Visualization of reproduction toxicity of QDs for in vitro oocytes maturation

Recently, QDs have attracted enormous attention for their potential applications ranging from physics to medicine. However, the toxicity of QDs impends its development in clinics experiment. In this work, we investigated the reproduction toxicity of QDs for in vitro oocytes matureation. The immatured oocytes of 28 day Kunming mice were harvested and cultured in vitro. And the biocompatible lysine-coated CdSe/CdS/ZnS QDs were incubated with oocytes for a certain periods. Then, each single oocyte-cumulus-complex was visualized under Leica scanning confocal microscope and rendered the 3-dimensional image. After 24 hrs, the maturation rate of oocytes decreased obviously (from 62% to 21.8%) with the concentration of QDs increasing. The 3D rendered images of oocyte-cumulus-complex showed that the most QDs distributed inside the cumulus, but no QDs entered oocytes. In summary, the results suggeste that the oocytes maturation process has high susceptibility for disturbances of QDs. The more QDs were uptaken by cumulus cells, the lower maturation rate of in vitro oocytes. We presume the QD interfere the process of oocytes maturation by dysfunctioning the cumulus cells or disturb the signal-interaction between germ cell and somatic cell. To our best knowledge, this is the first time that 3D visulization methods are used to analysize the reproduction toxicity of in vitro oocytes. The further toxicity mechanism of QDs for oocytes in vitro is undergoing investigation.

[1]  Robert Langer,et al.  Quantum dot-aptamer conjugates for synchronous cancer imaging, therapy, and sensing of drug delivery based on bi-fluorescence resonance energy transfer. , 2007, Nano letters.

[2]  Maria Angela Vandelli,et al.  Nanoparticulate drug carriers based on hybrid poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide)-dendron structures. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[3]  S. Gambhir,et al.  Quantum Dots for Live Cells, in Vivo Imaging, and Diagnostics , 2005, Science.

[4]  Hassan S. Bazzi,et al.  Differences in subcellular distribution and toxicity of green and red emitting CdTe quantum dots , 2005, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[5]  Sailing He,et al.  Quantum rod bioconjugates as targeted probes for confocal and two-photon fluorescence imaging of cancer cells. , 2007, Nano letters.

[6]  Hong Ding,et al.  Bioconjugated quantum rods as targeted probes for efficient transmigration across an in vitro blood-brain barrier. , 2008, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[7]  Christopher G Thanos,et al.  Targeted nanoparticle-based drug delivery and diagnosis , 2007, Journal of drug targeting.

[8]  Ron C. Hardman A Toxicologic Review of Quantum Dots: Toxicity Depends on Physicochemical and Environmental Factors , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  Sailing He,et al.  Imaging pancreatic cancer using surface-functionalized quantum dots. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[10]  S. Nie,et al.  Quantum dot bioconjugates for ultrasensitive nonisotopic detection. , 1998, Science.

[11]  Kelly Y. Kim,et al.  Nanotechnology platforms and physiological challenges for cancer therapeutics , 2007 .

[12]  S. Nie,et al.  Nanotechnology applications in cancer. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[13]  D. Balding,et al.  HLA Sequence Polymorphism and the Origin of Humans , 2006 .

[14]  Johan Smitz,et al.  Preantral follicle culture as a novel in vitro assay in reproductive toxicology testing in mammalian oocytes. , 2004, Mutagenesis.

[15]  Amane Shiohara,et al.  On the Cyto‐Toxicity Caused by Quantum Dots , 2004, Microbiology and immunology.

[16]  Helmuth Möhwald,et al.  Incorporating Fluorescent CdTe Nanocrystals into a Hydrogel via Hydrogen Bonding: Toward Fluorescent Microspheres with Temperature-Responsive Properties , 2005 .