Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore.

PURPOSE To determine the epidemiology of refractive errors in an adult Chinese population in Singapore. METHODS A disproportionate, stratified, clustered, random-sampling procedure was used to select names of 2000 Chinese people aged 40 to 79 years from the 1996 Singapore electoral register in the Tanjong Pagar district in Singapore. These people were invited to a centralized clinic for a comprehensive eye examination, including refraction. Refraction was also performed on nonrespondents in their homes. Myopia, high myopia, and hyperopia were defined as a spherical equivalent (SE) in the right eye of less than -0.5 D, less than -5.0 D, and more than +0.5 D, respectively. Astigmatism was defined as less than -0.5 D of cylinder. Anisometropia was defined as a difference in SE of more than 1.0 D between the two eyes. Only phakic eyes were analyzed. RESULTS From 1717 eligible people, 1232 (71.8%) were examined. Adjusted to the 1997 Singapore population, the overall prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia was 38.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35.5, 42.1), 28.4% (95% CI: 25.3, 31.3), 37.8% (95% CI: 34.6, 41.1), and 15.9% (95% CI: 13.5, 18.4), respectively. The prevalence of high myopia was 9.1% (95% CI: 7.2, 11.2), with women having significantly higher rates than men. The age pattern of myopia was bimodal, with higher prevalence in the 40 to 49 and 70 to 81 age groups and lower prevalence between those age ranges. Prevalence was reversed in hyperopia, with a higher prevalence in subjects aged 50 to 69. There was a monotonic increase in prevalence with age for both astigmatism and anisometropia. Increasing educational levels, higher individual income, professional or office-related occupations, better housing, and greater severity of nuclear opacity were all significantly associated with higher rates of myopia, after adjustment for age and sex. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that whereas myopia is 1.5 to 2.5 times more prevalent in adult Chinese residing in Singapore than in similarly aged European-derived populations in the United States and Australia, the sociodemographic associations are similar.

[1]  H. Taylor,et al.  Prevalence and risk factors of myopia in Victoria, Australia. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  Wan Ariffin Bin Abdullah Singapore Med J , 1993 .

[3]  L. Garner,et al.  Change with age of the refractive index gradient of the human ocular lens. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  J Katz,et al.  Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in an adult inner city population. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  A. Hosaka Population studies — myopia experience in Japan , 1988, Acta ophthalmologica. Supplement.

[6]  O. Rasmussen INCIDENCE OF MYOPIA IN CHINA , 1936, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  S. Chia,et al.  The pattern of myopia in young Singaporean men. , 1988, Singapore medical journal.

[8]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  R D Sperduto,et al.  Prevalence of myopia in the United States. , 1983, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  S. Chew,et al.  Refractive errors in Singapore medical students. , 1990, Singapore medical journal.

[11]  R. Klein,et al.  Changes in refractive error over a 5-year interval in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  D. Verlee Ophthalmic survey in the Solomon Islands. , 1968, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  R. Klein,et al.  Refractive status in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  Joanne Katz,et al.  Epidemiology of myopia. , 2002, Epidemiologic Reviews.

[15]  R. Lowdon,et al.  A population-based survey of the prevalence of refractive error in Malawi. , 1995, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[16]  Chien-Jen Chen,et al.  Nation‐wide survey of myopia among schoolchildren in Taiwan, 1986 , 1988, Acta ophthalmologica. Supplement.

[17]  M. Belkin,et al.  Intelligence, education, and myopia in males. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  Y. Shih,et al.  Epidemiologic study of ocular refraction among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 1995. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  A J Adams,et al.  Myopia. The nature versus nurture debate goes on. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  H. Taylor,et al.  Predictability of Excimer Laser Treatment of Myopia , 1996 .

[21]  F. J. Slataper,et al.  AGE NORMS OF REFRACTION AND VISION , 1950 .

[22]  M. C. Leske,et al.  The Lens Opacities Classification System III , 1993 .

[23]  Vandeveer Mr The Hong Kong vision study: a pilot assessment of visual impairment in adults. , 1997 .

[24]  P. Mitchell,et al.  Refractive errors in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[25]  H R Taylor,et al.  Racial variations in vision. , 1981, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Refractive errors in a black adult population: the Barbados Eye Study. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  S. Hyams,et al.  Prevalence of refractive errors in adults over 40: a survey of 8102 eyes. , 1977, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  J. Angle,et al.  The epidemiology of myopia. , 1980, American journal of epidemiology.