A model based approach for identifying robust operating conditions for industrial chromatography with process variability

A model based approach has been developed and used to identify robust operating conditions for an industrial hydrophobic interaction chromatography where resin lot variability, combined with feed stream variability, was resulting in serious performance issues during the purification of a multi component therapeutic protein from crude feed material. An equilibrium dispersive model was formulated which successfully predicted the key product critical quality attribute during validation studies. The model was then used to identify operating parameter ranges that assured product quality despite the process variability. Probabilistic design spaces were generated using stochastic simulations that showed the probability that each resin lot would meet product quality specifications, over a range of possible operating conditions, accounting for the historical variability experienced in the load material composition and concentration. No operating condition was found with normal process variability where quality assurance remained >0.95 for resins that gave the highest and lowest product recoveries during process development. The lowest risk of batch failure found was 16%, and operating conditions were not robust. We then extended the stochastic methodology used to generate probabilistic design spaces, to identify the level of control required on the load material composition and concentration to bring process robustness to an acceptable level, which is not possible using DOE experimental methods due to the impractical amount of resources that would be required. Although reducing inlet variability resulted in an increase in the assurance of product quality, the results indicated that changing operating conditions according to which resin lot is in use is the favorable option.

[1]  Karin Westerberg,et al.  Model‐Based Process Challenge of an Industrial Ion‐Exchange Chromatography Step , 2012 .

[2]  B. Kelley,et al.  High-throughput screening of chromatographic separations: I. Method development and column modeling. , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  Jørgen Mollerup,et al.  A review of the thermodynamics of protein association to ligands, protein adsorption, and adsorption isotherms , 2008 .

[4]  Eva Sorensen,et al.  Modelling of industrial biopharmaceutical multicomponent chromatography , 2014 .

[5]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Preparative weak cation-exchange chromatography of monoclonal antibody variants I. Single-component adsorption. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. A.

[6]  Steven M. Cramer,et al.  Steric mass‐action ion exchange: Displacement profiles and induced salt gradients , 1992 .

[7]  Guido Zacchi,et al.  Using computer simulation to assist in the robustness analysis of an ion-exchange chromatography step. , 2005, Journal of chromatography. A.

[8]  Anurag S Rathore,et al.  Roadmap for implementation of quality by design (QbD) for biotechnology products. , 2009, Trends in biotechnology.

[9]  Marcel Ottens,et al.  Model-based rational methodology for protein purification process synthesis , 2013 .

[10]  Steven M Cramer,et al.  Characterization and modeling of nonlinear hydrophobic interaction chromatographic systems. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  Arne Staby,et al.  Development, modelling, optimisation and scale-up of chromatographic purification of a therapeutic protein , 2007 .

[12]  Bernt Nilsson,et al.  Effects of uncertainties in experimental conditions on the estimation of adsorption model parameters in preparative chromatography , 2013, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[13]  Marcus Degerman,et al.  Determining Critical Process Parameters and Process Robustness in Preparative Chromatography - A Model-Based Approach , 2009 .

[14]  Sanchayita Ghose,et al.  Defining process design space for a hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) purification step: Application of quality by design (QbD) principles , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  Daniel G Bracewell,et al.  Integration of scale-down experimentation and general rate modelling to predict manufacturing scale chromatographic separations. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[16]  Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Experimental determination of single solute and competitive adsorption isotherms. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[17]  A. Rathore,et al.  Quality by design for biopharmaceuticals , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Jörg Thömmes,et al.  Modeling of protein monomer/aggregate purification and separation using hydrophobic interaction chromatography , 2008, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[19]  Wei-Han Liu,et al.  Application of a two-dimensional model for predicting the pressure-flow and compression properties during column packing scale-up. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[20]  Marcus Degerman,et al.  Modeling and optimization of preparative reversed-phase liquid chromatography for insulin purification. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[21]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Model-based design space determination of peptide chromatographic purification processes. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[22]  Marcus Degerman,et al.  Optimisation and robustness analysis of a hydrophobic interaction chromatography step. , 2005, Journal of chromatography. A.

[23]  Xiangyang Wang,et al.  Defining Process Design Space for Biotech Products: Case Study of Pichia pastoris Fermentation , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[24]  Jürgen Hubbuch,et al.  Model-integrated process development demonstrated on the optimization of a robotic cation exchange step , 2012 .

[25]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Model-based design of peptide chromatographic purification processes. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[26]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Comparative modeling of breakthrough curves of bovine serum albumin in anion-exchange chromatography. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[27]  Daniel G Bracewell,et al.  Design of high productivity antibody capture by protein A chromatography using an integrated experimental and modeling approach. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.