Design of patient specific dental implant using FE analysis and computational intelligence techniques

Display Omitted Genetic algorithm is successfully used for designing dental implant to achieve the desired microstrain and implant stress.Hybridization of desirability function with the ANN converted the FEA findings to make the objective.It is seen that the optimum value of microstrain differed from the desirable value with improved bone quality.The optimum solutions lead to a guideline for developing patient specific implant development.The FEA based validation of the optimum solutions shows variation of the result well within accepted limit. Genetic algorithm is employed for optimum designing of patient specific dental implants with varying dimension and porosity. It is generally recommended that, the micro strain at the bone implant interface should be around 15003000. The porous dental implant needs to be designed in such a way that the micro stain remains within the above range, and a value close to 2500 micro strain is most desired. In this design problem, the most important constraint is that the implant stress should be limited within 350MPa as titanium alloy was considered as implant material. The above attributes are to be achieved per the varying bone conditions of the patients to design a patient specific prosthesis. This design problem is expressed as an optimization problem using the desirability function, where the data generated by finite element analysis is converted to an artificial neural network model. The output of the neural network model is converted within a range of 01 using desirability function, where the maximum value is reached at the most desired micro strain of 2500. This hybrid model of neural network and desirability function is used as the objective function for the optimization problem using genetic algorithm. Another neural network model describing the implant stress is used as the constraint. The optimum solutions achieved from ANN and GA are validated again through finite element method. Without doing stress analysis by FEM, the ANN models are used for measuring the fitness of the members of the population during optimization. This would predict the optimum dimension of dental implant made of Titanium alloy with most favorable porosity percentage for better ossiointegration for a patient per bone condition.

[1]  Paul E. Gatza,et al.  The Use of Experimental Design and Computerized Data Analysis in Elastomer Development Studies. , 1973 .

[2]  Dilip Kumar Pratihar,et al.  A combined neural network and genetic algorithm based approach for optimally designed femoral implant having improved primary stability , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[3]  Subhas Ganguly,et al.  Genetic algorithm based optimization for multi-physical properties of HSLA steel through hybridization of neural network and desirability function , 2009 .

[4]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization with Sequential Niche Technique for Dynamic Finite Element Model Updating , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[5]  Y. Maeda,et al.  Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[6]  R. Bader,et al.  Relationship Between Mechanical Properties and Bone Mineral Density of Human Femoral Bone Retrieved from Patients with Osteoarthritis , 2012, The open orthopaedics journal.

[7]  G. Liu,et al.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  Tomasz Łodygowski,et al.  NUMERICAL COMPLEXITY OF SELECTED BIOMECHANICAL PROBLEMS , 2006 .

[9]  H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia Neural Networks and Information in Materials Science , 2009 .

[10]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[11]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Investigating the role of metallic fillers in particulate reinforced flexible mould material composites using evolutionary algorithms , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Optimization and Machine Learning , 2022 .

[13]  James A. Anderson,et al.  An Introduction To Neural Networks , 1998 .

[14]  T. Łodygowski,et al.  The Screw Loosening and Fatigue Analyses of Three Dimensional Dental Implant Model , 2006 .

[15]  G. Derringer,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables , 1980 .

[16]  C. Goodacre,et al.  Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Simulated Binary Crossover for Continuous Search Space , 1995, Complex Syst..

[18]  John L. Williams,et al.  SHAPE OPTIMIZATION OF DENTAL IMPLANT DESIGNS UNDER OBLIQUE LOADING USING THE p-VERSION FINITE ELEMENT METHOD , 2002 .

[19]  R. Porcher,et al.  Individual Smallest Detectable Difference in Bone Mineral Density Measurements , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  Shubhabrata Datta,et al.  Optimization of mechanical property and shape recovery behavior of Ti-(∼49 at.%) Ni alloy using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm , 2013 .

[21]  P. Apse,et al.  Dental Implant Design and Biological Effects on Bone-Implant Interface , 2004 .

[22]  James Laney Williams,et al.  Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[23]  Mohamed I. El-Anwar,et al.  A three dimensional finite element study on dental implant design , 2011 .

[24]  Alper Çağlar,et al.  Effects of mesiodistal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[25]  Y Akagawa,et al.  A mimic osseointegrated implant model for three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[26]  N. Wakabayashi,et al.  Stress analysis in edentulous mandibular bone supporting implant-retained 1-piece or multiple superstructures. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[27]  O. Miyakawa,et al.  Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant--a three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2005, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[28]  Shubhabrata Datta,et al.  Soft computing techniques in advancement of structural metals , 2013 .

[29]  Tomasz Łodygowski,et al.  Fatigue algorithm for dental implant , 2006 .

[30]  P. Chattopadhyay,et al.  Informatics based design of prosthetic Ti alloys , 2014 .

[31]  Haruka Kusakari,et al.  Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[32]  Kumar,et al.  Neural Networks a Classroom Approach , 2004 .

[33]  M R Rieger,et al.  Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[34]  M. Mahfouf,et al.  Imprecise knowledge based design and development of titanium alloys for prosthetic applications. , 2016, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[35]  Chao Xu,et al.  Optimal design of viscoelastic damping structures using layerwise finite element analysis and multi-objective genetic algorithm , 2015 .

[36]  Russell G. Death,et al.  An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data , 2004 .

[37]  A. Miraoui,et al.  Two-Stage Surrogate Model for Finite-Element-Based Optimization of Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.