Smart mask ship to control for enhanced on wafer CD performance

In the process of semicondutcor fabrication the translation of the final product requirements into specific targets for each component of the manufacturing process is one of the most demanding tasks. This involves the careful assessment of the error budgets of each component as well as the sensible balancing of the costs implied by the requirements. Photolithographic masks play a pivotal role in the semiconductor fabrication. This attributes a crucial role to mask error budgeting within the overall wafer production process. Masks with borderline performance with respect to the wafer fabrication requirements have a detrimental effect on the wafer process window thus inducing delays and costs. However, prohibitively strict mask specifications will induce large costs and delays in the mask manufacturing process. Thus setting smart control mechanisms for mask quality assessment is highly relevant for an efficient production flow. To this end GLOBALFOUNDRIES and the AMTC have set up a new mask specification check to enable a smart ship to control process for mask manufacturing. Within this process the mask CD distribution is checked as to whether it is commensurable with the advanced dose control capabilities of the stepper in the wafer factory. If this is the case, masks with borderline CD performance will be usable within the manufacturing process as the signatures can be compensated. In this paper we give a detailed explanation of the smart ship control approach with its implications for mask quality.

[1]  Peter Vanoppen,et al.  CD uniformity improvement by active scanner corrections , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Wolfram Koestler,et al.  CD control: Whose turn is it? , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Erez Graitzer,et al.  Correcting image placement errors using registration control (RegC) technology , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Munsik Kim,et al.  The study to enhance the mask global CD uniformity by removing local CD variation , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Shuichi Tamamushi,et al.  CD inspection by Nuflare NPI 6000 tool , 2010, Photomask Technology.

[6]  Brid Connolly,et al.  Mask characterization for double patterning lithography , 2009 .

[7]  Martin Sczyrba,et al.  Tales of scales: how to enable backup process tool qualification for high-end photomasks , 2012, Other Conferences.

[8]  Martin Sczyrba,et al.  Performance comparison of techniques for intra-field CD control improvement , 2007, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[9]  Rolf Seltmann,et al.  CD control with defect inspection: you can teach an old dog a new trick , 2012, Photomask Technology.

[10]  Franz Aurenhammer,et al.  Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure , 1991, CSUR.

[11]  Martin Rößiger,et al.  Determination of spatial CD signatures on photomasks , 2006, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[12]  Andrew B. Kahng,et al.  Dose map and placement co-optimization for timing yield enhancement and leakage power reduction , 2008, 2008 45th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference.

[13]  Paolo Canestrari,et al.  CD-uniformity for 45nm NV memory on product-stack , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .