A Multilevel Investigation of the Influences of Employees' Resistance to Empowerment

We employed a multilevel research design to examine the effects of employees' resistance to empowerment. Survey responses were obtained from 637 customer service engineers who worked in 121 empowered teams. At the team level of analysis, resistance to empowerment climate related negatively to customer satisfaction as mediated by transition processes. In addition, resistance to empowerment climate evidenced an indirect relation with team performance via team action processes. At the individual level of analysis, employees' resistance to empowerment related negatively to their job satisfaction. Moreover, a cross-level relation was evidenced whereby team-level resistance to empowerment climate related negatively to job satisfaction, beyond that accounted for by the individual-level effects, as partially mediated by team interpersonal processes. Results are discussed in terms of the multilevel manner in which employees' resistance to empowerment can undermine organizational design changes.

[1]  Yuk Fai Cheong,et al.  HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling , 2000 .

[2]  A. Beauducel,et al.  Simulation study on fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) based on data with slightly distorted simple structure , 2005 .

[3]  M. Browne,et al.  Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures. , 1989, Multivariate behavioral research.

[4]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. , 2000 .

[5]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A cross-level examination of group absence influences on individual absence. , 1990 .

[6]  B. Schneider,et al.  Which comes first: employee attitudes or organizational financial and market performance? , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  M. DiVincenti,et al.  Strategies for Planned Change , 1978 .

[8]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Members’ Cultural Values on Productivity, Cooperation, and Empowerment in Self-Managing Work Teams , 2001 .

[9]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work , 1995 .

[10]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Business Without Bosses: How Self-Managing Teams Are Building High- Performing Companies , 1993 .

[11]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in Organizations , 1998 .

[12]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[13]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Cultural Values on Employee Resistance to Teams: Toward A Model of Globalized Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness , 1997 .

[14]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[15]  D. Chan.  Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[16]  Glenn Firebaugh,et al.  A Rule for Inferring Individual-Level Relationships from Aggregate Data , 1978 .

[17]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Outcomes of Autonomous Workgroups: A Long-Term Field Experiment , 1986 .

[18]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[19]  J. Mathieu,et al.  A framework for testing meso‐mediational relationships in Organizational Behavior , 2007 .

[20]  D. Hofmann.  An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models , 1997 .

[21]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  H. Marsh,et al.  In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings , 2004 .

[23]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Empowerment and team effectiveness: an empirical test of an integrated model. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  I G Kreft,et al.  The Effect of Different Forms of Centering in Hierarchical Linear Models. , 1995, Multivariate behavioral research.

[25]  Jeanne M. Brett,et al.  Employee concerns regarding self-managing work teams: A multidimensional justice perspective , 1996 .

[26]  R. Wageman.  Critical success factors for creating superb self-managing teams , 1997 .

[27]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[29]  P. Osterman.  How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts it? , 1994 .

[30]  P. Strebel.  Why do employees resist change? , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[31]  B. Morris.  The Service Profit Chain: : How Leading Companies Link Profit and Growth to Loyalty, Satisfaction, and Value , 1998 .

[32]  L. James,et al.  Mediators, Moderators, and Tests for Mediation. , 1984 .

[33]  L. James,et al.  rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. , 1993 .

[34]  André Beauducel,et al.  Simulation Study on Fit Indexes in CFA Based on Data With Slightly Distorted Simple Structure , 2005 .

[35]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. , 1990 .

[36]  John Cordery,et al.  Attitudinal and Behavioral Effects of Autonomous Group Working: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1991 .

[37]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Multilevel Modeling of Individual and Group Level Mediated Effects , 2001, Multivariate behavioral research.

[38]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF PROPORTIONAL AND PERCEPTUAL CONFLICT COMPOSITION ON TEAM PERFORMANCE , 2000 .

[39]  M. Marks,et al.  The Influence of Team Monitoring on Team Processes and Performance , 2004 .

[40]  Charlotte R. Gerstner.  Leadership relationships and work group effectiveness: A multi-level empirical examination. , 1998 .

[41]  Jonathan A. Rhoades,et al.  The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors , 2000 .

[42]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[43]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. , 2001 .

[44]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[45]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  EFFECTS OF SELF‐EFFICACY and GOAL‐ORIENTATION TRAINING ON NEGOTIATION SKILL MAINTENANCE: WHAT ARE THE MECHANISMS? , 1997 .

[46]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  James K. Harter,et al.  Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[49]  T. Ruddy,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND PERFORMANCE: ONCE MORE INTO THE BREECH , 1997 .

[50]  Seokhwa Yun,et al.  The Effects of Proximal and Distal Goalson Goal Level, Strategy Development, and Group Performance , 2000 .

[51]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  The Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams: A Quasi-Experiment , 1994 .

[52]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[53]  Shaul Oreg,et al.  Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  Xitao Fan,et al.  Sensitivity of Fit Indexes to Misspecified Structural or Measurement Model Components: Rationale of Two-Index Strategy Revisited , 2005 .

[55]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment , 1999 .

[56]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[57]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[58]  C. Pearson.  Autonomous Workgroups: An Evaluation at an Industrial Site , 1992 .

[59]  N. Tichy.  Managing strategic change: Technical, political, and cultural dynamics , 1985 .

[60]  N. Anderson,et al.  Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory , 1998 .

[61]  L. McKay.  Overcoming resistance to change. , 1993, Canadian journal of nursing administration.

[62]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[63]  Nitin Nohria,et al.  Fast Forward: The Best Ideas on Managing Business Change , 1996 .

[64]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  An examination of the effects of organizational district and team contexts on team processes and performance: a meso-mediational model , 2007 .

[65]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[66]  E. Ramsden.  Group Process and Productivity , 1973 .

[67]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  WHY DO EMPLOYEES RESIST TEAMS? EXAMINING THE "RESISTANCE BARRIER" TO WORK TEAM EFFECTIVENESS , 2000 .

[68]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .