Decentralized spectrum allocation in D2D underlying cellular networks

The proliferation of novel network access devices and demand for high quality of service by the end users are proving to be insufficient and are straining the existing wireless cellular network capacity. An economic and promising alternate to enhance the spectral efficiency and network throughput is device to device (D2D) communication. However, enabling D2D communication poses significant challenges pertaining to the interference management. In this paper, we address the resource allocation problem for underlay D2D pairs. First, we formulate the resource allocation optimization problem with an objective to maximizes the throughput of all D2D pairs by imposing interference constraints for protecting the cellular users. Second, to solve the underlying mixed-integer non linear resource allocation problem, we propose a stable, self-organizing and distributed solution using matching theory. Finally, we simulate our proposition to validate the convergence, cellular user protection, and network throughput gains achieved by the proposal. Simulation results reveal that D2D pairs can achieve significant throughput gains (i.e., up to 45 - 91%) while protecting the cellular users compared to the scenario in which no D2D pairs exist.

[1]  Lingyang Song,et al.  Resource Management for Device-to-Device Underlay Communication , 2013, SpringerBriefs in Computer Science.

[2]  Visa Koivunen,et al.  Interference-Aware Resource Allocation for Device-to-Device Radio Underlaying Cellular Networks , 2009, VTC Spring 2009 - IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[3]  Walid Saad,et al.  Context-Aware Small Cell Networks: How Social Metrics Improve Wireless Resource Allocation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Taoka Hidekazu,et al.  Scenarios for 5G mobile and wireless communications: the vision of the METIS project , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Walid Saad,et al.  Matching theory for future wireless networks: fundamentals and applications , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 2013, Am. Math. Mon..

[7]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Five disruptive technology directions for 5G , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Song Guo,et al.  A Truthful Double Auction for Device-to-Device Communications in Cellular Networks , 2016, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[9]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[10]  Alvin E. Roth Deferred acceptance algorithms: history, theory, practice, and open questions , 2008, Int. J. Game Theory.

[11]  Jorma Lilleberg,et al.  Spectrum Sharing Scheme Between Cellular Users and Ad-hoc Device-to-Device Users , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[12]  Olav Tirkkonen,et al.  Resource Sharing Optimization for Device-to-Device Communication Underlaying Cellular Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[13]  Geoffrey Ye Li,et al.  Device-to-Device Communications Underlaying Cellular Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[14]  B. Aazhang,et al.  Cellular networks with an overlaid device to device network , 2008, 2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[15]  Yung Yi,et al.  REFIM: A Practical Interference Management in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.