Additive Manufacturing: Policy Needed
暂无分享,去创建一个
The invention and adoption of new manufacturing technologies is arguably critical to maintaining national competitiveness in civil and military aviation. We identify two intertwined problems facing policymakers who seek to expedite adoption of metallic additive manufacturing (MAM) in aviation without compromising safety. First, there is as yet insufficient ability to reliably predict the mechanical properties of MAM-produced parts. Second, consensus standards do not yet exist to adequately control MAM processes for safety-critical components, or to economically and reliably test finished parts. In response, we recommend, first, that policymakers fund and steward the collection and dissemination of the data needed to advance MAM from art to science. Second, strategies must be developed to allow industry to learn by doing: for example, by applying MAM to general aviation. Third, we urge a flexible regulatory posture; perhaps by subjecting rules to sunset clauses that require a substantial rethink at a specified future time.
[1] A. Macpherson,et al. Boeing’s Diffusion of Commercial Aircraft Technology to Japan: Surrendering the U.S. Industry for Foreign Financial Support , 2007 .
[2] Shawn P. Moylan,et al. Applicability of Existing Materials Testing Standards for Additive Manufacturing Materials , 2014 .
[3] Marvin A. Sirbu,et al. Technological Choice in Voluntary Standards Committees: An Empirical Analysis. , 1990 .
[4] William E. Frazier,et al. Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review , 2014, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.