Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences in Dynamic Stereotypes: A Comparison Between Germany and the United States

This study examined cross-cultural similarities and differences in beliefs about men and women of the past, present, and future. These dynamic stereotypes, or beliefs that a group's present characteristics differ from its past or future characteristics, correspond to the actual role change experienced by the group (Diekman & Eagly, 2000). Participants in Germany and the United States perceived that women were increasing in their masculine characteristics from the past to the future, whereas they perceived comparatively more stability in men's characteristics. The largest cross-cultural difference stemmed from beliefs about 1950s women, who were perceived as possessing greater positive masculine personality, negative feminine personality, and less feminine physical traits in Germany than in the United States. This greater nontraditionalism of postwar German women reflects their assumption of stereotypically male-dominated roles immediately after World War II. Consistent with social role theory, perceived role nontraditionalism mediated the relationship between time period and levels of gender-stereotypic characteristics.

[1]  A. Diekman,et al.  Dynamic Stereotypes of Power: Perceived Change and Stability in Gender Hierarchies , 2004 .

[2]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Focused Tests of Significance and Effect Size Estimation in Counseling Psychology. , 1988 .

[3]  A. Kuhn Power and Powerlessness: Women after 1945, or the Continuity of the Ideology of Femininity , 1989 .

[4]  P. England Toward gender equality: Progress and bottlenecks , 2006 .

[5]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  Psychological androgyny and sex role flexibility: A test of two hypotheses , 1979 .

[6]  R L Helmreich,et al.  Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  A. Eagly,et al.  Stereotypes as Dynamic Constructs: Women and Men of the Past, Present, and Future , 2000 .

[8]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  If You Can't Join Them, Beat Them: Effects of Social Exclusion on Aggressive Behavior , 2001 .

[9]  M. Fulbrook History of Germany, 1918-2000 : the divided nation , 2002 .

[10]  A. Eagly,et al.  Dynamic Stereotypes about Women and Men in Latin America and the United States , 2005 .

[11]  D. Best,et al.  Measuring Sex Stereotypes: A Multination Study , 1982 .

[12]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[13]  B. Reskin,et al.  Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations , 1990 .

[14]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender-Stereotypic Images of Occupations Correspond to the Sex Segregation of Employment , 1999 .

[16]  J. Twenge Changes in women's assertiveness in response to status and roles: a cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931-1993. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Robert C. Satterwhite,et al.  Pancultural Gender Stereotypes Revisited: The Five Factor Model , 1999 .

[18]  H. Hayghe Rise in Mothers' Labor Force Activity Includes Those with Infants , 1986 .

[19]  A. Schröter,et al.  Väter und Erziehungsurlaub , 1996 .

[20]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 2005, Technometrics.