BIODIVERSITY, INVASION RESISTANCE, AND MARINE ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION: RECONCILING PATTERN AND PROCESS

A venerable generalization about community resistance to invasions is that more diverse communities are more resistant to invasion. However, results of experimental and observational studies often conflict, leading to vigorous debate about the mechanistic importance of diversity in determining invasion success in the field, as well as other eco- system properties, such as productivity and stability. In this study, we employed both field experiments and observational approaches to assess the effects of diversity on the invasion of a subtidal marine invertebrate community by three species of nonindigenous ascidians (sea squirts). In experimentally assembled communities, decreasing native diversity in- creased the survival and final percent cover of invaders, whereas the abundance of individual species had no effect on these measures of invasion success. Increasing native diversity also decreased the availability of open space, the limiting resource in this system, by buffering against fluctuations in the cover of individual species. This occurred because temporal patterns of abundance differed among species, so space was most consistently and completely occupied when more species were present. When we held diversity constant, but manipulated resource availability, we found that the settlement and recruitment of new invaders dramatically increased with increasing availability of open space. This suggests that the effect of diversity on invasion success is largely due to its effects on resource (space) availability. Apart from invasion resistance, the increased temporal stability found in more diverse communities may itself be considered an enhancement of ecosystem func- tion. In field surveys, we found a strong negative correlation between native-species richness and the number and frequency of nonnative invaders at the scale of both a single quadrat (25 3 25 cm), and an entire site (50 3 50 m). Such a pattern suggests that the means by which diversity affects invasion resistance in our experiments is important in determining the distribution of invasive species in the field. Further synthesis of mechanistic and ob- servational approaches should be encouraged, as this will increase our understanding of the conditions under which diversity does (and does not) play an important role in deter- mining the distribution of invaders in the field.

[1]  K. Woods.  Effects of Invasion by Lonicera tatarica L. On Herbs and Tree Seedlings in Four New England Forests , 1993 .

[2]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  Community Interactions on Marine Rocky Intertidal Shores , 1972 .

[3]  M. Usher,et al.  Biological invasions of nature reserves: A search for generalisations , 1988 .

[4]  R. Karlson,et al.  Development and Stability of the Fouling Community at Beaufort, North Carolina , 1977 .

[5]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[6]  Janet K. Thompson,et al.  Remarkable invasion of San Francisco Bay (California, USA), by the Asian clam Potamocorbula amurensis. II, Displacement of a former community , 1990 .

[7]  C. Elton.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants , 1960, Springer US.

[8]  T. Case.  Global patterns in the establishment and distribution of exotic birds , 1996 .

[9]  Jason D. Hoeksema,et al.  Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology , 2000, Oecologia.

[10]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Rare Species Loss Alters Ecosystem Function – Invasion Resistance , 2001 .

[11]  R. Osman,et al.  Potential role of micropredators in determining recruitment into a marine community , 1992 .

[12]  E. James,et al.  Zoology of New York, or the New-York fauna : , 1842 .

[13]  J. Quinn,et al.  Invasibility of experimental habitat Islands in a California winter annual grassland , 1995 .

[14]  Sarah H. Reichard,et al.  Predicting Invasions of Woody Plants Introduced into North America , 1997, Conservation Biology.

[15]  Edwin D. Grosholz,et al.  THE IMPACTS OF A NONINDIGENOUS MARINE PREDATOR IN A CALIFORNIA BAY , 2000 .

[16]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change , 1992 .

[17]  M. M. Pamatmat,et al.  The ecology of the soft-bottom benthos of San Francisco Bay: a community profile , 1988 .

[18]  Van Name,et al.  The North and South American ascidians , 1945 .

[19]  R. Grosberg.  LIFE‐HISTORY VARIATION WITHIN A POPULATION OF THE COLONIAL ASCIDIAN BOTRYLLUS SCHLOSSERI. I. THE GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OF SEASONAL VARIATION , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  D. Richardson,et al.  What attributes make some plant species more invasive , 1996 .

[21]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Invasibility and diversity of plant communities:from patterns to processes , 1999 .

[22]  J. Travis.  Invader threatens black, azov seas. , 1993, Science.

[23]  Van Name,et al.  The North and South American ascidians. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 84 , 1945 .

[24]  A. Symstad.  A test of the effects of functional group richness and composition on grassland invasibility. , 2000 .

[25]  S. Worcester.  Adult rafting versus larval swimming: dispersal and recruitment of a botryllid ascidian on eelgrass , 1994 .

[26]  W. D. Valentine,et al.  The concepts of elasticity, invulnerability and invadability. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  G. Vermeij.  When Biotas Meet: Understanding Biotic Interchange , 1991, Science.

[28]  J. Sutherland.  FUNCTIONAL ROLES OF SCHIZOPORELLA AND STYELA IN THE FOULING COMMUNITY AT BEAUFORT, NORTH CAROLINA' , 1978 .

[29]  James T. Carlton,et al.  Pattern, process, and prediction in marine invasion ecology , 1996 .

[30]  R. Osman,et al.  Processes affecting newly-settled juveniles and the consequences to subsequent community development , 1996 .

[31]  Richard Law,et al.  PERMANENCE AND THE ASSEMBLY OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 1996 .

[32]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments , 1998 .

[33]  L. Buss,et al.  Competitive Networks: Nontransitive Competitive Relationships in Cryptic Coral Reef Environments , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[34]  T. Conomos.  San Francisco Bay - the urbanized estuary , 1982 .

[35]  P. Sale.  Maintenance of High Diversity in Coral Reef Fish Communities , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[36]  P. Reich,et al.  Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. , 1999, Ecology letters.

[37]  E. Aschehoug,et al.  Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. , 2000, Science.

[38]  K. Sebens.  Spatial Relationships among Encrusting Marine Organisms in the New England Subtidal Zone , 1986 .

[39]  Martin Solan,et al.  Consistent patterns and the idiosyncratic effects of biodiversity in marine ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[40]  C. Peterson.  Predation, Competitive Exclusion, and Diversity in the Soft-Sediment Benthic Communities of Estuaries and Lagoons , 1979 .

[41]  B. Schmid,et al.  ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY: A CLASSIFICATION OF HYPOTHESES AND EXPLORATION OF EMPIRICAL RESULTS , 1999 .

[42]  R. Osman.  The Influence of Seasonality and Stability on the Species Equilibrium , 1978 .

[43]  D. Wilcove,et al.  QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[44]  R. Whittaker.  Communities and Ecosystems , 1975 .

[45]  R. Grosberg.  Competitive ability influences habitat choice in marine invertebrates , 1981, Nature.

[46]  J. Connell.  Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[47]  E. A. Smith..  MOLLUSCA , 1890, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[48]  M. Rejmánek.  Species Richness and Resistance to Invasions , 1996 .

[49]  R. Naiman,et al.  Invasibility of species-rich communities in riparian zones , 1996 .

[50]  R. Paine.  Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[51]  J. R. Griffin,et al.  Introduced and native plants of the hastings reservation, central coastal California : a comparison , 1995 .

[52]  W. M. Lonsdale,et al.  GLOBAL PATTERNS OF PLANT INVASIONS AND THE CONCEPT OF INVASIBILITY , 1999 .

[53]  P. Dayton.  Competition, Disturbance, and Community Organization: The Provision and Subsequent Utilization of Space in a Rocky Intertidal Community , 1971 .

[54]  J. Emmett Duffy,et al.  GRAZER DIVERSITY, FUNCTIONAL REDUNDANCY, AND PRODUCTIVITY IN SEAGRASS BEDS: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST , 2001 .

[55]  J. Morgan.  Patterns of invasion of an urban remnant of a species-rich grassland in southeastern Australia by non-native plant species , 1998 .

[56]  L. Harris,et al.  Recent invasions of the Gulf of Maine : three contrasting ecological histories , 1992 .

[57]  J. Levine.  Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. , 2000, Science.

[58]  Thomas J. Stohlgren,et al.  EXOTIC PLANT SPECIES INVADE HOT SPOTS OF NATIVE PLANT DIVERSITY , 1999 .

[59]  R. Osman.  The Establishment and Development of a Marine Epifaunal Community , 1977 .

[60]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  David Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors , 2000 .

[62]  W. Post,et al.  Community assembly and food web stability , 1983 .

[63]  R. Osman,et al.  The influence of resident adults on recruitment: a comparison to settlement , 1995 .

[64]  J. E. Byers.  COMPETITION BETWEEN TWO ESTUARINE SNAILS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INVASIONS OF EXOTIC SPECIES , 2000 .

[65]  Cohen,et al.  Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary , 1998, Science.

[66]  P. Kareiva.  Developing a Predictive Ecology for Non‐Indigenous Species and Ecological Invasions , 1996 .

[67]  R. Osman,et al.  Predation on early ontogenetic life stages and its effect on recruitment into a marine epifaunal community , 1995 .

[68]  G. Russ.  Overgrowth in a marine epifaumal community: Competitive hierarchies and competitive networks , 1982, Oecologia.

[69]  James A. Drake,et al.  The mechanics of community assembly and succession , 1990 .

[70]  Osman,et al.  Species Diversity and Invasion Resistance in a Marine Ecosystem. , 1999, Science.

[71]  James C. Schardt,et al.  Uptake and allocation of 15N in alpine plants: implications for the importance of competitive ability in predicting community structure in a stressful environment , 1996 .

[72]  Susan K. Wiser,et al.  COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND FOREST INVASION BY AN EXOTIC HERB OVER 23 YEARS , 1998 .

[73]  Jill McGrady-Steed,et al.  Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability , 1997, Nature.

[74]  J. P. Grime,et al.  An Experimental Study of Plant Community Invasibility , 1996 .

[75]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances , 2000 .

[76]  R. Osman,et al.  The influence of resident adults on larval settlement: experiments with four species of ascidians , 1995 .

[77]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity , 1997, Oecologia.

[78]  T. Case,et al.  Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communities. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[79]  Charles C. Elton,et al.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. , 1959 .

[80]  Jonathan M. Levine,et al.  Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility , 1999 .

[81]  J. Jackson.  Competition on Marine Hard Substrata: The Adaptive Significance of Solitary and Colonial Strategies , 1977, The American Naturalist.