Nucleosome depletion at yeast terminators is not intrinsic and can occur by a transcriptional mechanism linked to 3’-end formation
暂无分享,去创建一个
Kevin Struhl | Yong Zhang | X Shirley Liu | K. Struhl | Z. Moqtaderi | Yong Zhang | X. Liu | Xiaochun Fan | Zarmik Moqtaderi | Xiaochun Fan | Yi Jin | Yi Jin | X. Liu | X. Liu
[1] J Seth Strattan,et al. Nucleosomes unfold completely at a transcriptionally active promoter. , 2003, Molecular cell.
[2] W Hörz,et al. Sequence specific cleavage of DNA by micrococcal nuclease. , 1981, Nucleic acids research.
[3] Steven M. Johnson,et al. A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning. , 2008, Genome research.
[4] Ronald W. Davis,et al. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast , 2007, Nature Genetics.
[5] Eran Segal,et al. Evidence against a genomic code for nucleosome positioning? , 2010 .
[6] Irene K. Moore,et al. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome , 2009, Nature.
[7] H. Reinke,et al. Histones are first hyperacetylated and then lose contact with the activated PHO5 promoter. , 2003, Molecular cell.
[8] N. Krogan,et al. Transitions in RNA polymerase II elongation complexes at the 3′ ends of genes , 2004, The EMBO journal.
[9] Cizhong Jiang,et al. A compiled and systematic reference map of nucleosome positions across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2009, Genome Biology.
[10] Irene K. Moore,et al. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning , 2006, Nature.
[11] Lani F. Wu,et al. Genome-Scale Identification of Nucleosome Positions in S. cerevisiae , 2005, Science.
[12] J. Lieb,et al. Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide , 2004, Nature Genetics.
[13] J. Boeke,et al. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR‐mediated gene disruption and other applications , 1998, Yeast.
[14] Kevin Struhl,et al. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast. , 2005, Molecular cell.
[15] Yaniv Lubling,et al. Distinct Modes of Regulation by Chromatin Encoded through Nucleosome Positioning Signals , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[16] Clifford A. Meyer,et al. Model-based analysis of tiling-arrays for ChIP-chip , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] William Stafford Noble,et al. Nucleosome positioning signals in genomic DNA. , 2007, Genome research.
[18] U. K. Laemmli,et al. The anchor-away technique: rapid, conditional establishment of yeast mutant phenotypes. , 2008, Molecular cell.
[19] Kevin Struhl,et al. Preferential Accessibility of the Yeast his3 Promoter Is Determined by a General Property of the DNA Sequence, Not by Specific Elements , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[20] L. Steinmetz,et al. Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast , 2009, Nature.
[21] Bryan J Venters,et al. A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. , 2008, Genome research.
[22] K. Struhl,et al. Histone Acetylation at Promoters Is Differentially Affected by Specific Activators and Repressors , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[23] Kevin Struhl,et al. Evidence for Eviction and Rapid Deposition of Histones upon Transcriptional Elongation by RNA Polymerase II , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[24] Timothy B. Stockwell,et al. Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies , 2009, Genome Biology.
[25] K. Struhl,et al. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[26] A. Kristjuhan,et al. Evidence for distinct mechanisms facilitating transcript elongation through chromatin in vivo , 2004, The EMBO journal.
[27] G. Felsenfeld,et al. DNAase I, DNAase II and staphylococcal nuclease cut at different, yet symmetrically located, sites in the nucleosome core , 1978, Cell.
[28] Kevin Struhl,et al. Extensive chromatin fragmentation improves enrichment of protein binding sites in chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments , 2008, Nucleic acids research.
[29] K. Struhl,et al. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation for Determining the Association of Proteins with Specific Genomic Sequences In Vivo , 2004, Current protocols in molecular biology.
[30] Michael R. Green,et al. Dissecting the Regulatory Circuitry of a Eukaryotic Genome , 1998, Cell.
[31] Steven J. M. Jones,et al. Dynamic Remodeling of Individual Nucleosomes Across a Eukaryotic Genome in Response to Transcriptional Perturbation , 2007, PLoS biology.
[32] Eran Segal,et al. Nucleosome sequence preferences influence in vivo nucleosome organization , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[33] Xin Wang,et al. A RSC/Nucleosome Complex Determines Chromatin Architecture and Facilitates Activator Binding , 2010, Cell.
[34] Nir Friedman,et al. High-resolution nucleosome mapping reveals transcription-dependent promoter packaging. , 2010, Genome research.
[35] Kevin Struhl,et al. Evidence against a genomic code for nucleosome positioning Reply to “Nucleosome sequence preferences influence in vivo nucleosome organization” , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.