Tracking Multiple Items Through Occlusion: Clues to Visual Objecthood

In three experiments, subjects attempted to track multiple items as they moved independently and unpredictably about a display. Performance was not impaired when the items were briefly (but completely) occluded at various times during their motion, suggesting that occlusion is taken into account when computing enduring perceptual objecthood. Unimpaired performance required the presence of accretion and deletion cues along fixed contours at the occluding boundaries. Performance was impaired when items were present on the visual field at the same times and to the same degrees as in the occlusion conditions, but disappeared and reappeared in ways which did not implicate the presence of occluding surfaces (e.g., by imploding and exploding into and out of existence instead of accreting and deleting along a fixed contour). Unimpaired performance did not require visible occluders (i.e., Michotte's tunnel effect) or globally consistent occluder positions. We discuss implications of these results for theories of objecthood in visual attention.

[1]  A. Michotte,et al.  Les compléments amodaux des structures perceptives , 1964 .

[2]  J. Gibson,et al.  The change from visible to invisible: , 1969 .

[3]  J. Gibson,et al.  The Change from Visible to Invisible: A Study of Optical Transitions* , 1969 .

[4]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[5]  D. Wiggins Sameness and substance , 1980 .

[6]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[8]  W. R. Carter,et al.  The Concept of Identity. , 1984 .

[9]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[11]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  N. Kanwisher Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.

[13]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[15]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Z. Pylyshyn The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.

[17]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[18]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[19]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Amodal presence of partially occluded surfaces: role of invisible stimuli in apparent motion correspondence , 1990 .

[21]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Amodal Representation of Occluded Surfaces: Role of Invisible Stimuli in Apparent Motion Correspondence , 1990, Perception.

[23]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. , 1991, Psychological review.

[25]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  J. Theeuwes Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Objects, Attributes, and Visual Attention: Which, What, and Where , 1992 .

[28]  S. Yantis Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Surfaces versus features in visual search , 1992, Nature.

[30]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[32]  N. Yoshimura,et al.  Identification of transforming growth factor-beta expressed in cultured human retinal pigment epithelial cells. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[33]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  S. Yantis Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture , 1993 .

[35]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[36]  Z. Pylyshyn Some primitive mechanisms of spatial attention , 1994, Cognition.

[37]  Jon Driver,et al.  Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system , 1994, Nature.

[38]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Perceiving textures: Beyond filtering , 1994, Vision Research.

[39]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[40]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception , 1994 .

[41]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Multiple parallel access in visual attention. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[42]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[43]  T. Albright My most true mind thus makes mine eye untrue , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[44]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Neuronal correlates of inferred motion in primate posterior parietal cortex , 1995, Nature.

[45]  S. Yantis Perceived Continuity of Occluded Visual Objects , 1995 .

[46]  Scott N. J. Watamaniuk,et al.  Seeing motion behind occluders , 1995, Nature.

[47]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher level vision , 1995 .

[48]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Seeing Two as One: Linking Apparent Motion and Repetition Blindness , 1997 .

[49]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Searching through subsets: a test of the visual indexing hypothesis. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[50]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[51]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features , 1997, Vision Research.

[52]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  Ennio Mingolla,et al.  ATTENTION IN DEPTH: DISPARITY AND OCCLUSION CUES FACILITATE MULTI-ELEMENT VISUAL TRACKING , 1998 .

[54]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Early completion of occluded objects , 1998, Vision Research.

[55]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Indexing and the object concept: developing `what' and `where' systems , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Multiple-location access in vision: evidence from illusory line motion. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  B. Scholl,et al.  Explaining the infant''s object concept: Beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy , 1999 .

[58]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  Attenuated Change Blindness for Exogenously Attended Items in a Flicker Paradigm , 2000 .

[59]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Multiple object tracking and attentional processing. , 2000, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[60]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.