A methodology to support multidisciplinary model-based water management

Quality assurance in model based water management is needed because of some frequently perceived shortcomings, e.g. a lack of mutual understanding between modelling team members, malpractice and a tendency of modellers to oversell model capabilities. Initiatives to support quality assurance focus on single domains and often follow a textbook approach with guidelines and checklists. A modelling process involves a complex set of activities executed by a team. To manage this complex, usually multidisciplinary process, to guide users through it and enhance the reproducibility of modelling work a software product has been developed, aiming at supporting the full modelling process by offering an ontological knowledge base (KB) and a Modelling Support Tool (MoST). The KB consists of a generic part for modelling, but also parts specific for various water management domains, for different types of users and for different levels of modelling complexity. MoST's guiding component filters relevant knowledge from the KB depending on the user profile and needs. Furthermore, MoST supports different types of users by monitoring what they actually do and by producing customized reports for diverse audiences. In this way MoST facilitates co-operation in teams, modelling project audits and re-use of experiences of previous modelling projects.

[1]  Michael Uschold,et al.  The Enterprise Ontology , 1998, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[2]  John R. Josephson,et al.  What Are They? Why Do We Need Them? , 1999 .

[3]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Modelling guidelinesterminology and guiding principles , 2004 .

[4]  C. Refsgaard,et al.  State-of-the-Art Report on Quality Assurance in modelling related to river basin management , 2002 .

[5]  Huub Scholten,et al.  Quality assessment of the simulation modeling process , 1999 .

[6]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Good Modelling Practice , 2008 .

[8]  Ayalew Kassahun,et al.  Quality assurance in model based water management - review of existing practice and outline of new approaches , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  R. H. van Waveren,et al.  Improving the quality of model-based decision support: good modelling practice in water management , 2001 .

[10]  R. H. van Waveren,et al.  Good Modelling Practice in Water Management , 2000 .

[11]  Huub Scholten,et al.  Quality assurance support tool for catchment-based modelling: a test on the HBV-NP model for eutrophication assessment , 2004 .

[12]  Huub Scholten,et al.  Support for model based water management with the HarmoniQuA toolbox , 2005 .

[13]  Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,et al.  The Ontology of Tasks and Methods , 1997 .

[14]  H. Scholten An ontological approach in quality assessment of modelling and simulation. , 2001 .

[15]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[16]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Putting ontologies to use , 1998, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[17]  W. N. Borst,et al.  Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse , 1997 .

[18]  H. van Waveren,et al.  Model for Success , 2000 .

[19]  Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,et al.  What are ontologies, and why do we need them? , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[20]  R. Kerry Rowe,et al.  Ground water models: scientific and regulatory applications , 1990 .