Task- and location-switching effects on visual attention

In two experiments, we examined the effects of task and location switching on the accuracy of reporting target characters in an attentional blink (AB) paradigm. Single-character streams were presented at a rate of 100 msec per character in Experiment 1, and successive pairs of characters on either side of fixation were presented in Experiment 2. On each trial, two targets appeared that were either white letters or black digits embedded in a stream of black letter distractors, and they were separated by between zero and five items in the stream (lags 1-6). Experiment 1 showed that report of the first target was least accurate if it immediately preceded the second target and if the two targets were either both letters or both digits (task repetition cost). Report of the second target was least accurate if one or two distractors intervened between the two targets (the U-shapedAB lag effect) and if one target was a letter and the other a digit (task switch cost). Experiment 2 added location uncertainty as a factor and showed similar effects as Experiment 1, with one exception. Lag 1 sparing (the preserved accuracy in reporting the second of two targets if the second immediately follows the first) was completely eliminated when the task required attention switching across locations. Two-way additive effects were found between task switching and location switching in the AB paradigm. These results suggests separate loci for their attentional effects. It is likely that the AB deficit is due mainly to central memory limitations, whereas location-switching costs occur at early visual levels. Task-switching costs occur at an intermediate visual level, since the present task switch involved encoding differences without changes in stimulus-response mapping rules (i.e., the task was character identification for both letters and digits).

[1]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[2]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[3]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[6]  M. Turvey On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. , 1973, Psychological review.

[7]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation , 1976 .

[8]  S. Shih Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  James T. Enns,et al.  Target detection and localization in visual search: A dual systems perspective , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Erik M. Altmann,et al.  Tasks of a feather flock together: Similarity effects in task switching , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Augustinus H. J. Oomes,et al.  Erratum to: The beholder’s share in the perception of orientation of 2-D shapes. , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  James T. Enns,et al.  Task switching mediates the attentional blink even without backward masking , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains : Evidence from the attentional blink , 1999 .

[14]  James T. Enns,et al.  Visual masking and task switching in the attentional blink , 2001 .

[15]  John Holmgren Visual search with imperfect recognition , 1968 .

[16]  Alan Allport,et al.  Task-switching: using RSVP methods to study an experimenter-cued shift of set , 2001 .

[17]  M C Potter,et al.  Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Karen M. Arnell,et al.  Cross-modal interactions in dual-task paradigms , 2001 .

[20]  M. Suero,et al.  A model of the formation of illusory conjunctions in the time domain. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The attentional blink in space and time , 2002, Vision Research.

[22]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Residual costs in task switching: Testing the failure-to-engage hypothesis , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[24]  Roberto Dell'Acqua,et al.  The attentional blink bottleneck , 2001 .

[25]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption , 1989 .

[26]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Perceptual and Central Interference in Dual-Task Performance , 2001 .

[27]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? , 1994 .

[28]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[29]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[30]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  J. Juola,et al.  Priming effects in attentional gating , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[32]  G. Sperling,et al.  Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. , 1995 .

[33]  D. Broadbent,et al.  From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  V. Lollo,et al.  Low-level masking in the attentional blink , 1997 .

[35]  J. Juola,et al.  Evidence for Distinct Attentional Bottlenecks in Attention Switching and Attentional Blink Tasks , 2000, The Journal of general psychology.

[36]  R. Klein,et al.  Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Catherine M Arrington,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article The Cost of a Voluntary Task Switch , 2022 .

[38]  N. Meiran Modeling cognitive control in task-switching , 2000, Psychological research.

[39]  J. Juola,et al.  Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  K. Shapiro,et al.  The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple rapid serial visual presentation items: tests of an interference model. , 1999 .