Information obtained from long-term acoustic recordings: applying bioacoustic techniques for monitoring wetland birds during breeding season

AbstractDigital acoustic recording devices allow for recording of vocal activity of animals over long time periods and therefore open new perspectives for monitoring. In this paper results of a bioacoustic monitoring of birds in a wetland restoration area in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania in Northeastern Germany are presented. Ninety minutes of sound recordings were made daily from March 29 until May 30 2012 using a four-channel recording setup. The recording schedule was mainly designed for nocturnal birds but also included dawn and dusk choruses. By listening to the recordings, supported by spectrographic visualization, 61 bird species could be detected. Despite the fact that most of the recordings were made during the night, no period of absolute silence was detected. The occurrence data allow some conclusions on the state of the bird species, e.g., breeding bird, resting during migration, or guest only. The bioacoustic monitoring revealed the occurrence of rare nocturnal birds such as Little Crake (Porzana parva), Spotted Crake (Porzana porzana) and Short-eared Owl (Asio flammeus). For the Eurasian Bittern (Botaurus stellaris) data on vocal activity and population size could be obtained. The study has shown that automated acoustic recordings can be applied for long-term monitoring of bird populations in remote areas.ZusammenfassungInformationsgehalt akustischer Langzeitaufzeich-nungen: Anwendung bioakustischer Verfahren zum Monitoring von Vögeln in Feuchtgebieten während der Brutzeit Digitale Aufzeichnungsgeräte erlauben, die Lautaktivität von Tieren über lange Zeiträume aufzuzeichnen, und eröffnen damit neue Möglichkeiten für Monitoringaufgaben. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse eines bioakustischen Monitorings von Vögeln in einem Moor-Renaturierungsgebiet in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern erörtert. Vom 29. März bis 30. Mai 2012 wurden mit einem Vierkanalrecorder täglich 90 Minuten aufgezeichnet. Das Aufzeichnungsregime war auf die Erfassung von nachtaktiven Vögeln ausgerichtet, schloss aber das morgendliche und abendliche Vogelkonzert auch mit ein. Durch ein durch spektrographische Visualisierung unterstütztes Abhören der Tonaufzeichnungen wurden insgesamt 61 Vogelarten festgestellt. Ungeachtet des Umstandes, dass die meisten Aufnahmen nachts gemacht wurden, war auf keiner Aufnahme wirkliche Stille zu vernehmen. Die Nachweise auf den Tonaufzeichnungen ermöglichten, den Status der Vogelart einzuschätzen, ob es sich um wahrscheinliche Brutvögel, rastende Tiere oder Nahrungsgäste handelte. Das akustische Monitoring erbrachte Nachweise seltener nachtaktiver Vogelarten wie Kleines Sumpfhuhn (Porzana parva), Tüpfelsumpfhuhn (Porzana porzana) und Sumpfohreule (Asio flammeus). Für die Rohrdommel (Botaurus stellaris) konnten auf akustischem Weg Daten zu Rufaktivität und Bestandsgröße erhoben werden. Die Studie hat gezeigt, dass automatische akustische Aufzeichnungen für ein Monitoring von Vogelpopulationen in schwer zugänglichen Gebieten gut geeignet sind.

[1]  Brenda L. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Modern Music-Playing Devices as Hearing Health Risks , 2007 .

[2]  T. Osiejuk,et al.  Is it possible to acoustically identify individuals within a population? , 2014, Journal of Ornithology.

[3]  Steven J. Schwager,et al.  Acoustic estimation of wildlife abundance: methodology for vocal mammals in forested habitats , 2009 .

[4]  Karl-Heinz Frommolt,et al.  Akustische Mustererkennung von Tierstimmen und deren Nutzung für Monitoringaufgaben im Interesse des Naturschutzes , 2013, GI-Jahrestagung.

[5]  Richard L. Hutto,et al.  Humans versus autonomous recording units: a comparison of point-count results , 2009 .

[6]  E. Nemeth Different singing styles in mated and unmated reed buntings Emberiza schoeniclus , 2008 .

[7]  K. Hobson,et al.  Acoustic surveys of birds using electronic recordings: new potential from an omnidirectional microphone system , 2002 .

[8]  James S. Quinn,et al.  A COMPARISON OF POINT COUNTS AND SOUND RECORDING AS BIRD SURVEY METHODS IN AMAZONIAN SOUTHEAST PERU , 2000 .

[9]  Jill L. Deppe,et al.  Using soundscape recordings to estimate bird species abundance, richness, and composition , 2009 .

[10]  Andreas M. Ali,et al.  Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus , 2011 .

[11]  Dan Stowell,et al.  Automatic large-scale classification of bird sounds is strongly improved by unsupervised feature learning , 2014, PeerJ.

[12]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Comparison of manual and automated methods for identifying target sounds in audio recordings of Pileated, Pale-billed, and putative Ivory-billed woodpeckers , 2009 .

[13]  Mario Lasseck Large-scale Identification of Birds in Audio Recordings , 2014, CLEF.

[14]  Philipp Schaer,et al.  Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction , 2017, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[15]  Neil D. Burgess,et al.  Bird Census Techniques , 1992 .

[16]  Paul Roe,et al.  A toolbox for animal call recognition , 2012 .

[17]  Karl-Heinz Frommolt,et al.  Applying bioacoustic methods for long-term monitoring of a nocturnal wetland bird , 2014, Ecol. Informatics.

[18]  Adrian C. Newton,et al.  Bird Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques , 2004 .

[19]  Paul Roe,et al.  Sampling environmental acoustic recordings to determine bird species richness. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[20]  Murray G. Efford,et al.  Bird population density estimated from acoustic signals , 2009 .

[21]  Frank Kurth,et al.  Detecting bird sounds in a complex acoustic environment and application to bioacoustic monitoring , 2010, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[22]  T. Mitchell Aide,et al.  Calling Activity of the Common Tink Frog (Diasporus Diastema) (Eleutherodactylidae) in Secondary Forests of the Caribbean of Costa Rica , 2012 .

[23]  George Holborn,et al.  Evaluation of an automated recording device for monitoring forest birds , 2012 .

[24]  H. Lampe,et al.  VARIATIONS IN THE SONG OF THE PIED FLYCATCHER WITHIN AND BETWEEN BREEDING SEASONS , 1993 .

[25]  P. Slater,et al.  Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations , 1995 .

[26]  P. McGregor,et al.  The role of vocal individuality in conservation , 2005, Frontiers in Zoology.

[27]  Luis J. Villanueva-Rivera,et al.  Using Automated Digital Recording Systems as Effective Tools for the Monitoring of Birds and Amphibians , 2006 .

[28]  A. Farnsworth,et al.  A comparison of nocturnal call counts of migrating birds and reflectivity measurements on Doppler radar , 2004 .

[29]  Stephen T. Buckland,et al.  POINT-TRANSECT SURVEYS FOR SONGBIRDS: ROBUST METHODOLOGIES , 2006 .

[30]  O. Hüppop,et al.  Flight call rates of migrating thrushes: effects of wind conditions, humidity and time of day at an illuminated offshore platform , 2012 .

[31]  T. Aide,et al.  Recovery of amphibian species richness and composition in a chronosequence of secondary forests, northeastern Costa Rica , 2012 .

[32]  Kurt M. Fristrup,et al.  Bioacoustical Monitoring in Terrestrial Environments , 2012 .

[33]  Len Thomas,et al.  Passive acoustic monitoring of beaked whale densities in the Gulf of Mexico , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Richard D. Gregory,et al.  Bird census and survey techniques , 2004 .

[35]  R. Graber,et al.  An Audio Technique for the Study of Nocturnal Migration of Birds , 1959 .