A Subjective and Objective Study of Space-Time Subsampled Video Quality

Video dimensions are continuously increasing to provide more realistic and immersive experiences to global streaming and social media viewers. However, increments in video parameters such as spatial resolution and frame rate are inevitably associated with larger data volumes. Transmitting increasingly voluminous videos through limited bandwidth networks in a perceptually optimal way is a current challenge affecting billions of viewers. One recent practice adopted by video service providers is space-time resolution adaptation in conjunction with video compression. Consequently, it is important to understand how different levels of space-time subsampling and compression affect the perceptual quality of videos. Towards making progress in this direction, we constructed a large new resource, called the ETRI-LIVE Space-Time Subsampled Video Quality (ETRI-LIVE STSVQ) database, containing 437 videos generated by applying various levels of combined space-time subsampling and video compression on 15 diverse video contents. We also conducted a large-scale human study on the new dataset, collecting about 15,000 subjective judgments of video quality. We provide a rate-distortion analysis of the collected subjective scores, enabling us to investigate the perceptual impact of space-time subsampling at different bit rates. We also evaluated and compare the performance of leading video quality models on the new database. The new ETRI-LIVE STSVQ database is being made freely available at (https://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/ETRI-LIVE_STSVQ/index.html).

[1]  Praful Gupta,et al.  SpEED-QA: Spatial Efficient Entropic Differencing for Image and Video Quality , 2017, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[2]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Spatiotemporal Feature Integration and Model Fusion for Full Reference Video Quality Assessment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[3]  Alexander Raake,et al.  AVT-VQDB-UHD-1: A Large Scale Video Quality Database for UHD-1 , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM).

[4]  Yasutaka Matsuo,et al.  Frame-rate conversion method by linear-filtering interpolation using spatio-temporal contrast compensation , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE).

[5]  Yue Chen,et al.  An Overview of Core Coding Tools in the AV1 Video Codec , 2018, 2018 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS).

[6]  Itu-R Parameter Values for an Expanded Hierarchy of LSDI Image Formats for Production and International Programme Exchange , 2006 .

[7]  Chang-Su Kim,et al.  Motion-Compensated Frame Interpolation Using Bilateral Motion Estimation and Adaptive Overlapped Block Motion Compensation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[8]  Angeliki V. Katsenou,et al.  Perceptually-Aligned Frame Rate Selection Using Spatio-Temporal Features , 2018, 2018 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS).

[9]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[10]  A. Bovik,et al.  Video Quality Model for Space-Time Resolution Adaptation , 2020, 2020 IEEE 4th International Conference on Image Processing, Applications and Systems (IPAS).

[11]  Ajay Luthra,et al.  Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[12]  Debargha Mukherjee,et al.  A Technical Overview of VP9—The Latest Open-Source Video Codec , 2013 .

[13]  Marcus Barkowsky,et al.  Comparing upscaling algorithms from HD to Ultra HD by evaluating preference of experience , 2014, 2014 Sixth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[14]  Qin Huang,et al.  Perceptual Quality Driven Frame-Rate Selection (PQD-FRS) for High-Frame-Rate Video , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[15]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[16]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Jong-Seok Lee,et al.  Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Compressed 4K UHD Videos for Immersive Experience , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[18]  Mariana Afonso,et al.  A Study of Subjective Video Quality at Various Spatial Resolutions , 2018, 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[19]  Sangwook Lee,et al.  Comparison of subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications , 2007 .

[20]  Jari Korhonen,et al.  Two-Level Approach for No-Reference Consumer Video Quality Assessment , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  High Frame Rates and Human Vision: A View through the Window of Visibility , 2013 .

[22]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Video Quality Assessment by Reduced Reference Spatio-Temporal Entropic Differencing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[24]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication , 2008 .

[25]  Jean-Bernard Martens,et al.  Quality asessment of coded images using numerical category scaling , 1995, Other Conferences.

[26]  Sabine Süsstrunk,et al.  Measuring colorfulness in natural images , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[27]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[28]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Making a “Completely Blind” Image Quality Analyzer , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[29]  Marko Viitanen,et al.  UVG dataset: 50/120fps 4K sequences for video codec analysis and development , 2020, MMSys.

[30]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  Analysis of Public Image and Video Databases for Quality Assessment , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[31]  Gary J. Sullivan,et al.  Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[32]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[33]  Mariana Afonso,et al.  Video Compression Based on Spatio-Temporal Resolution Adaptation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[34]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[35]  C.-C. Jay Kuo,et al.  MCL-V: A streaming video quality assessment database , 2015, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..