Noise characteristics of feed forward loops

A prominent feature of gene transcription regulatory networks is the presence in large numbers of motifs, i.e., patterns of interconnection, in the networks. One such motif is the feed forward loop (FFL) consisting of three genes X, Y and Z. The protein product x of X controls the synthesis of protein product y of Y. Proteins x and y jointly regulate the synthesis of z proteins from the gene Z. The FFLs, depending on the nature of the regulating interactions, can be of eight different types which can again be classified into two categories: coherent and incoherent. In this paper, we study the noise characteristics of FFLs using the Langevin formalism and the Monte Carlo simulation technique based on the Gillespie algorithm. We calculate the variances around the mean protein levels in the steady states of the FFLs and find that, in the case of coherent FFLs, the most abundant FFL, namely, the type-1 coherent FFL, is the least noisy. This is shown to be true for all parameter values when the FFLs operate above their thresholds of activation/repression. In the case of incoherent FFLs, no such general conclusion can be shown. The results suggest possible relationships between noise, functionality and abundance.

[1]  M. Holmgren,et al.  Science on the Rise in Developing Countries , 2004, PLoS biology.

[2]  S. Tapscott,et al.  Modeling stochastic gene expression: implications for haploinsufficiency. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Stochastic focusing: fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[5]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[6]  E. Davidson,et al.  Transcriptional regulatory cascades in development: Initial rates, not steady state, determine network kinetics , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. Peccoud,et al.  Markovian Modeling of Gene-Product Synthesis , 1995 .

[8]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Modern Humans Did Not Admix with Neanderthals during Their Range Expansion into Europe , 2004, PLoS biology.

[10]  M. Thattai,et al.  Attenuation of noise in ultrasensitive signaling cascades. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[11]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[12]  M. Thattai,et al.  Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S. Mangan,et al.  Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[15]  D. Gillespie.  A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[16]  Kurt Wiesenfeld,et al.  Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDs , 1995, Nature.

[17]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[18]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[19]  D. Gillespie.  Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[20]  S. Mangan,et al.  The coherent feedforward loop serves as a sign-sensitive delay element in transcription networks. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Indrani Bose,et al.  Motifs in gene transcription regulatory networks , 2005 .

[22]  S. Basu,et al.  Spatiotemporal control of gene expression with pulse-generating networks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  T. Kepler,et al.  Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[24]  C. Rao,et al.  Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise , 2002, Nature.