Replication Study: Melanoma genome sequencing reveals frequent PREX2 mutations

In 2015, as part of the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, we published a Registered Report (Chroscinski et al., 2014) that described how we intended to replicate selected experiments from the paper "Melanoma genome sequencing reveals frequent PREX2 mutations" (Berger et al., 2012). Here we report the results of those experiments. We regenerated cells stably expressing ectopic wild-type and mutant phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate-dependent Rac exchange factor 2 (PREX2) using the same immortalized human NRASG12D melanocytes as the original study. Evaluation of PREX2 expression in these newly generated stable cells revealed varying levels of expression among the PREX2 isoforms, which was also observed in the stable cells made in the original study (Figure S6A; Berger et al., 2012). Additionally, ectopically expressed PREX2 was found to be at least 5 times above endogenous PREX2 expression. The monitoring of tumor formation of these stable cells in vivo resulted in no statistically significant difference in tumor-free survival driven by PREX2 variants, whereas the original study reported that these PREX2 mutations increased the rate of tumor incidence compared to controls (Figure 3B and S6B; Berger et al., 2012). Surprisingly, the median tumor-free survival was 1 week in this replication attempt, while 70% of the control mice were reported to be tumor-free after 9 weeks in the original study. The rapid tumor onset observed in this replication attempt, compared to the original study, makes the detection of accelerated tumor growth in PREX2 expressing NRASG12D melanocytes extremely difficult. Finally, we report meta-analyses for each result. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21634.001

[1]  H. Parkes,et al.  The costs of using unauthenticated, over-passaged cell lines: how much more data do we need? , 2007, BioTechniques.

[2]  T. Errington,et al.  Registered report: Melanoma genome sequencing reveals frequent PREX2 mutations , 2014, eLife.

[3]  J. Wilmott,et al.  DNA methylation and gene deletion analysis of brain metastases in melanoma patients identifies mutually exclusive molecular alterations. , 2014, Neuro-oncology.

[4]  Tim Errington,et al.  Study 44: Replication of Berger et al., 2012 (Nature) , 2013 .

[5]  K. McCoy,et al.  Standardised animal models of host microbial mutualism , 2014, Mucosal Immunology.

[6]  H. Wätzig,et al.  Precision and variance components in quantitative gel electrophoresis , 2005, Electrophoresis.

[7]  P. Hawkins,et al.  Regulation of PTEN inhibition by the pleckstrin homology domain of P-REX2 during insulin signaling and glucose homeostasis , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  R. Bjornson,et al.  Low-copy piggyBac transposon mutagenesis in mice identifies genes driving melanoma , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  C. J. Gordon,et al.  Baseline tumor growth and immune control in laboratory mice are significantly influenced by subthermoneutral housing temperature , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Genetic variability in a frozen batch of MCF-7 cells invisible in routine authentication affecting cell function , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[11]  J. McDougall,et al.  Progression of human papillomavirus type 18-immortalized human keratinocytes to a malignant phenotype. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[13]  L. Fu,et al.  The circadian clock in cancer development and therapy. , 2013, Progress in molecular biology and translational science.

[14]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Genomic Classification of Cutaneous Melanoma , 2015, Cell.

[15]  L. Chin,et al.  Truncating PREX2 mutations activate its GEF activity and alter gene expression regulation in NRAS-mutant melanoma , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  T. Fennell,et al.  Melanoma genome sequencing reveals frequent PREX2 mutations , 2012, Nature.

[17]  Tim Errington,et al.  Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology , 2013 .

[18]  Junfeng Xia,et al.  Cancer Biology and Signal Transduction a Meta-analysis of Somatic Mutations from next Generation Sequencing of 241 Melanomas: a Road Map for the Study of Genes with Potential Clinical Relevance , 2022 .

[19]  E. Schmelz,et al.  Spontaneous malignant transformation of human ovarian surface epithelial cells in vitro. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[20]  Matthew J. Davis,et al.  Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic RAC1 mutations in melanoma , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[21]  F. Sanger,et al.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Udo Albus,et al.  Book Review: Guide for the Care and use of Laboratory Animals , 1998 .

[23]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research , 2014, eLife.

[24]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[25]  J. Kench,et al.  Whole genomes redefine the mutational landscape of pancreatic cancer , 2015, Nature.

[26]  Wolfgang Viechtbauer,et al.  Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package , 2010 .

[27]  A. Sivachenko,et al.  A Landscape of Driver Mutations in Melanoma , 2012, Cell.