Metacognition, Need for Cognition and Use of Explanations during Ongoing Learning and Problem Solving.

Abstract Two studies assessed whether: (1) high levels of task-relevant metacognition would be related to good task performance; (2) some kinds of feedback (e.g., explanations) would improve task-relevant metacognition (and hence, performance) more than other kinds of feedback; and (3) some kinds of people would be more likely to seek out and use this beneficial feedback than others. Results showed that: (1) students were able to better estimate their task performance with increasing experience at the task; (2) students who provided better estimates of their task success were more successful at the task; (3) students high in need for cognition sought out problem explanations more often than students low in need for cognition; but (4) students who scored high in trait metacognition did not seek out problem explanations more often than students who scored low in trait metacognition; (5) students who were high in need for cognition performed better at the task than those who were low in need for cognition, and (6) the receipt of problem explanations was only weakly related to high levels of task performance, if at all. The implications of these results are discussed.

[1]  C. J. Sadowski,et al.  Elaborative Processing Mediates the Relationship Between Need for Cognition and Academic Performance , 1996 .

[2]  Keith W. Thiede,et al.  Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy , 2003 .

[3]  Graduate Record Examinations Board.  GRE, practicing to take the general test , 2003 .

[4]  David Dunning,et al.  How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis , 1982 .

[6]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[7]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[8]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Expertise in Problem Solving. , 1981 .

[9]  M. Just,et al.  The psychology of reading and language comprehension , 1986 .

[10]  S. Tobias,et al.  The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis , 1998 .

[11]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Need for cognition and desire for control as moderators of extrinsic reward effects: a person x situation approach to the study of intrinsic motivation. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .

[13]  E. Stotland,et al.  An experimental investigation of need for cognition. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  Harold F. O'Neil,et al.  Construct validation of a trait self-regulation model , 2001 .

[15]  C. Carver,et al.  Origins and Functions of Positive and Negative Affect: A Control-Process View. , 1990 .

[16]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Kerri L. Johnson,et al.  Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence , 2003 .

[18]  P. Alexander,et al.  Metacognition: Answered and Unanswered Questions , 1989 .

[19]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[20]  Christopher Leone,et al.  Some Effects of the Need for Cognition on Course Grades , 1988 .

[21]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  D. Boud,et al.  Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis , 1989 .

[23]  G. Leak,et al.  Further Validation of the Short Form of the Need for Cognition Scale , 1990 .

[24]  David J. Therriault,et al.  Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. , 2003 .

[25]  C. I. Hovland.  The Order Of Presentation In Persuasion , 1966 .

[26]  C. J. Sadowski,et al.  An Examination of the Short Need for Cognition Scale , 1993 .

[27]  R. Sternberg.  Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .

[28]  Robert Ho,et al.  An Examination of the Short form of the Need for Cognition Scale Applied in an Australian Sample , 1999 .

[29]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  The Effect of Knowledge and Strategy Training on Monitoring Accuracy , 2002 .

[30]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[31]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Does a General Monitoring Skill Exist , 1995 .

[32]  K. R. Olson,et al.  Curiosity and Need for Cognition , 1984 .

[33]  J. Harvey.  Cognition, social behavior, and the environment , 1981 .

[34]  J. Kevin Ford,et al.  LEARNING WITHIN A LEARNER CONTROL TRAINING ENVIRONMENT: THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GOAL ORIENTATION AND METACOGNITIVE INSTRUCTION ON LEARNING OUTCOMES , 2003 .

[35]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Excuses: Masquerades in Search of Grace , 1985 .

[36]  C. Klin,et al.  Knowing that you don't know: metamemory and discourse processing. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  B. Foss.  New Horizons in Psychology 1 , 1966 .