A Multiple Perspective Product Modeling and Simulation Approach to Engineering Design Support

The competitive market requires better products designed and made in a shorter time with higher quality and lower cost. The speed of launching products onto the market and more importantly the quality of the products become increasingly important factors for a new product to become successful. With rapid advancement in computing power both in terms of hardware capability and software functionalities, product engineering designers are now better equipped to create and make new and novel products than ever before. Engineering designers have so far benefited from computer systems to aid their various design activities. Yet, at the same time, they still feel the inadequacy of these systems in coping with the increasing pressure for them to produce better products in a shorter time. Without committing further expense to develop super-computer design support systems, how the current systems are being best used becomes an important issue and research avenue for investigation. This paper describes an innovative design process model for computer based engineering design through an integrated and coherent use of these CAD systems. The design approach based on the computer multiperspective modeling and evaluation derived from the above design process model can provide comprehensive and integrated design support for various engineering design activities. The pragmatic approach derived in this research promotes the novel use of existing systems in an integrated yet manageable manner. Examples of how these systems have been used are described in the paper to illustrate the benefits.

[1]  Takashi Kiriyama,et al.  Knowledge systematization for a knowledge intensive engineering framework , 1996 .

[2]  Stuart Pugh,et al.  Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering , 1991 .

[3]  Crispin Hales,et al.  Engineering design: a systematic approach , 1989 .

[4]  Jonathan C. Borg,et al.  Guiding component form design using decision consequence knowledge support , 1999, Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf..

[5]  Eskild Tjalve A Short Course in Industrial Design , 1979 .

[6]  Jonathan C. Borg,et al.  Exploring decisions' influence on life-cycle performance to aid “design for Multi-X” , 2000, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[7]  M. Tichem A Design Coordination Approach to Design For X , 1997 .

[8]  Edward Yourdon,et al.  Modern structured analysis , 1989 .

[9]  Fayyaz Rehman,et al.  Proactive Support for Conceptual Design Synthesis of Sheet Metal Components , 2003 .

[10]  Gene F. Franklin,et al.  Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems , 1986 .

[11]  John E. E. Sharpe,et al.  AI System Support for Conceptual Design , 1996 .

[12]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  Knowledge Intensive CAD , 1996, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology.

[13]  W. E. Eder,et al.  Theory of Technical Systems: A Total Concept Theory for Engineering Design , 1988 .

[14]  Michael Joseph French,et al.  Conceptual Design for Engineers , 1985 .

[15]  N. F. M. Roozenburg,et al.  Product design: Fundamentals and methods , 1996 .

[16]  Borut Golob,et al.  A feature-based approach towards an integrated product model including conceptual design information , 2000, Comput. Aided Des..

[17]  Stephen Potter,et al.  Using Domain knowledge to support design requirements elicitation , 2001 .

[18]  Xiu Tan Yan Graphical modelling of modular machines , 1992 .

[19]  Jonathan C. Borg,et al.  Concurrent modelling of components and realization systems to support proactive design for manufacture/assembly , 2001 .

[20]  Sandra MacKenzie Kerr Customised viewpoint support for utilising experiential knowledge in design , 1993 .

[21]  Henry C. Ellis,et al.  Fundamentals of human memory and cognition , 1983 .

[22]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  System Dynamics: A Unified Approach , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.