Successful methods to reduce false-positive mammography interpretations.

[1]  E. Rubin.  Six-month follow-up: an alternative view. , 1999, Radiology.

[2]  E. Sickles.  Probably benign breast lesions: when should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol? , 1999, Radiology.

[3]  R. Blanks,et al.  A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme , 1998, Journal of medical screening.

[4]  E. Sickles.  False positive rate of screening mammography. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Findings at mammographic screening on only one standard projection: outcomes analysis. , 1998, Radiology.

[6]  R E Hendrick,et al.  American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  V. Moravan,et al.  Results from the Ontario breast screening program, 1990–1995 , 1998, Journal of medical screening.

[8]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  C J Baines,et al.  The Gothenburg breast screening trial , 1997, Cancer.

[10]  D. May,et al.  The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  S. Duffy,et al.  The Gothenburg breast screening trial , 1998, Cancer.

[12]  C. Boggis,et al.  The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma. , 1997, Clinical radiology.

[13]  A. Leitch,et al.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer: Update 1997 , 1997, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[14]  I Andersson,et al.  Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmö Mammographic Screening Program. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[15]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[16]  Clinical outcome of doubtful mammographic findings. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  C. E. Hoffmann,et al.  The South Australian Breast X-Ray Service: results from a statewide mammographic screening programme. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[18]  Craig A. Beam,et al.  Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  E A Sickles,et al.  Management of probably benign breast lesions. , 1995, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[20]  E A Sickles,et al.  Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  E. Sickles.  Probably Benign Breast Nodules: Follow-up of All Cases Requires Initial Full Problem-solving Imaging , 1995 .

[22]  L. Kan,et al.  Quality-oriented mass mammography screening. , 1995, Radiology.

[23]  J. Elmore,et al.  Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  E. Thurfjell,et al.  Population-based mammography screening in Swedish clinical practice: prevalence and incidence screening in Uppsala County. , 1994, Radiology.

[25]  E. Sickles.  Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. , 1994, Radiology.

[26]  E. Sickles,et al.  Breast Disease (SECOND SERIES TEST AND SYLLABUS) , 1993 .

[27]  L. Fajardo,et al.  Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  Roland Holland,et al.  The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. A review of the previous mammograms of interval and screen‐detected cancers , 1993, Cancer.

[29]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[30]  X. Varas,et al.  Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[31]  E A Sickles,et al.  Quality assurance. How to audit your own mammography practice. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[32]  G. W. Eklund,et al.  The art of mammographic positioning. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[33]  L. Tabár,et al.  Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[34]  C B Sayler,et al.  Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions. , 1991, Radiology.

[35]  E. Sickles.  Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. , 1991, Radiology.

[36]  M A Helvie,et al.  Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield. , 1991, Radiology.

[37]  I. Suramo,et al.  Mammography screening--reasons for recall and the influence of experience on recall in the Finnish system. , 1990, Clinical radiology.

[38]  E A Sickles,et al.  Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinations. , 1990, Radiology.

[39]  E. Sickles.  Combining spot-compression and other special views to maximize mammographic information. , 1989, Radiology.

[40]  O. Gatewood,et al.  Equivocal mammographic findings: evaluation with spot compression. , 1989, Radiology.

[41]  E. Sickles.  Practical solutions to common mammographic problems: tailoring the examination. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  S. Feig,et al.  The importance of supplementary mammographic views to diagnostic accuracy. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[43]  F. Hall,et al.  Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. , 1988, Radiology.

[44]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Xeroradiography of the breast: overview of 21,057 consecutive cases. , 1987, Radiology.

[45]  W. Logan,et al.  Use of special mammographic views to maximize radiographic information. , 1987, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[46]  L. Tabár,et al.  Significant reduction in advanced breast cancer. Results of the first seven years of mammography screening in Kopparberg, Sweden. , 1985, Diagnostic imaging in clinical medicine.

[47]  M. Moskowitz,et al.  Breast cancer missed by mammography. , 1979, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.