The Era of State Energy Policy Innovation: A Review of Policy Instruments

U.S. energy and climate policy has evolved from the bottom-up, led by state governments, and internationally recognized for the use of unconventional and innovative policy instruments. This study focuses on policy instruments adopted throughout the era of state energy policy innovation that aim to diversify, decentralize, and decarbonize the electricity sector. Specific attention is devoted to the renewable portfolio standard, net metering, interconnection standards, tax incentives, public benefit funds, and energy efficiency resource standards. This analysis synthesizes the findings from the energy policy literature and provides a summary of the current state of understanding about the effects of various state energy policy instruments, and concludes with a discussion of broader trends that have emerged from the use of policy instruments in the state energy policy innovation era.

[1]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Carbon trading in the policy mix , 2003 .

[2]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation , 2008 .

[3]  María J. Montes-Sancho,et al.  Deregulation and environmental differentiation in the electric utility industry , 2007 .

[4]  Carolyn Fischer.  How Can Renewable Portfolio Standards Lower Electricity Prices , 2006 .

[5]  Thomas M. Marchitto,et al.  Enhanced Modern Heat Transfer to the Arctic by Warm Atlantic Water , 2011, Science.

[6]  M. Heiman.  Expectations for renewable energy under market restructuring: the U.S. experience , 2006 .

[7]  Sanya Carley.  State Renewable Energy Electricity Policies: An Empirical Evaluation of Effectiveness , 2009 .

[8]  S. Gouchoe,et al.  Case Studies on the Effectiveness of State Financial Incentives for Renewable Energy , 2002 .

[9]  K. Cory,et al.  Renewable Portfolio Standards in the States: Balancing Goals and Rules , 2007 .

[10]  R. Wiser,et al.  Policies and market factors driving wind power development in the United States , 2005 .

[11]  Andy S. Kydes,et al.  Impacts of a renewable portfolio generation standard on US energy markets , 2007 .

[12]  The effect of deregulation on US fossil fuel substitution in the generation of electricity , 1998 .

[13]  Barry G. Rabe,et al.  States on Steroids: The Intergovernmental Odyssey of American Climate Policy , 2008 .

[14]  M. Hughes,et al.  Northern hemisphere temperatures during the past millennium: Inferences, uncertainties, and limitations , 1999 .

[15]  R. Wiser,et al.  The renewables portfolio standard in Texas: an early assessment , 2001 .

[16]  Sanya Carley,et al.  Distributed generation: An empirical analysis of primary motivators , 2009 .

[17]  J. Stoutenborough,et al.  Encouraging Pollution-Free Energy: The Diffusion of State Net Metering Policies , 2008 .

[18]  Adam Rose,et al.  Reducing conflicts between climate policy and energy policy in the US: The important role of the states , 2006 .

[19]  Fredric C. Menz,et al.  The effectiveness of different policy regimes for promoting wind power: Experiences from the states , 2006 .

[20]  Robert J. Michaels.  Intermittent Currents: The Failure of Renewable Electricity Requirements , 2007 .

[21]  T. L. Forsyth,et al.  Effects of Net Metering on the Use of Small-Scale Wind Systems in the United States , 2002 .

[22]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Public support for reducing US reliance on fossil fuels: Investigating household willingness-to-pay for energy research and development , 2009 .

[23]  Jess Chandler,et al.  Trendy solutions: Why do states adopt Sustainable Energy Portfolio Standards? , 2009 .

[24]  Ryan Wiser,et al.  Weighing the Costs and Benefits of Renewables Portfolio Standards: A Comparative Analysis of State-Level Policy Impact Projections , 2007 .

[25]  Joanna I. Lewis,et al.  Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: An international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms , 2007 .

[26]  Public Benefit Funds , 2000 .

[27]  Haitao Yin,et al.  Do State Renewable Portfolio Standards Promote In-State Renewable Generation? , 2010 .

[28]  L. Goulder,et al.  Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy , 2008, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[29]  Sanya Carley,et al.  Decarbonization of the U.S. electricity sector: Are state energy policy portfolios the solution? , 2011 .

[30]  J. Alavalapati,et al.  Is the choice of renewable portfolio standards random , 2007 .

[31]  S. Fuss,et al.  Fuel price and technological uncertainty in a real options model for electricity planning , 2010 .

[32]  J. McLaren,et al.  State of the states 2009: Renewable energy development and the role of policy , 2009 .

[33]  Thomas P. Lyon,et al.  Why Do States Adopt Renewable Portfolio Standards?: An Empirical Investigation , 2007 .

[34]  Pablo del Río González,et al.  The interaction between emissions trading and renewable electricity support schemes. An overview of the literature , 2007 .

[35]  A. Löschel,et al.  Indicators of energy security in industrialised countries , 2010 .

[36]  Ryan Wiser,et al.  The Experience with Renewable Portfolio Standards in the United States , 2007 .

[37]  K. Palmer,et al.  COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY POLICIES , 2005 .

[38]  Bob van der Zwaan,et al.  An integrated assessment of climate change, air pollution, and energy security policy. , 2010 .

[39]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[40]  Christopher Cooper.  A National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Politically Correct or Just Plain Correct? , 2008 .

[41]  William D. Berry,et al.  Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States , 1998 .

[42]  Daniel C. Matisoff.  The Adoption of State Climate Change Policies and Renewable Portfolio Standards , 2008 .