Promoting acceptance of direct load control programs in the United States: Financial incentive versus control option

Abstract Residential direct load control (DLC) is an important type of demand response designed to reduce electricity consumption during peak hours through utility companies' control over the operation of certain household appliances. Despite many benefits of DLC, customers' concern for losing control has been hindering its adoption. This study aims to investigate U.S. residents' willingness to accept two popular A/C-related DLC programs in summertime with or without financial incentives or an override option, and to identify the socio-demographic characteristics associated with the decisions. Results of an online survey among 1482 U.S. residents indicate half of the participants are willing to accept DLC without any conditions; however, both an incentive of $30 and an override option boost acceptance rates. Importantly, the override option is more effective than the financial incentive. Residents who are younger, Democrats, non-Whites, have higher education levels, live in larger dwellings, and live with more people are more likely to adopt DLC than their counterparts. Residents who are older, Republicans, Whites, homeowners, and live in a house preferred an override option to financial incentives more often. The implications were discussed in terms of improving power system stability through better DLC program design and implementation.

[1]  E. Hobman,et al.  Willingness to participate in direct load control: The role of consumer distrust , 2017 .

[2]  Marcel Schweiker,et al.  Thermo-specific self-efficacy (specSE) in relation to perceived comfort and control , 2016 .

[3]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Diversity: Energy studies need social science , 2014, Nature.

[4]  E. Borrayo,et al.  Feeling frugal: socioeconomic status, acculturation, and cultural health beliefs among women of Mexican descent. , 2003, Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology.

[5]  Carmen DeNavas-Walt,et al.  Income and Poverty in the United States: 2013 , 2014 .

[6]  Guy R. Newsham,et al.  The effect of utility time-varying pricing and load control strategies on residential summer peak electricity use: A review , 2010 .

[7]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  Feedback on Household Electricity Consumption: Learning and Social Influence Processes , 2011 .

[8]  R. Rajagopal,et al.  Determinants of residential electricity consumption: Using smart meter data to examine the effect of climate, building characteristics, appliance stock, and occupants' behavior , 2013 .

[9]  Johan Martinsson,et al.  Energy saving in Swedish households. The (relative) importance of environmental attitudes , 2011 .

[10]  Mohammed H. Albadi,et al.  A summary of demand response in electricity markets , 2008 .

[11]  W. Fichtner,et al.  Electricity load profiles in Europe: The importance of household segmentation , 2014 .

[12]  Fangxing Li,et al.  A Framework of Residential Demand Aggregation With Financial Incentives , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  D. Shipworth,et al.  Are consumers willing to switch to smart time of use electricity tariffs? The importance of loss-aversion and electric vehicle ownership , 2017 .

[14]  D. Hess.  Smart meters and public acceptance: comparative analysis and governance implications , 2014 .

[15]  Hans Christian Gils,et al.  Assessment of the theoretical demand response potential in Europe , 2014 .

[16]  Gail Brager,et al.  Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55 , 2002 .

[17]  Ran Li,et al.  Cross-domain feature selection and coding for household energy behavior , 2016 .

[18]  Jay Zarnikau,et al.  Consumer demand for ‘green power’ and energy efficiency , 2003 .

[19]  Runa Tabea Hellwig,et al.  Perceived control in indoor environments: a conceptual approach , 2015 .

[20]  Ian Richardson,et al.  Smart meter data: Balancing consumer privacy concerns with legitimate applications , 2012 .

[21]  Fangxing Li,et al.  An approach to assess the responsive residential demand to financial incentives , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[22]  L. Whitmarsh,et al.  Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes , 2013 .

[23]  A. McCright,et al.  Politics shapes individual choices about energy efficiency , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Laura M. Arpan,et al.  Between the technology acceptance model and sustainable energy technology acceptance model: Investigating smart meter acceptance in the United States , 2017 .

[25]  James B. Allen,et al.  Environmental Locus of Control, Sympathy, and Proenvironmental Behavior , 1999 .

[26]  John Marumbwa,et al.  Exploring the Moderating Effects of Socio-Demographic Variables on Consumer Acceptance and Use of Mobile Money Transfer Services (MMTs) in Southern Zimbabwe , 2014 .

[27]  Julia K. Day,et al.  Thermal comfort or money saving? Exploring intentions to conserve energy among low-income households in the United States , 2017 .

[28]  B. Frey,et al.  The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out , 1997 .

[29]  D. Messick,et al.  Sanctioning Systems, Decision Frames, and Cooperation , 1999 .

[30]  L. Steg,et al.  Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework , 2012 .

[31]  Michael J. Fell,et al.  Knowing me, knowing you: the role of trust, locus of control and privacy concern in acceptance of domestic electricity demand-side response , 2015 .

[32]  Gesche M. Huebner,et al.  Public acceptability of domestic demand-side response in Great Britain: The role of automation and direct load control , 2015 .

[33]  Michel Laroche,et al.  Pro-Environmental Behaviors for Thee But Not for Me: Green Giants, Green Gods, and External Environmental Locus of Control , 2014 .

[34]  Michael J. Fell.  Taking charge: perceived control and acceptability of domestic demand-side response , 2016 .

[35]  Johanna L. Mathieu.  Modeling, Analysis, and Control of Demand Response Resources , 2012 .

[36]  S. Bamberg.  How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question , 2003 .

[37]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world. , 2015, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  Hal G. Gueutal,et al.  A Field Experiment Comparing Information-Privacy Values, Beliefs, and Attitudes Across Several Types of Organizations , 1983 .

[39]  Julia V. Gallenkamp,et al.  Exploring the Role of Control - Smart Meter Acceptance of Residential Consumers , 2010, AMCIS.

[40]  Christine Horne,et al.  Privacy, technology, and norms: the case of Smart Meters. , 2015, Social science research.

[41]  W. Abrahamse,et al.  Factors Related to Household Energy Use and Intention to Reduce It : The Role of Psychological and Socio-Demographic Variables , 2011 .

[42]  L. Steg,et al.  Individual differences in values determine the relative persuasiveness of biospheric, economic and combined appeals. , 2017 .

[43]  Denise A. Guerin,et al.  Occupant Predictors of Household Energy Behavior and Consumption Change as Found in Energy Studies Since 1975 , 2000 .

[44]  W. Abrahamse,et al.  How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households' direct and indirect energy use and savings? , 2009 .

[45]  E. Skinner.  A guide to constructs of control. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory of self-regulation☆ , 1991 .

[47]  L. Calderwood,et al.  Socio-demographic characteristics , 2003 .

[48]  Mglc Marcel Loomans,et al.  Impact of available and perceived control on comfort and health in European offices , 2013 .