction law , 1980 .

[9]  Ö. Akin.  Psychology of architectural design , 1986 .

[10]  Sophia Ananiadou,et al.  Terms are not alone: term choice and choice terms , 1995, TC.

[11]  Ghassan Aouad,et al.  A Generic Guide to the Design and Construction: Process Protocol , 1998 .

[12]  R. Peierls.  The case for the defence , 1987, Nature.

[13]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[14]  Rachel Burnett,et al.  Drafting and negotiating computer contracts , 1993 .

[15]  Jan Bröchner,et al.  Precontractual investigation and risk aversion , 1994 .

[16]  Subrata Dasgupta,et al.  The Structure of Design Processes , 1989, Adv. Comput..

[17]  Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al.  Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process , 1996 .

[18]  van Houten,et al.  Design & Process Planning , 1997 .

[19]  C. Hardy.  Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems , 1983 .

[20]  Yoram Reich,et al.  Varieties and issues of participation and design , 1996 .

[21]  A. Walker.  A model for the design of project management structures for building clients. , 1980 .

[22]  T. O. Jeffries,et al.  Systems Analysis and Project Management , 1969 .

[23]  J. William Helton,et al.  An introduction to design , 1998 .

[24]  Steve Scott,et al.  A survey of the site records kept by construction supervisors , 1999 .

[25]  Donald Keating,et al.  Keating on Building Contracts , 1991 .

[26]  Helmi B. Sonneveld,et al.  Terminology : applications in interdisciplinary communication , 1993 .

[27]  David R. Shoesmith.  A study of the management and procurement of building services work , 1996 .

[28]  Fred W. Riggs.  Onomantics and Terminology. Pt. 1: Their contributions to Knowledge Organization , 1996 .

[29]  Mike Bresnen,et al.  Construction industry clients: A survey of their attributes and project management practices , 1991 .

[30]  T. W. Maver,et al.  Appraisal in the Building Design Process , 1970 .

[31]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[32]  R. R. K. Hartmann,et al.  Lexicography : principles and practice , 1983 .

[33]  J J Cimino,et al.  Mapping clinically useful terminology to a controlled medical vocabulary. , 1994, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[34]  Andrew John Newton,et al.  The planning and management of detailed building design , 1995 .

[35]  A. C. Sidwell,et al.  Project management: Dynamics and performance , 1990 .