Effects of Volume Conductor Asymmetry on Non-Invasive Fetal ECG Extraction

Objective: Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography (NI-FECG) shows promise for capturing novel physiological information that may indicate signs of fetal distress. However, significant deterioration in NI-FECG signal quality occurs during the presence of a highly non-conductive layer known as vernix caseosa which forms on the fetal body surface beginning in approximately the 28th week of gestation. This work investigates asymmetric modelling of the maternal-fetal anatomy in accordance with clinical observations and assesses its impacts for NI-FECG signal processing. Methods: We develop a process for simulating dynamic maternal-fetal abdominal ECG mixtures using a synthetic cardiac source model embedded in a finite element volume conductor. Using this process, changes in NI-FECG signal morphology are assessed in an extensive set of finite element models including spatially variable distributions of vernix caseosa. Results: Our simulations show that volume conductor asymmetry can result in over 70% error in the observed T/QRS ratio and significant changes to signal morphology compared to a homogeneous volume conductor model. Conclusion: Volume conductor effects must be considered when analyzing T/QRS ratios obtained via NI-FECG and should be considered in future algorithm benchmarks using simulated data. Significance: This work shows that without knowledge of the influence of volume conductor effects, clinical evaluation of the T/QRS ratio derived via NI-FECG should be avoided.

[1]  N. Fowler,et al.  Anatomic and Electrocardiographic Position of the Heart , 1951, Circulation.

[2]  T. Akiba.  Studies on biological actions of vernix caseosa. , 1955, Journal of the Japanese Obstetrical & Gynecological Society.

[3]  J. Emery,et al.  THE WEIGHT OF THE VENTRICLES IN THE LATER WEEKS OF INTRA-UTERINE LIFE , 1960, British heart journal.

[4]  B. Widrow,et al.  Adaptive noise cancelling: Principles and applications , 1975 .

[5]  J. Lekkala,et al.  Comparative study of the normal vector magnetocardiogram and vector electrocardiogram. , 1986, Journal of electrocardiology.

[6]  C. Comstock.  Normal Fetal Heart Axis and Position , 1987, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  Onno W. Weier,et al.  On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method (EEG application) , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  David B. Geselowitz,et al.  On the theory of the electrocardiogram , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[9]  A. van Oosterom,et al.  The effect of changes in the conductive medium on the fetal ECG throughout gestation. , 1989, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[10]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields , 1995 .

[11]  Gary L. Miller,et al.  Control Volume Meshes Using Sphere Packing , 1998, IRREGULAR.

[12]  J. Stinstra.  The reliability of the fetal magnetocardiogram , 2001 .

[13]  M. Peters,et al.  The Influence of Fetoabdominal Tissues on Fetal ECGs and MCGs , 2002, Archives of physiology and biochemistry.

[14]  P. Celsis,et al.  Effects of skull thickness, anisotropy, and inhomogeneity on forward EEG/ERP computations using a spherical three‐dimensional resistor mesh model , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[15]  K. Rosen,et al.  The effects of intrapartum hypoxia on the fetal QT interval , 2004, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  V. Narendran,et al.  Vernix Caseosa in Neonatal Adaptation , 2005, Journal of Perinatology.

[17]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  A robust fetal ECG detection method for abdominal recordings , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[18]  Christian Jutten,et al.  Multichannel ECG and Noise Modeling: Application to Maternal and Fetal ECG Signals , 2007, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[19]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  MeshLab: an Open-Source Mesh Processing Tool , 2008, Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference.

[20]  David A. Boas,et al.  Tetrahedral mesh generation from volumetric binary and grayscale images , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[21]  E. Mulder,et al.  Fetal electrocardiography: feasibility of long‐term fetal heart rate recordings , 2009, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[22]  G. Clifford,et al.  A Review of Fetal ECG Signal Processing; Issues and Promising Directions. , 2010, The open pacing, electrophysiology & therapy journal.

[23]  Scott Makeig,et al.  Neuroelectromagnetic Forward Head Modeling Toolbox , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[24]  Jens Haueisen,et al.  Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[25]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Whole-body pregnant woman modeling by digital geometry processing with detailed uterofetal unit based on medical images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[27]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[28]  G. Clifford,et al.  Clinically accurate fetal ECG parameters acquired from maternal abdominal sensors. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  M. Clerc,et al.  Comparison of Boundary Element and Finite Element Approaches to the EEG Forward Problem , 2012, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[30]  B. Hayes-Gill,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of fetal heart rate monitoring using maternal abdominal surface electrodes , 2012, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[31]  M. Ugander,et al.  Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The Relationship between the Electrocardiogram and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2014, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[32]  N Varsier,et al.  A comprehensive tool for image-based generation of fetus and pregnant women mesh models for numerical dosimetry studies , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Gari D Clifford,et al.  Non-invasive fetal ECG analysis , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[34]  Hagen Malberg,et al.  Robust fetal ECG extraction and detection from abdominal leads , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[35]  Sebastian Zaunseder,et al.  An ECG simulator for generating maternal-foetal activity mixtures on abdominal ECG recordings , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[36]  Hang Si,et al.  TetGen, a Delaunay-Based Quality Tetrahedral Mesh Generator , 2015, ACM Trans. Math. Softw..

[37]  Gari D Clifford,et al.  An open-source framework for stress-testing non-invasive foetal ECG extraction algorithms , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[38]  T. Fuchs.  Values of T/QRS ratio in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction , 2016, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[39]  Gari D Clifford,et al.  A practical guide to non-invasive foetal electrocardiogram extraction and analysis , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[40]  G. Clifford,et al.  Evaluation of the fetal QT interval using non-invasive fetal ECG technology , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[41]  R. Vullings,et al.  Orientation of the electrical heart axis in mid-term pregnancy. , 2016, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[42]  I. B. Gultekin,et al.  To what extent do the presentation of fetus, amniotic fluid index and fetal weight at term affect the cardiac axis? , 2016, Journal of electrocardiology.

[43]  G. Clifford,et al.  Monitoring fetal maturation—objectives, techniques and indices of autonomic function , 2017, Physiological measurement.

[44]  Meade Bernard,et al.  Spartan HPC-Cloud Hybrid: Delivering Performance and Flexibility , 2017 .

[45]  R. Oberhoffer,et al.  Fetal cardiac time intervals in healthy pregnancies – an observational study by fetal ECG (Monica Healthcare System) , 2018, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[46]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  The FieldTrip-SimBio pipeline for EEG forward solutions , 2018, Biomedical engineering online.