Visual Responses in FEF, Unlike V1, Primarily Reflect When the Visual Context Renders a Receptive Field Salient

When light falls within a neuronal visual receptive field (RF) the resulting activity is referred to as the visual response. Recent work suggests this activity is in response to both the visual stimulation and the abrupt appearance, or salience, of the presentation. Here we present a novel method for distinguishing the two, based on the timing of random and nonrandom presentations. We examined these contributions in frontal eye field (FEF; N = 51) and as a comparison, an early stage in the primary visual cortex (V1; N = 15) of male monkeys (Macaca mulatta). An array of identical stimuli was presented within and outside the neuronal RF while we manipulated salience by varying the time between stimulus presentations. We hypothesized that the rapid presentation would reduce salience (the sudden appearance within the visual field) of a stimulus at any one location, and thus decrease responses driven by salience in the RF. We found that when the interstimulus interval decreased from 500 to 16 ms there was an approximate 79% reduction in the FEF response compared with an estimated 17% decrease in V1. This reduction in FEF response for rapid presentation was evident even when the random sequence preceding a stimulus did not stimulate the RF for 500 ms. The time course of these response changes in FEF suggest that salience is represented much earlier (<100 ms following stimulus onset) than previously estimated. Our results suggest that the contribution of salience dominates at higher levels of the visual system. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The neuronal responses in early visual processing [e.g., primary visual cortex (V1)] reflect primarily the retinal stimulus. Processing in higher visual areas is modulated by a combination of the visual stimulation and contextual factors, such as salience, but identifying these components separately has been difficult. Here we quantified these contributions at a late stage of visual processing [frontal eye field (FEF)] and as a comparison, an early stage in V1. Our results suggest that as visual information continues through higher levels of processing the neural responses are no longer driven primarily by the visual stimulus in the receptive field, but by the broader context that stimulus defines—very different from current views about visual signals in FEF.

[1]  Thomas Serre,et al.  Object decoding with attention in inferior temporal cortex , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Composition and topographic organization of signals sent from the frontal eye field to the superior colliculus. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Attention Modulates Contextual Influences in the Primary Visual Cortex of Alert Monkeys , 1999, Neuron.

[4]  B. C. Motter.  Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Robert H. Wurtz,et al.  Influence of the thalamus on spatial visual processing in frontal cortex , 2006, Nature.

[8]  Robert H Wurtz,et al.  Saccadic Corollary Discharge Underlies Stable Visual Perception , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Jacqueline Gottlieb,et al.  The lateral intraparietal area as a salience map: the representation of abrupt onset, stimulus motion, and task relevance , 2000, Vision Research.

[11]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[12]  L. Zhaoping,et al.  Modulation of Neuronal Responses by Exogenous Attention in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Marc A Sommer,et al.  Neuronal adaptation caused by sequential visual stimulation in the frontal eye field. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Wenyaw Chan,et al.  Statistical Methods in Medical Research , 2013, Model. Assist. Stat. Appl..

[15]  Etienne Olivier,et al.  Salience Representation in the Parietal and Frontal Cortex , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Lance M. Optican,et al.  Unix-based multiple-process system, for real-time data acquisition and control , 1982 .

[17]  Jeffrey D Schall,et al.  The neural selection and control of saccades by the frontal eye field. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Frontal eye field activity before visual search errors reveals the integration of bottom-up and top-down salience. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  C. Bruce,et al.  Primate frontal eye fields. II. Physiological and anatomical correlates of electrically evoked eye movements. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  S. Petersen,et al.  The pulvinar and visual salience , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  J. Bullier,et al.  Topography of visual cortex connections with frontal eye field in macaque: convergence and segregation of processing streams , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  J D Schall,et al.  Dynamic dissociation of visual selection from saccade programming in frontal eye field. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Saccades, salience and attention: the role of the lateral intraparietal area in visual behavior. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[25]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Dissociation of visual discrimination from saccade programming in macaque frontal eye field. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  J. Bisley,et al.  A pure salience response in posterior parietal cortex. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Nicholas A. Steinmetz,et al.  Visual Space is Compressed in Prefrontal Cortex Before Eye Movements , 2014, Nature.

[28]  R. Desimone,et al.  A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  R. Reid,et al.  Attention Modulates the Responses of Simple Cells in Monkey Primary Visual Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Robert H Wurtz,et al.  Modulation of shifting receptive field activity in frontal eye field by visual salience. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Ryan C Kelly,et al.  Dynamics of response to perceptual pop-out stimuli in macaque V1. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Jacqueline Gottlieb,et al.  LIP responses to a popout stimulus are reduced if it is overtly ignored , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Wilsaan M. Joiner,et al.  Suppressive Surrounds of Receptive Fields In Monkey Frontal Eye Field , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  A visual salience map in the primate frontal eye field. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[35]  Nicholas C. Foley,et al.  Novelty Enhances Visual Salience Independently of Reward in the Parietal Lobe , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Li Jingling,et al.  Change Detection is Easier at Texture Border Bars When They are Parallel to the Border: Evidence for V1 Mechanisms of Bottom-up Salience , 2008, Perception.