Automated Quantification of Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valve Leaflet Angles in CT Images

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is a valuable tool for functional mechanical heart valve (MHV) assessment. An important aspect of bileaflet MHV assessment is evaluation and measurement of leaflet opening and closing angles. Performed manually, however, it is a laborious and time consuming task. In this paper, we propose an automated approach for bileaflet MHV leaflet angle computation. This method consists of four steps. After a one click selection of the MHV region on an axial image, an automatic MHV extraction using thresholding, and a connected component analysis based on voxel intensities is performed. Then, the MHV component (valve ring and two leaflets) positions are identified using random sample consensus and least square fitting. Finally, the angles are automatically computed based on the orientation of the components in each timeframe. Five multiphase CT scans from patients with a bileaflet MHV containing between 14 and 17 timepoints were used for development and another 15 were used for evaluation. The detected MHV components were scored for their overlap with real components as successful or unsuccessful. For successful results, the angles were compared to those measured by a radiologist. Qualitatively evaluated on a data set of 222 images, a total of 398 out of 444 angle computations (89.6%) were rated as successful. Compared to the angles measured by the radiologist, the successful angles showed a mean difference of 0.54° ± 3.63° from the manual calculations. The method provides a high success rate and an accurate computation of leaflet opening angles compared to manual measurements.

[1]  A. Ducci,et al.  Possible Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[3]  Tim Leiner,et al.  Artifact reduction strategies for prosthetic heart valve CT imaging , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[4]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Early Aortic Transcatheter Heart Valve Thrombosis: Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Multidetector Computed Tomography , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  W. Mali,et al.  Baseline MDCT findings after prosthetic heart valve implantation provide important complementary information to echocardiography for follow-up purposes , 2015, European Radiology.

[6]  M. Prokop,et al.  Multidetector-row computed tomography imaging characteristics of mechanical prosthetic valves. , 2011, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[7]  M. Prokop,et al.  Multidetector CT imaging of mechanical prosthetic heart valves: quantification of artifacts with a pulsatile in-vitro model , 2011, European Radiology.

[8]  J. Zamorano,et al.  Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the Inter-American Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging. , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[9]  H. Lee,et al.  Assessment of Mitral Paravalvular Leakage After Mitral Valve Replacement Using Cardiac Computed Tomography: Comparison With Surgical Findings. , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[10]  Y. Eshet,et al.  The role of ECG-gated MDCT in the evaluation of aortic and mitral mechanical valves: initial experience. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  H. Mohammadi,et al.  Prosthetic Aortic Heart Valves , 2017 .

[12]  Marguerite E. Faure,et al.  Advanced CT acquisition protocol with a third-generation dual-source CT scanner and iterative reconstruction technique for comprehensive prosthetic heart valve assessment , 2017, European Radiology.

[13]  E. Kazerooni,et al.  Evaluation of mechanical heart valve size and function with ECG-gated 64-MDCT. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest , 1995 .

[15]  W. Mali,et al.  Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction , 2011, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[16]  Tim Leiner,et al.  Multimodality Imaging Assessment of Prosthetic Heart Valves , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[17]  Hadi Mohammadi,et al.  Prosthetic aortic heart valves: modeling and design. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[18]  Gloria Tamborini,et al.  Three-dimensional dynamic assessment of tricuspid and mitral annuli using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2013, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[19]  Viktor K. Prasanna,et al.  Parallel Architectures and Algorithms for Image Component Labeling , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .

[21]  R. Budde,et al.  Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Allows Accurate Measurement of Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve Leaflet Closing Angles Compared With Fluoroscopy , 2014, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  M. Prokop,et al.  Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  Yizong Cheng,et al.  Mean Shift, Mode Seeking, and Clustering , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[24]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Emerging Trends in Heart Valve Engineering: Part II. Novel and Standard Technologies for Aortic Valve Replacement , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  J. Dodd,et al.  Practical tips and tricks for assessing prosthetic valves and detecting paravalvular regurgitation using cardiac CT. , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[26]  Craig M. Shakarji,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting Algorithms of the NIST Algorithm Testing System , 1998, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.