Classification of Airborne Multispectral Lidar Point Clouds for Land Cover Mapping

Airborne light detection and ranging (lidar) data are widely used for high-resolution land cover mapping. The lidar elevation data are typically used as complementary information to passive multispectral or hyperspectral imagery to enable higher land cover classification accuracy. In this paper, we examine the capabilities of a recently developed multispectral airborne laser scanner, manufactured by Teledyne Optech, for direct classification of multispectral point clouds into ten land cover classes including grass, trees, two classes of soil, four classes of pavement, and two classes of buildings. The scanner, Titan MW, collects point clouds at three different laser wavelengths simultaneously, opening the door to new possibilities in land cover classification using only lidar data. We show that the recorded intensities of laser returns together with spatial metrics calculated from the three-dimensional (3D) locations of laser returns are sufficient for classifying the point cloud into ten distinct land cover classes. Our classification methods achieved an overall accuracy of 94.7% with a kappa coefficient of 0.94 using the support vector machine (SVM) method to classify single-return points and an overall accuracy of 79.7% and kappa coefficient of 0.77 using a rule-based classifier on multireturn points. A land cover map is then generated from the classified point cloud. We show that our results outperform the common approach of rasterizing the point cloud prior to classification by ∼4% in overall accuracy, 0.04 in kappa coefficient, and by up to 16% in commission and omission errors. This improvement however comes at the price of increased complexity and computational burden.

[1]  Philip H. Swain,et al.  Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Tee-Ann Teo,et al.  Analysis of Land Cover Classification Using Multi-Wavelength LiDAR System , 2017 .

[3]  Craig Glennie,et al.  Fusion of waveform LiDAR data and hyperspectral imagery for land cover classification , 2015 .

[4]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[5]  V. Wichmann,et al.  EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL OF MULTISPECTRAL AIRBORNE LIDAR FOR TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING AND LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION , 2015 .

[6]  T. Webster,et al.  Object-oriented land cover classification of lidar-derived surfaces , 2006 .

[7]  Nicolas David,et al.  Towards 3D lidar point cloud registration improvement using optimal neighborhood knowledge , 2013 .

[8]  Lori A. Magruder,et al.  Using dual-wavelength, full-waveform airborne lidar for surface classification and vegetation characterization , 2016 .

[9]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Automatic Spectral Rule-Based Preliminary Mapping of Calibrated Landsat TM and ETM+ Images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Feasibility of Multispectral Airborne Laser Scanning Data for Road Mapping , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[11]  J. Suomalainen,et al.  Full waveform hyperspectral LiDAR for terrestrial laser scanning. , 2012, Optics express.

[12]  J. Yackel,et al.  The Jeffries–Matusita distance for the case of complex Wishart distribution as a separability criterion for fully polarimetric SAR data , 2014 .

[13]  P. Axelsson DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models , 2000 .

[14]  Amba Shetty,et al.  Performance evaluation of hyperspectral classification algorithms on AVIRIS mineral data , 2016 .

[15]  J. Brasington,et al.  Object-based land cover classification using airborne LiDAR , 2008 .

[16]  Ahmed El-Rabbany,et al.  AIRBORNE MULTISPECTRAL LIDAR DATA FOR LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION AND LAND/WATER MAPPING USING DIFFERENT SPECTRAL INDEXES , 2016 .

[17]  William E. Carter,et al.  Capability Assessment and Performance Metrics for the Titan Multispectral Mapping Lidar , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Lin Du,et al.  Multispectral LiDAR Point Cloud Classification: A Two-Step Approach , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[19]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Testing LiDAR models of fractional cover across multiple forest ecozones , 2009 .

[20]  Craig Glennie,et al.  Review of Earth science research using terrestrial laser scanning , 2017 .

[21]  Przemysław Kupidura,et al.  Testing of Land Cover Classification from Multispectral Airborne Laser Scanning Data , 2016 .

[22]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[23]  Guihua Zhao,et al.  3D LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION BASED ON MULTISPECTRAL LIDAR POINT CLOUDS , 2016 .

[24]  Richard C. Olsen,et al.  Application of image classification techniques to multispectral lidar point cloud data , 2016, Defense + Security.

[25]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Object-based analysis of multispectral airborne laser scanner data for land cover classification and map updating , 2017 .

[26]  Yi-Hsing Tseng,et al.  Airborne Dual-Wavelength LiDAR Data for Classifying Land Cover , 2014, Remote. Sens..