Using Data-Collection Devices To Enhance Students' Understanding.

Students typically walked in a path that resembled the shape of the original graph hile working with high school students at a Mathe matics, Physics, and Advanced Technology Explo ration Day, we observed an activity in which stu dents tried to reproduce a distance-time graph by walking. They used a Calculator-Based Ranger (CBR) to collect data about their distance from a motion detector and to generate a distance-time graph in real time. During the activity, the students clearly did not understand the distance information that the given graph was conveying. See figure 1. Instead of moving back and forth along a straight Une to produce a graph that matched the distance time information given, students typically walked in a path that resembled the shape of the original

[1]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Functions, Graphs, and Graphing: Tasks, Learning, and Teaching , 1990 .

[2]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics , 1987 .

[3]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[4]  Earl R. Glenn,et al.  National association for research in science teaching: National association for research in science teaching , 1929 .

[5]  M. Linn,et al.  Evaluations of Science Laboratory Data: The Role of Computer-Presented Information , 1987 .

[6]  Patricia L. Hale Building conceptions and repairing misconceptions in student understanding of kinematic graphs : using student discourse in calculator based laboratories , 1996 .

[7]  Priscilla W. Laws Workshop Physics. FIPSE Final Report. , 1989 .

[8]  Ricardo Nemirovsky,et al.  Body Motion and Graphing , 1998 .

[9]  John J. Clement,et al.  The Concept of Variation and Misconceptions in Cartesian Graphing. , 1989 .

[10]  Heather Brasell,et al.  The effect of real‐time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity , 1987 .

[11]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Interdomain Transfer Between Isomorphic Topics in Algebra and Physics , 1989 .

[12]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Learning motion concepts using real‐time microcomputer‐based laboratory tools , 1990 .

[13]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students' understanding of acid, base, and ph concepts , 1994 .

[14]  Fred M. Goldberg,et al.  Student difficulties with graphical representations of negative values of velocity , 1989 .

[15]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  THE EFFECT OF SIMULTANEOUS MOTION PRESENTATION AND GRAPH GENERATION IN A KINEMATICS LAB , 1990 .

[16]  Suzanne K. Damarin,et al.  A nine month study of graph construction skills and reasoning strategies used by ninth grade students to construct graphs of science data by hand and with computer graphing software , 1988 .

[17]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[18]  J. Bruner Toward a Theory of Instruction , 1966 .

[19]  Alan R. Osborne,et al.  Learning How to See: Students Graphing Difficulties. , 1991 .

[20]  Marcia C Linn Perspectives for research in science teaching: using the computer as laboratoy partner , 1990 .

[21]  Janice R. Mokros,et al.  The Impact of Microcomputer-Based Science Labs on Children's Graphing Skills. , 1985 .

[22]  Michael T. Svec,et al.  Effect of Micro-Computer Based Laboratory on Graphing Interpretation Skills and Understanding of Motion. , 1995 .