Predicting to new environments: tools for visualizing model behaviour and impacts on mapped distributions

Data limitations can lead to unrealistic fits of predictive species distribution models (SDMs) and spurious extrapolation to novel environments. Here, we want to draw attention to novel combinations of environmental predictors that are within the sampled range of individual predictors but are nevertheless outside the sample space. These tend to be overlooked when visualizing model behaviour. They may be a cause of differing model transferability and environmental change predictions between methods, a problem described in some studies but generally not well understood. We here use a simple simulated data example to illustrate the problem and provide new and complementary visualization techniques to explore model behaviour and predictions to novel environments. We then apply these in a more complex real-world example. Our results underscore the necessity of scrutinizing model fits, ecological theory and environmental novelty.

[1]  A. Peterson,et al.  Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[2]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[3]  V. Grimm,et al.  Uncertainty in predictions of range dynamics: black grouse climbing the Swiss Alps , 2012 .

[4]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  The art of modelling range‐shifting species , 2010 .

[5]  Basak Guven,et al.  A review and classification of the existing models of cyanobacteria , 2006 .

[6]  W. Thuiller Patterns and uncertainties of species' range shifts under climate change , 2004 .

[7]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Sampling in ecology and evolution – bridging the gap between theory and practice , 2010 .

[8]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invaded ranges matter , 2008, Biology Letters.

[9]  T. Dawson,et al.  Model‐based uncertainty in species range prediction , 2006 .

[10]  John E. Kutzbach,et al.  Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  J. Franklin Moving beyond static species distribution models in support of conservation biogeography , 2010 .

[12]  M. Austin Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches , 2007 .

[13]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Hutchinson's duality: The once and future niche , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  S. Jackson,et al.  Novel climates, no‐analog communities, and ecological surprises , 2007 .

[15]  S. Dobrowski,et al.  Modeling plant ranges over 75 years of climate change in California, USA: temporal transferability and species traits , 2011 .

[16]  S. Lek,et al.  Uncertainty in ensemble forecasting of species distribution , 2010 .

[17]  M. Sykes,et al.  Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change , 2006 .

[18]  W. Hargrove,et al.  The projection of species distribution models and the problem of non-analog climate , 2009, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[19]  D. Gwynne,et al.  Condition Dependence of Male Life Span and Calling Effort in a Field Cricket , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[21]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[22]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[23]  M. Turelli,et al.  Environmental Niche Equivalency versus Conservatism: Quantitative Approaches to Niche Evolution , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  Damaris Zurell,et al.  The virtual ecologist approach: simulating data and observers , 2010 .

[25]  K. Medley Niche shifts during the global invasion of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus Skuse (Culicidae), revealed by reciprocal distribution models , 2010 .

[26]  J. Elith,et al.  Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models , 2009 .

[27]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Effects of restricting environmental range of data to project current and future species distributions , 2004 .

[28]  Jon C. Lovett,et al.  Predicting tree distributions in an East African biodiversity hotspot: model selection, data bias and envelope uncertainty , 2008 .

[29]  C. Ricotta,et al.  Accounting for uncertainty when mapping species distributions: The need for maps of ignorance , 2011 .