Wearable sensing for rehabilitation after stroke: Bimanual jerk asymmetry encodes unique information about the variability of upper extremity recovery

Wearable sensing is a new tool for quantifying upper extremity (UE) rehabilitation after stroke. However, it is unclear whether it provides information beyond what is available through standard clinical assessments. To investigate this question, people with a chronic stroke (n=9) wore accelerometers on both wrists for 9 hours on a single day during their daily activities. We used principal components analysis (PCA) to characterize how novel kinematic measures of jerk and acceleration asymmetry, along with conventional measures of limb use asymmetry and clinical function, explained the behavioral variance of UE recovery across participants. The first PC explained 55% of the variance and described a strong correlation between standard clinical assessments and limb use asymmetry, as has been observed previously. The second PC explained a further 31% of the variance and described a strong correlation between bimanual magnitude and jerk asymmetry. Because of the nature of PCA, this second PC is mathematically orthogonal to the first and thus uncorrelated with the clinical assessments. Therefore, kinematic metrics obtainable from bimanual accelerometry, including bimanual jerk asymmetry, encoded additional information about UE recovery. One interpretation is that the first PC relates to “functional status” and the second to “movement quality”. We also describe a new graphical format for presenting bimanual wrist accelerometry data that facilitates identification of asymmetries.

[1]  Janice K. Ewing Whither the Garden Path? Some Gnomes Revisited and Some Others Worth Considering , 2000, Brain Impairment.

[2]  C. Lang,et al.  Quantifying Real-World Upper-Limb Activity in Nondisabled Adults and Adults With Chronic Stroke , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[3]  Robert E. Mahony,et al.  Nonlinear Complementary Filters on the Special Orthogonal Group , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  Eric Wade,et al.  Spectral Analyses of Wrist Motion in Individuals Poststroke , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[5]  Vicky Chan,et al.  The variable relationship between arm and hand use: A rationale for using finger magnetometry to complement wrist accelerometry when measuring daily use of the upper extremity , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  S. Kilbreath,et al.  Frequency of hand use in healthy older persons. , 2005, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[7]  C. Lang,et al.  An Accelerometry-Based Methodology for Assessment of Real-World Bilateral Upper Extremity Activity , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  E. Taub,et al.  Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter. , 2000, Stroke.

[9]  Gitendra Uswatte,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Motor disorder in Huntington's disease begins as a dysfunction in error feedback control , 2000, Nature.

[11]  J. Verbunt,et al.  Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Jin-Hwa Jung,et al.  Effects of bilateral training on motor function, amount of activity and activity intensity measured with an accelerometer of patients with stroke , 2015, Journal of physical therapy science.

[13]  J. Eng,et al.  Exploring the Role of Accelerometers in the Measurement of Real World Upper-Limb Use After Stroke , 2015, Brain Impairment.

[14]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  The Manumeter: A Wearable Device for Monitoring Daily Use of the Wrist and Fingers , 2014, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[15]  C. Winstein,et al.  Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  Harold D. Delaney,et al.  Motor deficits after left or right hemisphere damage due to stroke or tumor , 1981, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  On the analysis of movement smoothness , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[18]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  The Manumeter: A non-obtrusive wearable device for monitoring spontaneous use of the wrist and fingers , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[19]  H. Rodgers,et al.  Accelerometer measurement of upper extremity movement after stroke: a systematic review of clinical studies , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[20]  N. Hogan,et al.  Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[22]  T. Olsen,et al.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.