Finite element model updating of semi-composite bridge decks using operational acceleration measurements

Abstract Composite bridge decks provide higher flexural moment capacity and stiffness compared to their non-composite counterparts. In order to achieve composite behavior, differential slip between the steel member and the concrete slab must be restrained by means of shear connectors. In older bridge decks composite behavior is uncertain. Uncertainty arises, among other things, due to lack of knowledge regarding the type of shear connector used (if any), cumulative damage due to fatigue, and aging effects. In this paper the authors propose the use of sensitivity-based finite element model updating to determine the degree of composite behavior of operational bridge decks with uncertain shear connectors. The free parameters of the models are: rigidity per unit length of the beam-slab interface and the elastic modulus of the concrete slab. The features used in the model updating procedure are the identified modal frequencies from operational acceleration measurements. A sequential sensitivity-based weighted least-squares solution was implemented. The proposed methodology is verified in various simulated bridge deck structures and validated in an operational and partially instrumented bridge deck with uncertain composite action.

[1]  Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.  Load Distribution and Impact Factors for I-Girder Bridges , 1997 .

[2]  J. Juang Applied system identification , 1994 .

[3]  Michael D. Engelhardt,et al.  Strengthening Bridges by Developing Composite Action in Existing Non-Composite Bridge Girders , 2009 .

[4]  Antonino Morassi,et al.  A Damage Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Beams Via Dynamic Methods: Part I. Experimental Results , 2003 .

[5]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial (vol 25, pg 2275, 2010) , 2011 .

[6]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Erratum to “The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial” [Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 25(7) (2010) 2275–2296] , 2018 .

[7]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[8]  Andrea Dall'Asta,et al.  Composite beams with weak shear connection , 2001 .

[9]  Scott A. Civjan,et al.  Evaluation of a Noncomposite Steel Girder Bridge through Live-Load Field Testing , 2013 .

[10]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Analysis of composite beams with partial shear interaction using available modelling techniques: A comparative study , 2006 .

[11]  Sharon L. Wood,et al.  FIELD EVALUATION OF DECOMMISSIONED NONCOMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER BRIDGE , 2002 .

[12]  N. M. Newmark,et al.  Test and analysis of composite beams with incomplete interaction , 1951 .

[13]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  A Rational Model for the Degree of Interaction in Composite Beams with Flexible Shear Connectors , 1998 .

[14]  Ulf Arne Girhammar,et al.  Dynamic analysis of composite members with interlayer slip , 1993 .

[15]  Boris A. Zárate,et al.  Finite element model updating: Multiple alternatives , 2008 .

[16]  Bryan E. Little,et al.  American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Highway Drainage Guidelines American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications , 2000 .

[17]  R. Fox,et al.  Rates of change of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. , 1968 .

[18]  John T. DeWolf,et al.  Development and Implementation of a Continuous Strain Monitoring System on a Multi-Girder Composite Steel Bridge , 2006 .

[19]  Deric J. Oehlers,et al.  Composite Beams with Limited-Slip-Capacity Shear Connectors , 1995 .