The Distribution of Polar Ejection Forces Determines the Amplitude of Chromosome Directional Instability

BACKGROUND Polar ejection forces have often been hypothesized to guide directional instability of mitotic chromosomes, but a direct link has never been established. This has led, in part, to the resurgence of alternative theories. By taking advantage of extremely precise femtosecond pulsed laser microsurgery, we abruptly alter the magnitude of polar ejection forces by severing vertebrate chromosome arms. RESULTS Reduction of polar ejection forces increases the amplitude of directional instability without altering other characteristics, thus establishing a direct link between polar ejection forces and the direction of chromosome movements. We find that polar ejection forces limit the range of chromosome oscillations by increasing the probability that motors at a leading kinetochore abruptly disengage or turn off, leading to a direction reversal. CONCLUSIONS From the relation between the change in oscillation amplitude and the amount a chromosome arm is shortened, we are able to map the distribution of polar ejection forces across the spindle, which is surprisingly different from previously assumed distributions. These results allow us to differentiate between the mechanisms proposed to underlie the directional instability of chromosomes.

[1]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Ablation of cytoskeletal filaments and mitochondria in live cells using a femtosecond laser nanoscissor. , 2005, Mechanics & chemistry of biosystems : MCB.

[2]  Roland Eils,et al.  Global Chromosome Positions Are Transmitted through Mitosis in Mammalian Cells , 2003, Cell.

[3]  E. Salmon,et al.  Microtubule assembly and kinetochore directional instability in vertebrate monopolar spindles: implications for the mechanism of chromosome congression. , 1994, Journal of cell science.

[4]  N. Suhm,et al.  Non-thermal ablation of neural tissue with femtosecond laser pulses , 1998 .

[5]  Tamir Gonen,et al.  Tension applied through the Dam1 complex promotes microtubule elongation providing a direct mechanism for length control in mitosis , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[6]  E. Salmon,et al.  The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[7]  J. S. Heslop-Harrison,et al.  Chromosome arrangements in human fibroblasts at mitosis , 1991, Human Genetics.

[8]  G. Brouhard,et al.  Microtubule movements on the arms of mitotic chromosomes: polar ejection forces quantified in vitro. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  E D Salmon,et al.  Kinetochore motility after severing between sister centromeres using laser microsurgery: evidence that kinetochore directional instability and position is regulated by tension. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[10]  K J Halbhuber,et al.  Intracellular nanosurgery with near infrared femtosecond laser pulses. , 1999, Cellular and molecular biology.

[11]  Gerard Mourou,et al.  Machining of sub-micron holes using a femtosecond laser at 800 nm , 1995 .

[12]  D. Chatenay,et al.  Reversible and irreversible unfolding of mitotic newt chromosomes by applied force. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[13]  Ajit P. Joglekar,et al.  A simple, mechanistic model for directional instability during mitotic chromosome movements. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[14]  J. T.,et al.  Poleward Kinetochore Fiber Movement Occurs during Both Metaphase and Anaphase-A in Newt Lung Cell Mitosis , 2002 .

[15]  Gerard Mourou,et al.  Optics at critical intensity: applications to nanomorphing. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  I. Gabashvili,et al.  "Dumb" versus "smart" kinetochore models for chromosome congression during mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells. , 1999, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[17]  Linda Wordeman,et al.  The kinesin-8 motor Kif18A suppresses kinetochore movements to control mitotic chromosome alignment. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[18]  D. Agard,et al.  Chromosome elasticity and mitotic polar ejection force measured in living Drosophila embryos by four-dimensional microscopy-based motion analysis , 2001, Current Biology.

[19]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Chromosome-microtubule interactions during mitosis. , 2002, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[20]  E. Salmon,et al.  Studies on the ejection properties of asters: astral microtubule turnover influences the oscillatory behavior and positioning of mono-oriented chromosomes. , 1991, Journal of cell science.

[21]  D. Mastronarde,et al.  Interpolar spindle microtubules in PTK cells , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  G. Mourou,et al.  Corneal refractive surgery with femtosecond lasers , 1999 .

[23]  R. Nicklas,et al.  CHROMOSOME VELOCITY DURING MITOSIS AS A FUNCTION OF CHROMOSOME SIZE AND POSITION , 1965, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  G. Borisy,et al.  Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and the metaphase-anaphase transition , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  A Khodjakov,et al.  Kinetochores moving away from their associated pole do not exert a significant pushing force on the chromosome , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  Kerry Bloom,et al.  Tension-dependent regulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores can explain metaphase congression in yeast. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[28]  E. Salmon,et al.  Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[29]  G. Östergren CONSIDERATIONS ON SOME ELEMENTARY FEATURES OF MITOSIS , 2010 .

[30]  Kevin Ke,et al.  Rapidly prototyped three-dimensional nanofluidic channel networks in glass substrates. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[31]  Adela Ben-Yakar,et al.  Femtosecond laser nanoaxotomy lab-on-a-chip for in vivo nerve regeneration studies , 2008, Nature Methods.

[32]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[33]  E D Salmon,et al.  Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  Y. Melander ACCESSORY CHROMOSOMES IN ANIMALS, ESPECIALLY IN POLYCELIS TENUIS , 2010 .

[35]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Poleward Microtubule Flux in Mitotic Spindles Assembled in Vitro , 2002 .

[36]  E. Salmon,et al.  Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[37]  G. Mourou,et al.  A study of the deterministic character of optical damage by femtosecond laser pulses and applications to nanomachining , 2003 .

[38]  T. Mitchison,et al.  The kinetochore microtubule minus-end disassembly associated with poleward flux produces a force that can do work. , 1996, Molecular biology of the cell.

[39]  E D Salmon,et al.  Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[40]  A. Mogilner,et al.  Model of chromosome motility in Drosophila embryos: adaptation of a general mechanism for rapid mitosis. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[41]  D. Compton,et al.  The chromokinesin Kid is necessary for chromosome arm orientation and oscillation, but not congression, on mitotic spindles , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.