Identifying and categorising patient safety hazards in cardiovascular operating rooms using an interdisciplinary approach: a multisite study

Background Cardiac surgery is a complex, high-risk procedure with potential vulnerabilities for patient safety. The evidence base describing safety hazards in the cardiovascular operating room is underdeveloped but is essential to guide future safety improvement efforts. Objective To identify and categorise hazards (anything that has the potential to cause a preventable adverse patient safety event) in the cardiovascular operating room. Methods An interdisciplinary team of researchers used prospective methods, including direct observations, contextual inquiry and photographs to collect hazard data pertaining to the cardiac surgery perioperative period, which started immediately before the patient was transferred to the operating room and ended immediately after patient handoff to the post-anaesthesia/intensive care unit. Data were collected between February and September 2008 in five hospitals. An interdisciplinary approach that included a human factors and systems engineering framework was used to guide the study. Results Twenty cardiac surgeries including the corresponding handoff processes from operating room to post-anaesthesia/intensive care unit were observed. A total of 58 categories of hazards related to care providers (eg, practice variations), tasks (eg, high workload), tools and technologies (eg, poor usability), physical environment (eg, cluttered workspace), organisation (eg, hierarchical culture) and processes (eg, non-compliance with guidelines) were identified. Discussion Hazards in cardiac surgery services are ubiquitous, indicating numerous opportunities to improve safety. Future efforts should focus on creating a stronger culture of safety in the cardiovascular operating room, increasing compliance with evidence-based infection control practices, improving communication and teamwork, and developing a partnership among all stakeholders to improve the design of tools and technologies.

[1]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[2]  Sarah Henrickson Parker,et al.  Improving cardiac surgical care: a work systems approach. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  C A Marrin,et al.  A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1996, JAMA.

[4]  A. Gawande,et al.  The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. , 1999, Surgery.

[5]  Laura C. Bauer,et al.  Cardiac surgery errors: results from the UK National Reporting and Learning System. , 2011, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[6]  Russell L. Stogsdill,et al.  A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1996, JAMA.

[7]  Anita L. Tucker,et al.  Why Hospitals Don't Learn from Failures: Organizational and Psychological Dynamics That Inhibit System Change , 2003 .

[8]  P. Basch Quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. , 2003, New England Journal of Medicine.

[9]  George R. Kim,et al.  The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists' FOCUS Initiative: Locating Errors Through Networked Surveillance (LENS) Project Vision , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  P. Austin,et al.  Relationship Between Preventability of Death After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and All-Cause Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates , 2008, Circulation.

[11]  P. Rebasa,et al.  Continuous Monitoring of Adverse Events: Influence on the Quality of Care and the Incidence of Errors in General Surgery , 2009, World Journal of Surgery.

[12]  Peter Fu-Ming Hu,et al.  User-designed information tools to support communication and care coordination in a trauma hospital , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[13]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[14]  J. Waring,et al.  A culture of safety or coping? Ritualistic behaviours in the operating theatre , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.

[15]  D. Makuc,et al.  Health, United States, 2009; with special feature on medical technology , 2010 .

[16]  C. Landrigan,et al.  Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Douglas A Wiegmann,et al.  Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. , 2007, Surgery.

[18]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[19]  Sanjay Saint,et al.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[20]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Time to accelerate integration of human factors and ergonomics in patient safety , 2011, BMJ quality & safety.

[21]  R. D. McCormick,et al.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2002, Infection control and hospital epidemiology.

[22]  K. Catchpole,et al.  Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations. , 2007, Surgery.

[23]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Exploring performance obstacles of intensive care nurses. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  Daniela Kuhnt,et al.  The Wolf Is Crying in the Operating Room: Patient Monitor and Anesthesia Workstation Alarming Patterns During Cardiac Surgery , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[25]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Using an interdisciplinary approach to identify factors that affect clinicians' compliance with evidence-based guidelines , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[26]  Bonnie J. Wakefield,et al.  Work-arounds in health care settings: Literature review and research agenda , 2008, Health care management review.

[27]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Variation in Local Institutional Review Board Evaluations of a Multicenter Patient Safety Study , 2012, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[28]  T. Guy,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons practice guideline series: Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery, part II: Antibiotic choice. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[29]  Thomas B Sheridan,et al.  Making the Operating Room of the Future Safer , 2006, The American surgeon.

[30]  George R. Kim,et al.  High Stakes and High Risk: A Focused Qualitative Review of Hazards During Cardiac Surgery , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[31]  S. Harrison,et al.  Safety and complexity: inter-departmental relationships as a threat to patient safety in the operating department. , 2013, Journal of health organization and management.

[32]  K. R. Catchpole,et al.  A method for measuring threats and errors in surgery , 2008, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[33]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[34]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Toward Improving Patient Safety Through Voluntary Peer-to-Peer Assessment , 2012, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[35]  P. Pronovost,et al.  An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  P. Carayon,et al.  Sociotechnical systems analysis in health care: a research agenda , 2011, IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering.

[37]  P. Carayon,et al.  Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[38]  J. Reason,et al.  Human factors and cardiac surgery: a multicenter study. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[39]  K. Devers,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. , 2007, Health services research.

[40]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[41]  Michael F. Mangano Evaluation within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General , 1990 .