Interrogating urban experiments

ABSTRACT The notion of the “urban experiment” has become increasingly prevalent and popular as a guiding concept and trope used by both scholars and policymakers, as well as by corporate actors with a stake in the future of the city. In this paper, we critically engage with this emerging focus on “urban experiments”, and with its articulation through the associated concepts of “living labs”, “future labs”, “urban labs” and the like. A critical engagement with the notion of urban experimentation is now not only useful, but a necessity: we introduce seven specific areas that need critical attention when considering urban experiments: these are focused on normativity, crisis discourses, the definition of “experimental subjects”, boundaries and boundedness, historical precedents, “dark” experiments and non-human experimental agency.

[1]  F. M. Butlin,et al.  To-morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform. , 1899 .

[2]  J. Lorimer,et al.  Wild experiments at the Oostvaardersplassen: rethinking environmentalism in the Anthropocene , 2014 .

[3]  Simon Joss,et al.  Sustainable–Smart–Resilient–Low Carbon–Eco–Knowledge Cities; Making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization , 2015 .

[4]  F. Geels.  Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective , 2010 .

[5]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Places and Spaces of Sustainability Transitions: Geographical Contributions to an Emerging Research and Policy Field , 2012 .

[6]  Trent Brown,et al.  Sustainability as empty signifier: its rise, fall, and radical potential , 2016 .

[7]  Halina Szejnwald Brown,et al.  Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: The case of a zero-energy residential building , 2008 .

[8]  M. Katsioloudes.  Socio-technical analysis: a normative model for participatory planning , 1996 .

[9]  Jon Silver.  Incremental infrastructures: material improvisation and social collaboration across post-colonial Accra , 2014 .

[10]  Joshua Evans.  Trials and Tribulations: Problematizing the City through/as Urban Experimentation , 2016 .

[11]  James Evans.  Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city , 2011 .

[12]  Harriet Bulkeley,et al.  An urban politics of climate change : experimentation and the governing of socio-technical transitions , 2015 .

[13]  E. Swyngedouw.  Apocalypse Now! Fear and Doomsday Pleasures , 2013 .

[14]  H. Bulkeley,et al.  Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change , 2013 .

[15]  J. Condie,et al.  Dialogues of Sustainable Urbanisation: Social Science Research and Transitions to Urban Contexts , 2015 .

[16]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The (non-)politics of managing low carbon socio-technical transitions , 2009 .

[17]  Kim Kullman.  Geographies of Experiment/Experimental Geographies: A Rough Guide , 2013 .

[18]  D. Burton-Christie.  Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster , 2000 .

[19]  E. Shove,et al.  Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management , 2007 .

[20]  Silvia Pasquetti.  Negotiating control , 2015 .

[21]  James W. Evans,et al.  The experimental city : new modes and prospects of urban transformation , 2016 .

[22]  Federico Caprotti.  Eco-Cities and the Transition to Low Carbon Economies , 2014 .

[23]  H. Bulkeley,et al.  A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities , 2013, Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions.

[24]  Arthur P. Molella,et al.  Invented Edens: Techno-Cities of the Twentieth Century , 2008 .

[25]  M. Bradford,et al.  Re-Thinking the Urban Development Corporation 'Experiment': The Case of Central Manchester, Leeds and Bristol , 2000 .

[26]  Silvia Pasquetti,et al.  Durable camps: the state, the urban, the everyday , 2015 .

[27]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  A review of sociotechnical systems theory: a classic concept for new command and control paradigms , 2008 .

[28]  Jonathan Rutherford,et al.  Energy transition and city–region planning: understanding the spatial politics of systemic change , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[29]  Einar M. Rønquist,et al.  Foreword , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[30]  E. Swyngedouw.  The City as a Hybrid -- On Nature, Society and Cyborg Urbanisation , 1996 .

[31]  M. Lawhon,et al.  Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[32]  Vanesa Castán Broto,et al.  Social housing and low carbon transitions in Ljubljana, Slovenia , 2012 .

[33]  Noel Longhurst.  The Totnes Pound: A grassroots technological niche , 2012 .

[34]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Space and scale in socio-technical transitions , 2012 .

[35]  Dustin Mulvaney,et al.  The political economy of the ‘just transition’ , 2013 .

[36]  M. Crang,et al.  Negotiating the urban smart grid: Socio-technical experimentation in the city of Austin , 2016 .

[37]  E. Fontanari.  Confined to the threshold , 2015 .

[38]  James W. Evans,et al.  ‘Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Lower Your Carbon Footprint!’ — Urban Laboratories and the Governance of Low-Carbon Futures , 2014 .

[39]  F. Geels.  Technological Transitions And System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary And Socio-technical Analysis , 2005 .

[40]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector , 2012 .

[41]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[42]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[43]  S. Glendinning,et al.  What can we learn about transitions for sustainability from infrastructure shocks , 2014 .

[44]  M. Kearnes,et al.  Urban Wild Things: A Cosmopolitical Experiment , 2005 .

[45]  Simon Joss.  Sustainable Cities: Governing for Urban Innovation , 2015 .

[46]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Rethinking urban water management: Experimentation as a way forward? , 2011 .