The peroxisomal membrane protein Pex13p shows a novel mode of SH3 interaction

Src homology 3 (SH3) domains are small non‐catalytic protein modules capable of mediating protein–protein interactions by binding to proline‐X‐X‐proline (P‐X‐X‐P) motifs. Here we demonstrate that the SH3 domain of the integral peroxisomal membrane protein Pex13p is able to bind two proteins, one of which, Pex5p, represents a novel non‐P‐X‐X‐P ligand. Using alanine scanning, two‐hybrid and in vitro interaction analysis, we show that an α‐helical element in Pex5p is necessary and sufficient for SH3 interaction. Sup pressor analysis using Pex5p mutants located in this α‐helical element allowed the identification of a unique site of interaction for Pex5p on the Pex13p‐SH3 domain that is distinct from the classical P‐X‐X‐P binding pocket. On the basis of a structural model of the Pex13p‐SH3 domain we show that this interaction probably takes place between the RT‐ and distal loops. Thus, the Pex13p‐SH3–Pex5p interaction establishes a novel mode of SH3 interaction.

[1]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[2]  H. Tabak,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae PTS1 receptor Pex5p interacts with the SH3 domain of the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex13p in an unconventional, non-PXXP-related manner. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[3]  G. Wagner,et al.  SH3 domain recognition of a proline‐independent tyrosine‐based RKxxYxxY motif in immune cell adaptor SKAP55 , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[4]  D. Crane,et al.  Interaction of Pex5p, the Type 1 Peroxisome Targeting Signal Receptor, with the Peroxisomal Membrane Proteins Pex14p and Pex13p* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  G. Blatch,et al.  The tetratricopeptide repeat: a structural motif mediating protein-protein interactions. , 1999, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[6]  H. Moser Genotype-phenotype correlations in disorders of peroxisome biogenesis. , 1999, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[7]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  A novel peptide–SH3 interaction , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[8]  M C Peitsch,et al.  Protein modelling for all. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[9]  D. Barford,et al.  Topological characteristics of helical repeat proteins. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[10]  W. Gmeiner,et al.  Comparison of SH3 and SH2 domain dynamics when expressed alone or in an SH(3+2) construct: the role of protein dynamics in functional regulation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  P. Rehling,et al.  Involvement of Pex13p in Pex14p Localization and Peroxisomal Targeting Signal 2–dependent Protein Import into Peroxisomes , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  B. Agianian,et al.  Recombinant Human Peroxisomal Targeting Signal Receptor PEX5 , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  D Baker,et al.  Prediction and structural characterization of an independently folding substructure in the src SH3 domain. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  S. Arold,et al.  RT loop flexibility enhances the specificity of Src family SH3 domains for HIV-1 Nef. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[15]  S. Subramani,et al.  Identification of a human PTS1 receptor docking protein directly required for peroxisomal protein import. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  I D Campbell,et al.  The folding kinetics and thermodynamics of the Fyn-SH3 domain. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[17]  T. Pawson,et al.  Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adaptor proteins. , 1997, Science.

[18]  B. Kay,et al.  Examining the specificity of Src homology 3 domain--ligand interactions with alkaline phosphatase fusion proteins. , 1997, Analytical biochemistry.

[19]  P. Rehling,et al.  Pex14p, a Peroxisomal Membrane Protein Binding Both Receptors of the Two PTS-Dependent Import Pathways , 1997, Cell.

[20]  S. Gould,et al.  Multiple PEX genes are required for proper subcellular distribution and stability of Pex5p, the PTS1 receptor: evidence that PTS1 protein import is mediated by a cycling receptor , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  Serge Vaudenay,et al.  Minding your p's and q's , 1996, ASIACRYPT.

[22]  D. Crane,et al.  Pex13p is an SH3 protein of the peroxisome membrane and a docking factor for the predominantly cytoplasmic PTs1 receptor , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  G. Blobel,et al.  Identification of Pex13p a peroxisomal membrane receptor for the PTS1 recognition factor , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  H. Tabak,et al.  The SH3 domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae peroxisomal membrane protein Pex13p functions as a docking site for Pex5p, a mobile receptor for the import PTS1-containing proteins , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  B. Chait,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Conserved Core of HIV-1 Nef Complexed with a Src Family SH3 Domain , 1996, Cell.

[26]  Malmqvist,et al.  Epitope Mapping by Label-Free Biomolecular Interaction Analysis , 1996, Methods.

[27]  J. Goodman,et al.  The targeting and assembly of peroxisomal proteins: some old rules do not apply. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[28]  B Rost,et al.  Progress of 1D protein structure prediction at last , 1995, Proteins.

[29]  D. Cowburn,et al.  A single amino acid in the SH3 domain of Hck determines its high affinity and specificity in binding to HIV‐1 Nef protein. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[30]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Structure-function analysis of SH3 domains: SH3 binding specificity altered by single amino acid substitutions , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[31]  S. Subramani,et al.  The Pichia pastoris peroxisomal protein PAS8p is the receptor for the C‐terminal tripeptide peroxisomal targeting signal. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[32]  B. Mayer,et al.  SH3 Domains: Minding your p's and q's , 1995, Current Biology.

[33]  C. Brees,et al.  Identification and Characterization of the Putative Human Peroxisomal C-terminal Targeting Signal Import Receptor (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Structural determinants of peptide-binding orientation and of sequence specificity in SH3 domains , 1995, Nature.

[35]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Two binding orientations for peptides to the Src SH3 domain: development of a general model for SH3-ligand interactions. , 1995, Science.

[36]  H. Moser,et al.  Mutations in the PTS1 receptor gene, PXR1, define complementation group 2 of the peroxisome biogenesis disorders , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[37]  A. Sali,et al.  Structural basis for the specific interaction of lysine-containing proline-rich peptides with the N-terminal SH3 domain of c-Crk. , 1995, Structure.

[38]  R. Rickles,et al.  Identification of Src, Fyn, Lyn, PI3K and Abl SH3 domain ligands using phage display libraries. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[39]  F. Kragler,et al.  The tetratricopeptide repeat-domain of the PAS10 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is essential for binding the peroxisomal targeting signal-SKL. , 1994, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[40]  A. Sparks,et al.  Identification and characterization of Src SH3 ligands from phage-displayed random peptide libraries. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[41]  M. Jaye,et al.  Identification of a Src SH3 domain binding motif by screening a random phage display library. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[42]  F. Richards,et al.  Critical residues in an SH3 domain from Sem-5 suggest a mechanism for proline-rich peptide recognition , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[43]  H. Tabak,et al.  PAS10 is a tetratricopeptide-repeat protein that is essential for the import of most matrix proteins into peroxisomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  H. Ploegh,et al.  The WD‐40 repeat , 1992, FEBS letters.

[45]  S. Fields,et al.  A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions , 1989, Nature.

[46]  Tirso Pons,et al.  Homology modeling, model and software evaluation: three related resources , 1998, Bioinform..

[47]  D Cowburn,et al.  Modular peptide recognition domains in eukaryotic signaling. , 1997, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[48]  B. Rost PHD: predicting one-dimensional protein structure by profile-based neural networks. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[49]  Y. Fujiki,et al.  Biogenesis of peroxisomes. , 1985, Annual review of cell biology.